ARTICLE
8 February 2012

NYSE Limits Broker Discretionary Voting on Corporate Governance Proposals

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
NYSE Rule 452 governs the situation where NYSE member brokers are permitted to vote shares for proxy proposals without specific instructions from their clients.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Originally published February 3, 2012

Keywords: NYSE Rule 452, member brokers, vote shares, proxy proposals, NYSE procedures

NYSE Rule 452 governs the situation where NYSE member brokers are permitted to vote shares for proxy proposals without specific instructions from their clients. In recent years, the situations where brokers have been permitted to vote without direction from their clients have been limited so that brokers are now prohibited from voting uninstructed shares for the election of directors and from voting on executive compensation proposals.

On January 25, 2012, the NYSE issued Information Memo 12-4, which further limits broker discretionary voting by prohibiting brokers from voting uninstructed shares on corporate governance proposals contained in proxy statements, such as:

  • Proposals to declassifying the board of directors
  • Proposals regarding majority voting in the election of directors
  • Proposals eliminating supermajority voting requirements
  • Proposals providing for the use of written consents
  • Proposals providing rights to call special meetings
  • Proposals implementing certain types of anti-takeover provision overrides

These changes to NYSE procedures are effective immediately.

Practical Considerations

  • Companies that will be submitting corporate governance proposals for shareholder approval may want to engage shareholders on these proposals to make sure that they understand the importance of instructing their brokers to vote on these proposals. It may be useful for such companies to specifically mention in their proxy statements that brokers will not be able to vote on these proposals unless they receive voting directions.
  • The list of corporate governance proposals included in the NYSE's Information Memo is not comprehensive. Any company including in its proxy statement a corporate governance proposal that is not covered by the above list can consult with the NYSE staff as to whether brokers will be able to vote uninstructed shares on such proposal.
  • Because Rule 452 governs the voting rights of NYSE member brokers regardless of whether the issuer is listed on the NYSE, the changes in the application of Rule 452 affect NASDAQ-listed and other non-NYSE-listed companies, as well as NYSE-listed companies, whose shares are held by an NYSE member broker.

Learn more about our Corporate & Securities practice.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2012. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More