ARTICLE
31 March 2022

FERC Backtracks On Pipeline Approval Policy Changes

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a brief order on March 24, 2022, backtracking on the historic – and divisive – changes it had announced several weeks ago to its natural gas pipeline certification policies.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a brief order on March 24, 2022, backtracking on the historic – and divisive – changes it had announced several weeks ago to its natural gas pipeline certification policies.

In its earlier changes, issued on Feb. 17 along partisan lines, FERC released two final policy statements concerning its evaluation of natural gas projects, both of which were apparently motivated by a concern over climate change. First, the Commission updated a previous policy statement describing how it will determine whether a new interstate natural gas transportation project is required by "public convenience and necessity" under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). Second, FERC issued an interim policy statement explaining how it will assess the impacts of natural gas infrastructure projects on climate change in its reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and NGA. In both of these statements, FERC signaled that it would more rigorously examine the effects of such gas projects on climate change before deciding whether to approve them.

In its latest order, FERC downgraded both statements to "draft" status and stated that it will not apply them to pending project applications or, indeed, any applications filed before the Commission finalizes guidance on these matters. This action followed a considerable political outcry, in which fossil fuel industry groups and congressional Republicans had complained that FERC was injecting critical uncertainty into the pipeline approval process.

Interested parties have until April 25 to file comments on the draft policy statements, with any reply comments due by May 25. It will then likely be several months at least until FERC takes final action on these matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More