In a January 2010 New York Department of Labor (DOL) opinion
letter, the DOL clarified the prohibitions under the New York Labor
Law that do not permit an employer to make deductions from
paychecks to recover overpayments or advances.
Section 193 of the New York labor Law provides, in relevant part,
as follows:
|
The DOL opinion cites the New York State Court of Appeals decision
in Angello v. Labor Ready, 7 NY 3d 579 (2006), in which
the court noted that payments that go "directly to the
employer or its subsidiary violate[s] both the letter of the
statute and the protective policy underlying it." The DOL
opinion, in reliance on the Labor Ready decision, notes
that the deductions permitted by Section 193(1)(b) are either
"investments of money for the later benefit of the employee,
such as deductions for insurance premiums, pension or health and
welfare benefits and payments for United States bonds" or
"are used by someone other than the employee or employer to
support some purpose of the employee, such as contributions for
charitable organizations or payments for dues or assessments to a
labor organization."
The DOL opinion notes the additional restrictions in 12 NYCRR
§195.1, which limits "similar" deductions authorized
by Section 193(1)(b) to 10 percent of the gross payments due to the
employee in the payroll period.
As set forth above, the DOL opinion makes clear that the DOL views
deductions from paychecks for overpayments or for the repayment of
loans as violative of Section 193, as are employer-mandated
payments by a separate employee payment. Such separate payments are
not permitted, according to the DOL opinion, if a refusal to repay
by an employee could result in disciplinary or retaliatory action.
However, where the employer "merely requests" such a
separate payment, such a request will not be a "prohibited
transaction" if the employer makes it clear that a refusal by
the employee to make such payment will not result in any
disciplinary or retaliatory action.
Finally, the DOL opinion notes that an employer may commence a
legal action against an employee to recover an overpayment or an
outstanding loan balance.
Employers should be cognizant of the restrictions articulated in
the DOL opinion, particularly in determining whether to provide
loans or advances to employees.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.