CMS Provides More Hints At Future Stark Law Modifications

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP
Contributor
For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
After years of provider feedback, this month CMS provided another indication that potentially significant modifications to the Stark Law are looming.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

After years of provider feedback, this month CMS provided another indication that potentially significant modifications to the Stark Law are looming.

Speaking at the Federation of American Hospitals' 2019 Public Policy Conference, CMS Administrator Seema Verma noted that the agency plans to issue updated regulations at some point in 2019. Verma noted that the updated regulations will seek to spur care coordination in an era of increasing use of value-based payment models. She noted that Congress passed the Stark Law at a time when fee-for-service payment arrangements were prevalent, and such a regulatory model may not be as appropriate today as providers accept more risk for cost and outcomes.

Verma's comments follow CMS's 2018 request for information (RFI) concerning Stark Law updates and serve as another expression of CMS's willingness to modify the current regulatory environment. The potential regulatory modifications mentioned by Verma reflect many of the concerns and proposals raised by commenters to the 2018 RFI (discussed in a previous Health Law Checkup post). Some of these shared concerns include:

  • The need for updates to reflect the shift toward value-based payments with many commenters suggesting CMS create a new exception for value-based payment arrangements;
  • Desired clarifications to key definitions in the Stark Law, including:

    • "fair market value"

    • "commercial reasonableness," and

    • "take into account the volume or value of referrals or other business generated";

  • A desire for an approach to address "technical" noncompliance with the Stark Law such as missing signatures or incorrect dates; and

  • The need to modernize the regulations to account for cybersecurity and electronic health record requirements.

Exact details on the extent and timing of potential modifications remain unknown.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

CMS Provides More Hints At Future Stark Law Modifications

United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More