Supreme Court Declines To Hear Challenge To CFTC Authority

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in a case challenging the scope of the CFTC's anti-fraud authority.
United States Finance and Banking

The Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in Monex Deposit Co., et al. v. the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The case challenged the scope of the CFTC's anti-fraud authority; in particular, whether CFTC authority extends to contracts with the "actual delivery" of precious metals and to fraud unrelated to market manipulation. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that the CFTC's authority extended to the alleged misconduct. (A full summary of the Ninth Circuit decision is available here.)

Robert A. Schwartz, the CFTC Deputy General Counsel for Litigation, stated that the Supreme Court action "should put to rest any question of the CFTC's authority to redress fraud in commodity markets."

Primary Sources

  1. CFTC Press Release: Supreme Court Denies Defendants' Challenge to CFTC's Enforcement Authority
  2. U.S. Supreme Court, Denial of Certiorari: CFTC v. Monex Deposit Co., et al.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More