Banking Regulators Provide Guidance To Examiners On COVID-19 Risk Management Assessments

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The Federal Reserve Board (the "FRB"), the FDIC, the OCC, the National Credit Union Administration and state financial regulators (collectively, the "Banking Agencies") provided guidance to examiners.
United States Finance and Banking

The Federal Reserve Board (the "FRB"), the FDIC, the OCC, the National Credit Union Administration and state financial regulators (collectively, the "Banking Agencies") provided guidance to examiners for assessing the "safety and soundness" of a financial institution during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the interagency guidance, the Banking Agencies advised that when assigning supervisory ratings to financial institutions in accordance with the "Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System" (a/k/a "CAMELS") or the "Rating System for U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banking Organizations (a/k/a "ROCA"), examiners should assess:

  • the "reasonableness" of the management's response to COVID-19;
  • the management's risk assessment and mitigation, in light of the institution's size, complexity and risk profile; and
  • the management's effectiveness in addressing changes in the institution's business markets.

Where an institution is given a lower rating, the guidance indicates that examiners should consider the supervisory response, and determine (i) whether the institution's weaknesses are a result of the economic issues caused by the pandemic, or of management deficiencies; and (ii) the reasonableness of efforts by the institution to work with borrowers unable to meet payment obligations as a result of the pandemic.

In addition, the Banking Agencies stated that, when considering whether to pursue an enforcement action against an institution for failures related to the pandemic, the examiners should evaluate whether an institution's management has (i) "appropriately planned for financial resiliency and continuity of operations"; (ii) implemented "prudent policies"; and (iii) taken actions to remedy the specific failure(s).

Originally published June 24, 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.



Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More