United States: Judicial Scrutiny Of Arbitration Clauses Under Concepcio

Last Updated: February 15 2012
Article by Thomas E. Gilbertsen and Michael P. Bracken

Two recent federal appellate decisions demonstrate the limits of last year's Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011). In Concepcion, plaintiffs alleged a class of California customers to challenge the wireless carrier's practice of charging sales tax on phones promoted as "free" under various service agreements. When AT&T asserted the arbitration and class waiver provisions in its subscriber agreements, the Southern District of California ruled that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because it contained a class action waiver, and was therefore unenforceable under the rule announced by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. Superior Court, 36 Cal.4th 148, 113 P.3d 1100 (Cal. 2005). The Ninth Circuit affirmed on those same grounds. The Discover Bank Rule claimed support in § 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, (9 U.S.C. §2) (FAA) providing certain exceptions to enforcement of arbitration agreements, including "such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract." Since the FAA's savings clause allows arbitration agreements to be defeated by state law contract defenses, the Discover Bank Rule was considered by some to be an appropriate application of traditional unconscionability defenses against class action waivers in arbitration agreements. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681, 687 (1966).

The Supreme Court reversed, holding that Discover Bank is preempted by the FAA because any state statute or judicial "rule" purporting to invalidate arbitration agreements stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress favoring arbitration by enacting the FAA. The FAA's overarching purpose is to ensure the enforcement of arbitration agreements, under which parties may agree to limit the issues subject to arbitration, or arbitrate according to specific rules, or limit with whom they will arbitrate. But class arbitration, to the extent imposed by rule of court rather than agreement of the parties, is at odds with arbitration's essential function and the FAA's stated policies.

When the Concepcion decision was issued in late April 2011, it was widely hailed as a life-altering victory for the class action defense bar – prompting many to declare that arbitration provisions in consumer contracts and employee handbooks would now insulate merchants and employers from class action litigation. But in the early going, Concepcion's impact has been more incremental. To be sure, many courts have invoked Concepcion to compel arbitration and stay putative class action. But two recent federal appeals court decisions demonstrate how arbitration provisions in consumer agreements and employment policies still trigger judicial scrutiny when interposed to defeat operation of class action rules.

In In re American Express Merchants' Litigation, 2012 WL 284518 (2d Cir. February 1, 2012), merchants who accept American Express cards brought suit in the Southern District of New York pursuing class action antitrust claims. AmEx moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of its agreements with the merchants, which contained a provision allowing either party to elect arbitration and, if arbitration was chosen, precluding class action litigation and the arbitration of on any claims on an aggregated basis. In an earlier opinion, the Second Circuit concluded that it would be prohibitively expensive for the class action merchant plaintiffs to bring individual claims since it would be necessary for them to develop expert testimony at a cost exponentially more than potential individual recoveries (expert fees that could not be recovered under the Sherman Act even if the merchant prevailed in an individual arbitration).

Therefore, the Second Circuit ruled that the class action waiver in the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because it precluded the merchants from vindicating their federal statutory rights. The U.S. Supreme Court had vacated the Second Circuit's original opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. Animal Feeds, Int'l, Corp. which held that "a party may not be compelled under the FAA to submit to class arbitration unless there is a contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so." Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. Animal Feeds, Int'l, Corp., 130 S.Ct. 1758, 1775 (2010). On remand, the Second Circuit adhered to its decision that the class action waiver was unenforceable but, before the appellate mandate was issued, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Concepcion.

Distinguishing Concepcion, the Second Circuit adhered to its previous two decisions that the AmEx class action waiver is unenforceable, concluding that neither Stolt-Nielsen nor Concepcion render class action arbitration waivers per se enforceable and that neither of those cases foreclosed the issue presented:

"whether a class-action arbitration waiver clause is enforceable even if the plaintiffs are able to demonstrate that the practical effect of enforcement would be to preclude their ability to vindicate their federal statutory rights." In re American Express Merchants' Litigation, 2012 WL 284518 at *7.

The Second Circuit concluded that in this case, the class-action arbitration waiver clause was unenforceable because it impinged upon the practical enforcement of other federal statutory rights. The Second Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the defendant's motion to compel arbitration. By resting upon the practical implications of making individual arbitration of antitrust claims difficult to pursue, the Second Circuit's reasoning appears to go beyond, or even around, the FAA Section 2 and unconscionability defenses to arbitration. We are watching this case for further en banc petitioning.

In another recent putative class action, Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc., 2012 WL 205851 (5th Cir. January 25, 2012), a former sales rep of 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc. ("24 Hour") filed suit in the Southern District of Texas after his employment terminated, alleging that 24 Hour violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to adequately compensate him and other similarly situated employees for overtime work. 24 Hour moved the district court to stay proceedings and compel arbitration of Carey's claim per provisions in defendant's employee handbook which directed that employment-related disputes would be "resolved only by an arbitrator through final and binding arbitration." The handbook further specified that FLSA disputes were among those subject to mandatory arbitration and provided that disputes cannot be brought as class actions. Carey signed a form acknowledging that he had received the employee handbook (the "Acknowledgment"). Importantly, the Acknowledgment contained a provision stating that 24 Hour had the right to "revise, delete, and add to the employee handbook," and any revisions to the handbook "will be communicated through official written notice."

Carey argued and the Fifth Circuit agreed that the arbitration agreement was illusory because 24 Hour retained the right to unilaterally amend the agreement at any time and it could even do so retroactively, eliminating the arbitration requirement after a dispute arose. Specifically the Court held that:

"where one party to an arbitration agreement seeks to invoke arbitration to settle a dispute, if the other party can suddenly change the terms of the agreement to avoid arbitration, then the agreement was illusory from the outset. The crux of this issue is whether 24 Hour Fitness has the power to make changes to its arbitration policy that have retroactive effect, meaning changes to the policy that would strip the right of arbitration from an employee who has already attempted to invoke it." Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc., 2012 WL 205851 at *2.

The Fifth Circuit ruled that the employee handbook's silence about the possible retroactive application of amendments to the arbitration policy allowed amendments to apply retroactively. Therefore, the arbitration policy was deemed illusory under Texas law and unenforceable in light of 24 Hour's unilateral ability to avoid its promise to arbitrate even as to claims that were already in progress. The Fifth Circuit confirmed the district court's ruling that 24 Hour could not compel arbitration to go forward.

The take-away from these recent appellate decisions is this: Concepcion is no mere talisman for defeating class actions with an arbitration provision. The public policies undergirding the FAA may collide with the Congressional purposes of other statutory regimes, and state law unconscionability – procedural or substantive – may still arise in a variety of individual circumstances to defeat a consumer contract's arbitration provision. The Concepcion decision itself begins with extended emphasis on all the ways AT&T Mobility's arbitration provision favored consumers and was fundamentally fair. When it comes to crafting, amending or litigating an arbitration provision in a consumer contract, that comparison is as good a place as any to start.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Thomas E. Gilbertsen
 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.