ARTICLE
31 December 2013

TC's Inside IP - Winter 2013

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
A quarterly newsletter from the Intellectual Property Practice Group at Thompson Coburn LLP.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In This Issue

  • Final Really Does Mean Final in the Federal Circuit
  • The AIA: Reviewing the First Year of Inter Partes Review
  • Patent Troll Legislation Takes Another Step Forward: But Will It – or Should It – Matter?

Final Really Does Mean Final in the Federal Circuit

By Michael L. Nepple

Defendants in patent infringement lawsuits often request that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") reexamine the patent-in-suit. Patent reexamination is a process where the validity of an issued patent is again reviewed by the PTO. Patent infringement litigation, of course, takes place in federal district courts. Often, a patent infringement action brought by the patentee in federal district court and a reexamination proceeding initiated by the accused infringer in the PTO proceed at the same time.

Read more.

The AIA: Reviewing the First Year of Inter Partes Review

By Katherine E. Colvin

September 16, 2013, marked the one-year anniversary of the implementation of the America Invents Act, and with it, the introduction of an important tool for challenging the validity of an issued patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office – Inter Partes Review (IPR). IPR has replaced inter partes reexaminations. In contrast, inter partes reexaminations were applicable only to patents issued from an original application filed on or after November 29, 1999; IPR is available for all patents.

Read more.

Patent Troll Legislation Takes Another Step Forward: But Will It – or Should It – Matter?

By Jason M. Schwent

On December 5, the U.S. House of Representatives approved House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte's Innovation Act. This follow-up to the America Invents Act is the first of several Congressional bills targeting so-called "patent trolls."

Though touted as a needed force of change, the bill, as approved by the House of Representatives, lacks any real change of note. Thus, while almost everyone (Democrats, Republicans, the White House, major businesses, etc.) agrees that patent assertion entity litigation is a problem, not all agree that legislation is the best way to fix the problem, or that this bill in particular will do the job.

Read more.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
31 December 2013

TC's Inside IP - Winter 2013

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More