SPACs As An Exit Strategy For Cannabis Businesses

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Contributor
With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
A developing market for owners of cannabis businesses looking for a potential buyer are SPACs, special purpose acquisition companies.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A developing market for owners of cannabis businesses looking for a potential buyer are SPACs, special purpose acquisition companies. SPACs raise money in public offerings with the purpose of acquiring companies, usually in a specified range of industries or located in a particular geographic area. The SPACs cannot have a particular target in mind at the time of the public offering. Among some of the more recent SPACs with a cannabis industry focus, MTech Acquisition Corp. closed a public offering for $57.5 million in February 2018, and Cannabis Strategies Acquisition Corp. closed a CDN $134.75 million (approximately US $103.78 million) public offering in Canada in December 2017. This post looks at some of the issues involved that are unique to being acquired by a SPAC.

  • The SPAC has a deadline for closing acquisitions. Unlike other types of companies, SPACs must consummate an acquisition within a certain period of time or return the funds raised from public offerings to the investors. This may provide additional leverage to a targeted business approached by a SPAC coming close to its deadline.
  • The SPAC must acquire companies with a certain minimum value. Generally the minimum value is 80% of the money the SPAC is holding in escrow from the proceeds of its public offering. If the SPAC is pursuing a target below this threshold, it can acquire multiple businesses with a combined value above the threshold. Having to arrange multiple simultaneous closings would obviously complicate the acquisitions process and add a greater degree of uncertainty for a prospective target as to whether the transaction will be completed.
  • The acquisition may be more likely to require stockholder approval than an acquisition by a non-SPAC. Depending on the structure of the acquisition and the nature of the proposed acquirer, an acquisition by a non-SPAC may not require stockholder approval. As SPACs are public companies they would generally have to prepare a proxy statement to obtain stockholder approval, which proxy statement is subject to review by the applicable securities authorities.
  • Public stockholders in the SPAC will have the right to redeem their shares in connection with an acquisition. This right can be exercised in connection with a stockholder vote, or, in lieu of requiring a stockholder vote for an acquisition, some SPACs instead provide for making a tender offer for stockholder shares. To the extent that a SPAC proposes to acquire a business with cash as a substantial component of the purchase price, the SPAC's ability to pay the purchase price could be substantially impaired if significant number of stockholders elect to redeem and the SPAC is otherwise unable to make up the shortfall.
  • If the purchase price includes stock, there may be rights affecting the value of the stock. Generally, stock in a SPAC in a public offering is sold together with warrants with an exercise price at a premium to the initial offering price of the shares. Depending on the valuation of any stock included in the purchase price in an acquisition, the exercise price of the warrants may be greater or less than the value of the stock issued to a target.

As an illustration of the potential difficulties in an acquisition by a SPAC, in July 2017 it was announced that the publisher of High Times was going to be acquired by a SPAC, Origo Acquisition Corp. The merger has yet to be consummated, and Origo has scheduled a stockholder meeting for June 12 looking for approval to extend the time that Origo has to close a transaction before having to dissolve.

In conclusion, while SPACs offer some benefits to potential sellers including: a strong incentive to close on deals, a substantial pool of cash (virtually all of the proceeds from their IPO) which may limit any need to obtain outside funding to complete an acquisition, and the ability to potentially issue publically tradeable stock as part of the purchase price for an acquisition, there are also a number of potential obstacles in closing a transaction with a SPAC that should be accounted for by any business looking to sell itself to a SPAC.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

SPACs As An Exit Strategy For Cannabis Businesses

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More