ARTICLE
10 September 2018

Final Chapter For The DOL Fiduciary Rule

WB
Womble Bond Dickinson

Contributor

Being different is our normal way of working. It's not just what we do, it's how we do it.

You'll benefit from more than just the skills and know-how you'd expect from a pioneering law firm; our technology specialists, process and project management leaders, accountants and tax advisers work alongside lawyers with specialist sector expertise – from business to government.

Working side by side, we'll find clever solutions to your age-old problems.

With 1,300 professionals across 39 offices in the US and UK, we're equipped to tackle mission-critical challenges, wherever you do business.

Want the proof? It's in our track record. With our straight-talking, entrepreneurial approach, we’ve set new industry precedents, achieved market firsts and delivered trailblazing work for our clients.

So, whatever your future holds, we're here for you with A Point of View Like No Other.

The Department of Labor's controversial, Obama-era Fiduciary Rule is dead and gone.
United States Employment and HR
Womble Bond Dickinson are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Property industries

It's official. The Department of Labor's controversial, Obama-era Fiduciary Rule is dead and gone. On June 21, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its mandate certifying its March 15 split decision that vacated the Fiduciary Rule in its entirety. The majority ruled that the DOL exceeded its authority when it promulgated a new rule that required brokers to act in the best interests of their clients when giving retirement investment advice. The mandate did not mince words: "It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is reversed, and vacate the fiduciary rule in toto." The Fifth Circuit also ordered the DOL to pay the costs on the appeal of the U.S Chamber of Commerce and several other interested industry groups and national associations.

The mandate should have issued on May 7 but was delayed as the AARP and the States of New York, California, and Oregon filed eleventh-hour motions to intervene requesting leave to file a petition for rehearing en banc. The Fifth Circuit denied those motions and a consolidated motion for reconsideration. As a result, the DOL had until June 13 to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. It did not, and the rest is history.

The DOL's prior five-part test on when a person who provides investment advice for a fee is considered a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act will remain in place. And the battle over a fiduciary standard for investment advice will now focus on the Securities and Exchange Commission's current "best-interest" rule proposal. Although many industry stakeholders argued that the SEC always should have taken the lead in setting standards for brokers and other investment advisers, the debut of the SEC's "best interest" standard was met with sharp criticism from all sides. It will likely face many of the same challenges that ultimately killed the Fiduciary Rule – the cost and complexity of implementation; concerns that it will limit investor choice; and confusion over how it will be enforced. The 90-day public comment period closed on August 7. The SEC should expect that advocates and opponents of a fiduciary standard will lobby hard and may even resort to litigation. In the meantime, investors and investment professionals must patiently wait for clear guidance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More