United States: Supreme Court Strikes Down A Diagnostic Method In Prometheus: Laws Of Nature Coupled With "Well-Understood, Routine [And] Conventional" Steps Not Patent Eligible

On March 20, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., holding the claimed diagnostic methods ineligible for patent protection under Section 101 of the Patent Act. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion for the Court, which held that the treatment methods for optimizing therapeutic efficacy merely "set forth laws of nature" and that the additional steps of the claims were too "well- understood, routine, [and] conventional" to bridge the gap between an unpatentable law of nature and a patent-eligible application of those laws. Recognizing that the Section 101 patent-eligibility inquiry and the validity inquiry under Sections 102/103/112 "might sometimes overlap," the Court nevertheless declined the invitation of the Government to do away with a separate 101 inquiry. A machine or manufacture may be inventive but it is not necessarily patent eligible.

The claims at issue were directed to an application of a natural phenomenon – namely, the relationship between the concentration in the patient's blood of certain metabolites following treatment with thiopurine drugs and the likelihood that the drug dosage will be ineffective or induce harmful side-effects. In particular, the claims required "administering" thiopurine drugs to a patient, "determining" the level of the metabolites, and "wherein" clauses that suggested to physicians that they perhaps modify the drug dosage depending on whether the level of metabolites were too high or too low.

In analyzing the claims, the Court first held that the "administering" step simply referred to "a pre-existing audience" of doctors who used thiopurine drugs to treat patients prior to the patented claims. By contrast, the Federal Circuit, which twice held the Prometheus claims patent eligible, pointed to that step as transformative in the context of the patient to whom the drug was administered. Such a transformation, the Court held, was "irrelevant." The Court also rejected the notion that limiting the use of the method to a particular technical environment could circumvent the prohibition against patenting abstract ideas. Second, the Court held that the "wherein" clauses simply told a doctor about the relevant law of nature, here the known correlation of metabolite levels and drug efficacy and toxicity, and added a suggestion to "take those laws into account when treating [a] patient." Third, the Court held that the "determining" step was only an instruction "to engage in well-understood, routine, conventional activity previously engaged in by scientists who work in the field." The Federal Circuit had also found this step transformative in terms of the blood sample collected for analysis. The Court, however, hypothesized that methods might exist or be developed to "determine" without transformation. While affirming that the Federal Circuit's machine-or-transformation test is a "useful clue" to patentability, the Court held that the test did not trump the law of nature exclusion and simply "fails" with regard to the Prometheus claims at issue.

When viewed in combination, the Court held, the three claimed steps "consist of well-understood, routine, conventional activity already engaged in by the scientific community; and those steps, when viewed as a whole, add nothing significant beyond the sum of their parts taken separately. For these reasons we believe that the steps are not sufficient to transform unpatentable natural correlations into patentable applications of those regularities." Notably, the Court reaffirmed the notion that "[p]urely 'conventional or obvious' '[pre]-solution activity' is normally not sufficient to transform an unpatentable law of nature into a patent-eligible application of such a law."

In supporting its decision, the Court pointed to many of its 35 U.S.C. § 101 precedents. Justice Breyer contrasted the Prometheus claims to the patentable process for applying a mathematical equation to the molding and curing of rubber in Diamond v. Diehr, holding that the Diehr claims, but not the Prometheus claims, had multiple additional steps that were not "in context obvious, already in use or purely conventional." He then found the Prometheus claims more similar to the unpatentable process for applying a mathematical equation to update alarm limits in Parker v. Flook where any additional steps were "all 'well known' to the point where, putting the formula to the side, there was no 'inventive concept' in the claimed application of the formula." Justice Breyer also observed, "[i]f a law of nature is not patentable, then neither is a process reciting a law of nature, unless that process has additional features that provide practical assurance that the process is more than a drafting effort designed to monopolize the law of nature itself." He concluded that "[t]he claim before us presents a case for patentability that is weaker than the (patent-eligible) claim in Diehr and no stronger than the (unpatentable) claim in Flook."

The Court emphasized concerns that patents must not interfere with future uses of laws of nature. The Court seemed particularly concerned with interfering with a physician's treatment decisions. Justice Breyer referred to Bilski v. Kappos, where the Court concluded that allowing "petitioners to patent risk hedging would preempt use of this approach in all fields." The Court, however, suggested that in other cases a different balance might be struck between the risk of foreclosing future innovation and the relative contribution of the inventor to a technical field. And, it pointed to Congress as the best able to craft finely tailored rules applicable to specific fields of endeavor (for example, the special rules for plant patents).

For those who own or seek method patents that are based on the application of laws of nature, the Court's decision may have a significant impact. The Court, however, did not do away with these patents. In fact, the Court expressly stated, "[w]e need not, and do not, now decide whether were the steps at issue here less conventional, these features of the claims would prove sufficient to invalidate them," meaning that such patents incorporating an "inventive application" or "inventive concept" in a particular application of the law of nature could still be patent-eligible. The Court also contrasted the Prometheus claims with "a typical patent on a new drug or a new way of using an existing drug," implying that the patentability of such claims is not in question. Ultimately, it will be up to patent applicants, the Patent and Trademark Office, litigants, and the courts to determine which methods claim unpatentable principles or abstract ideas and which are sufficiently inventive applications of those principles or abstract ideas to merit a patent.

The profound effects of this decision are already apparent. Certiorari is pending before the Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. USPTO, et al. (the Myriad Genetics case), where Myriad's patents cover breast cancer genes as well as related method claims. In Myriad, the Federal Circuit held that claims to diagnostic methods reciting "comparing" and "analyzing" steps were not patent eligible as being directed to abstract mental processes. Indeed, it contrasted those steps with the "administering" and "determining" steps of Prometheus, which it held were transformative and breathed patentability into the claims. The Supreme Court's decision today would seem to bode poorly to the Court's granting certiorari on those claims. The question of the patent eligibility or ineligibility of Myriad's claims to DNA molecules as mere products of nature or as changed chemical compounds as the result of an "isolating" step remains for the Court.

www.ropesgray.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.