ARTICLE
14 October 2011

Lady Gaga Goes After And Files Lawsuit Against Infringer

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

Pop star Lady Gaga filed a lawsuit in late September, 2011 in New York state court against Excite Worldwide LLC, a marketing company based in Nevada.
United States Intellectual Property
Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • within Immigration topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Environment & Waste Management and Insurance industries

Pop star Lady Gaga filed a lawsuit in late September, 2011 in New York state court against Excite Worldwide LLC, a marketing company based in Nevada.  The superstar alleges that the company is selling cosmetics and jewelry using the LADY GAGA trademark and has, without Ms. Gaga's consent, filed federal trademark applications for the LADY GAGA trademark for a variety of products.  Lady Gaga claims that Excite has refused to withdraw these trademark applications and this is despite the pending refusal by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office of the applications without Ms. Gaga's written consent.

Excite has also apparently ignored the demands to withdraw the trademark applications by Lady Gaga, which trademark applications are blocking the real Lady Gaga from proceeding with her own trademark applications for LADY GAGA.

Lady Gaga is alleging unfair competition and false designation of origin, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and is requesting injunctive relief, treble damages, and punitive damages and here's a copy of the complaint Lady Gaga Complaint.pdf.  Given that Excite was clearly aware of Lady Gaga's trademark rights, I'm not quite sure what Excite is thinking here...

www.cozen.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More