ARTICLE
23 November 2020

Summary Judgement In Medical Malpractice Action

LD
Lincoln Derr PLLC
Contributor
Lincoln Derr is a North Carolina based women-owned and managed Civil Litigation Law Firm. Our attorneys represent some of the largest healthcare practices, municipalities, and Fortune 500 companies throughout the Southeast. We have expertise in a wide range of practice areas but focus on management-side Medical/Professional Liability, Labor & Employment, Complex Business, and Construction.
Attorney Scott Addison recently won summary judgment in defense of our client, an orthopedic surgeon, in a case arising out of a nerve injury that occurred during a procedure to shorten a patient's leg.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Medical Malpractice action against Lincoln Derr client dismissed

Attorney Scott Addison recently won summary judgment in defense of our client, an orthopedic surgeon, in a case arising out of a nerve injury that occurred during a procedure to shorten a patient's leg. The patient had previously undergone a total hip replacement by a physician in another state that, unfortunately, resulted in a leg-length discrepancy that caused her significant problems.

She traveled to consult with our client about correcting the problem, and a decision was ultimately made to perform a procedure that would remove a small portion of her lower femur to make her legs the same length once again. The procedure appeared to have gone well, but soon after, the patient experienced a foot-drop and tests indicated a likely nerve injury.

A subsequent surgeon explored the nerve and confirmed it was injured at the surgery location and was not conducting any signal to the lower leg. The patient then sued our client for injuring the nerve during the procedure.

The patient's expert witness proposed a theory that the surgeons had inadvertently grabbed the sciatic nerve with retractors (used to expose the surgical field and to protect the nerves and vessels) and cut the nerve with the saw when cutting the bone. The surgeons testified that they conducted the surgery in the usual and proper manner, as they always did, and testified the retractors had been placed directly against the bone without anything caught between the retractor and the bone.

We moved for summary judgment on the basis that negligence cannot be presumed from the mere fact of injury in a medical negligence case. The patient's expert had clearly based his opinion of negligence on the fact that the nerve was injured during the procedure.

After very thoughtful consideration of all the testimony and facts of the case, the Court agreed that the plaintiff's theory of negligence was based on the mere fact of injury and granted summary judgment in our client's favor.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
23 November 2020

Summary Judgement In Medical Malpractice Action

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
Lincoln Derr is a North Carolina based women-owned and managed Civil Litigation Law Firm. Our attorneys represent some of the largest healthcare practices, municipalities, and Fortune 500 companies throughout the Southeast. We have expertise in a wide range of practice areas but focus on management-side Medical/Professional Liability, Labor & Employment, Complex Business, and Construction.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More