On April 22, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in a trio of cases, which will finally allow the Court to decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or an individual's status as transgender (or transitioning). As it currently stands, the federal circuits are split on these issues.
The Court will review the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case of R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC, dealing with an employee allegedly fired because she was transitioning from male to female. In that case, the Sixth Circuit plainly concluded that "[d]iscrimination on the basis of transgender and transitioning status is necessarily discrimination on the basis of sex" and "discrimination on the basis of transgender and transitioning status violates Title VII."
Based on this holding, the Supreme Court is set to consider "[w]hether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)." If the Court's framing of the issue is any indication, transgender individuals in the Sixth Circuit may retain, and those in other judicial circuits may obtain, Title VII's protections, once the Supreme Court rules—but it remains to be seen whether it will be through the bright-line rule adopted by the Sixth Circuit or an extension of the more context-specific stereotyping theory established in Price Waterhouse.
The Supreme Court will also hear the cases of Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda. These cases, originating out of the Eleventh and Second Circuits, respectively, involve claims that employees were allegedly discharged because of their sexual orientation. The Supreme Court will settle the ultimate issue, whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes discrimination "because of . . . sex" as prohibited by Title VII. This issue is also the topic of a current circuit split with only the Second and Seventh Circuits recognizing protection for sexual orientation within Title VII.
Oral arguments on these cases could be as early as the fall of 2019, although no date has been set yet, and a decision could be as early as mid-2020. We will continue to monitor these cases and will report on any developments in what are expected to be landmark decisions.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.