We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
Earlier this month, Governor Rick Scott signed two growth
management bills into law that were approved during the 2012
Florida legislative session. The first bill, House Bill 979 (the
"DRI Bill"), amends several sections of the Florida
Statutes relating to Developments of Regional Impact
("DRI") to provide greater regulatory consistency and
reduce regulatory burdens for certain large-scale developments. In
addition, the DRI Bill adds a statutory exemption for qualified
target industry business projects which are not located in a Dense
Urban Land Area ("DULA"). Any proposed development not in
a DULA which is approved as a comprehensive plan amendment and
which is subject to a tax refund agreement pursuant to Section
288.106(5) of the Florida Statutes is exempt from DRI review. This
exemption is effective once a written agreement is executed by the
applicant, the local government and the state land planning agency.
The DRI Bill also creates a process for agricultural enclaves to
apply for a comprehensive plan amendment to allow non-agricultural
uses on the property. This time-limited opportunity must be invoked
by written application on or before January 1, 2013. The DRI Bill
will take effect on July 1, 2012.
The second bill signed into law by Governor Scott, House Bill
7081 (the "Glitch Bill"), is a wide-ranging
"glitch" bill that primarily provides consistency and
clarification to the 2011 Community Planning Act. Among other
things, the Glitch Bill revises the timeframe related to
transmittal of comprehensive plan amendments by local governments
after a public hearing and the timeframe in which a state land
planning agency must issue a notice of intent for a comprehensive
plan amendment related to a compliance agreement. The Glitch Bill
also authorizes local governments to retain charter provisions in
effect on June 1, 2011 for an initiative or referendum process in
regard to development orders or comprehensive plan amendments. The
Glitch Bill became effective upon becoming law on April 6,
2012.
Aaron J. Gorovitz Partner & Co-Chair, Land Use
& Zoning Group:
For more than 25 years, Aaron's practice has centered around
large and complex commercial, residential and mixed use real estate
projects throughout Central Florida. He is often involved in site
selection, drafting contracts, and due diligence and is lead
counsel in the procurement of Developments of Regional Impact
(DRIs), transit-oriented development, comprehensive plan
designations, zonings and other governmental approvals and
entitlements. He also formulates public/private partnerships, and
takes a lead role in the development, financing and leasing of
projects.
Miranda F. Fitzgerald Partner & Co-Chair, Land
Use & Zoning Group:
Partner Randi Fitzgerald focuses her practice on land use, zoning,
environmental matters and real estate development, including
comprehensive planning, Developments of Regional Impact
(DRI's), annexation, concurrency, vested rights and property
rights issues. She has served as lead counsel for more than 35
DRI's and has represented both property owners and local
governments. She represents clients in all phases of development
for commercial, residential and mixed-use projects, including site
selection, due diligence, and procurement of land use approvals and
entitlements.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
After years of court decisions, it is clear to real estate attorneys that "as is" real estate contracts are not "as is" when it comes to environmental conditions.
Contractors generally expect that if something goes wrong after construction is complete and multiple parties are sued, they are only responsible for the damages they may have caused.
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied a defendant architect’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the economic loss doctrine applies only to bar tort claims between parties to a contract.
Your Fair Housing Defense Blog Editor has written about the seven protected classes contained in our federal Fair Housing Act many times: race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status and disability.
