ARTICLE
9 July 2013

Draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance Thorough But In Places Too Conservative, Parties Say

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

The Environmental Protection Agency's draft guidance on vapor intrusion, the migration of volatile chemicals from contaminated soil or water into buildings, is thorough and has made progress, but according to multiple parties is too conservative.
United States Environment
Fox Rothschild LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Automotive, Basic Industries and Insurance industries

Chris Roe, Adam Cutler and Karen Davis were quoted in the Daily Environment Report article "Draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance Thorough But in Places Too Conservative, Parties Say." While the full text can be found in the June 26, 2013, issue of Daily Environment Report, a synopsis is noted below. 

The Environmental Protection Agency's draft guidance on vapor intrusion, the migration of volatile chemicals from contaminated soil or water into buildings, is thorough and has made progress, but according to multiple parties is too conservative. 

"Overall, the revised guidance does a thorough job of incorporating many of the technical nuances, developments, and lessons learned from the last 10 years of investigations," Chris Roe, Adam Cutler and Karen Davis said. 

In addition, it "appears to take a significant step toward establishing a comprehensive and consistent approach to vapor intrusion investigations," the group said. "However, the overly conservative approach throughout the guidance will exacerbate existing challenges for vapor intrusion investigations and burden property owners, communities, and responsible parties with vapor intrusion studies that may not be warranted and may cause unnecessary alarm." 

Click here to view the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More