ARTICLE
21 February 2014

IRS Fighting Hard To Avoid Tea Party Class Action Claims

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The IRS recently filed a motion to dismiss class action claims brought by Tea Party groups in NorCal Tea Party Patriots, et. al. v. IRS, et al.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The IRS recently filed a motion to dismiss class action claims brought by Tea Party groups.  In NorCal Tea Party Patriots, et. al. v. IRS, et. al., S.D. Ohio, Case No. 1:13-cv-00341, Tea Party groups asserted that the IRS singled out their organizations when those organizations sought exemption from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, which would allow those groups to avoid paying duplicative tax on contributions made for expressive activities.  The Tea Party groups assert that the IRS targeted their organizations for excessive scrutiny which caused delay and expense, violated the Privacy Act of 1974 and violated the groups' First and Fifth Amendment rights.  The groups seek damages for the privacy violation, expense of complying with unlawful information requests, loss of donations, membership fees and grants, and increased tax burdens.

The IRS motion to dismiss argues that the case should be dismissed because organizations do not have standing to bring Privacy Act claims, which are only available to individuals.  The IRS also argues that the Tea Party groups' claims for damages are barred by the Declaratory Judgment Act and the Anti-Injunction Act.  Lastly, the IRS argues that new claims for damages brought  pursuant to Sections 6103 and 7431 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allow damages for unauthorized disclosure or inspection of confidential tax return information, are barred because the inspections occurred as a result of the plaintiffs' own requests for tax-exempt treatment.

This blog is a joint post with our BakerHostetler Global Tax Enforcement Blog available at http://www.globaltaxenforcement.com/tax-controversy/irs-fighting-hard-to-avoid-tea-party-class-action-claims/.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More