United States: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of 35 USC 145 Proceedings

On April 18, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Kappos v. Hyatt, affirming the Federal Circuit's en banc decision and holding that evidence not submitted to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) during prosecution is admissible in a civil action brought against the Director of the PTO under 35 U.S.C. § 145 subject only to the limitations imposed by the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court further held that the district court hearing a § 145 action must make a de novo finding "when the new evidence is presented on a disputed question of fact." Justice Thomas wrote the opinion for the Court. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Breyer, concurred.

A patent applicant who appeals an examiner's denial to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) and is "dissatisfied with the decision" of the Board may either appeal to the Federal Circuit under 35 U.S.C. § 141 or bring a civil action against the Director of the PTO in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia under § 145. The Federal Circuit's review in a § 141 appeal is expressly limited to the record before the Board. Section 145 includes no such express limitation.

The circumstances that brought Mr. Hyatt to file a § 145 action were unusual. Mr. Hyatt filed his patent application in 1995, prior to implementation of the GATT Uruguay Round changes to United States patent laws. The examiner rejected all 117 amended claims for lack of an adequate written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112. Mr. Hyatt appealed to the Board, which approved 39 claims and overturned 93% of the examiners objections, but sustained the examiner's written description rejections of the remaining 79 claims. Mr. Hyatt then filed a Request for Rehearing, which the Board dismissed on the grounds that he raised new arguments that could have been presented earlier in the prosecution or to the Board. In order to preserve his pre-GATT 17-year patent term, Mr. Hyatt filed a civil action against the Director under § 145, rather than continuing prosecution using available PTO procedures. Mr. Hyatt submitted a written declaration identifying portions of the specification that supported the claims that the Board held lacked written description. Mr. Hyatt's declaration was the only new evidence before the district court.

In its decision, the Supreme Court held that § 145 creates a sui generis statutory review regime that is distinct from review under other provisions of law. The Court rejected the PTO's argument that a § 145 action should be treated as an administrative review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and that therefore district courts should be limited to the record before the PTO and give deference to findings of fact made by the PTO as an executive agency. The Court reasoned that it makes little sense for a district court to defer to factual findings by the PTO when faced with new evidence because "[t]he [PTO], no matter how great its authority or expertise, cannot account for evidence that it has never seen." Instead, the Court held that a § 145 action is not a technical appeal of the Board's decision and therefore not subject to the rules of evidence that limit an appellate court's review to the record below. In reaching its holding, the Court relied on the evidentiary and procedural rules in effect when Congress passed the statute that originated the language of § 145 in 1870 and the 1884 Supreme Court decision in Butterworth v. United States ex rel. Hoe, each of which permitted the district court to consider evidence not previously presented to the PTO.

The Court recognized, but rightly dismissed, the concern that allowing new evidence and de novo findings in § 145 actions would encourage applicants to "withhold evidence from the PTO intentionally with the goal of presenting that evidence for the first time to a nonexpert judge." Such a withholding would be against the applicant's interest. As Justice Thomas explained: "An applicant who pursues such a strategy would be intentionally undermining his claims before the PTO on the speculative chance that he will gain some advantage in the 35 U.S.C. § 145 proceeding by presenting new evidence to a district court judge."

Concurring, Justice Sotomayor suggested that nothing in the majority's opinion would prevent a district court from using its discretion to exclude evidence deliberately suppressed or withheld in bad faith.

The decision is unlikely to increase the minimal number of § 145 actions. The circumstances that brought Mr. Hyatt to file an action under § 145—a 1995 filing date, a pre-GATT 17-year patent term and an application that claimed building blocks of the modern computer—were unique. Most applicants faced with the problem of needing to submit new evidence at a late stage of prosecution can easily do so through a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) at the PTO. An RCE is significantly faster and less costly than litigation in a district court. Additionally, as older applications age out of the application pool, particularly those filed before the implementation of the GATT Uruguay Round changes to United States patent laws, § 145 proceedings will become an even less desirable recourse for applicants who need to submit new evidence.

This decision likewise will have minimal impact on patent litigation. It provides little insight into the Court's standard of deference to PTO determinations. As the Court recognized, an action under § 145 is separate and distinct from judicial review under other provisions of law. Furthermore, the decision is consistent with the Court's decision last term in Microsoft v. i4i, in which the Court acknowledged that if the PTO did not have the opportunity to consider a piece of evidence relevant to an invalidity defense, the PTO's judgment may "lose significant force" and the presumption of validity may be "weakened" or "dissipated." Similarly, the Court here acknowledged that a decision by the PTO in the absence of a material piece of evidence may be given less weight than it would otherwise be accorded by a reviewing district court. In neither case, however, does the standard of review alter the established burden of proof. Finally, because the decision in Kappos is limited to a rarely-used statutory cause of action, it is unlikely to have broader implications for litigants.


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.