On June 25, 2020, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) voted to withdraw its proposed Regulation AT—which sought to regulate automated trading in a broad fashion—and replace it with amendments to Part 38 of its rules to address the potential risk to a designated contract market's (DCM) trading platform arising out of a disruption due to electronic trading.1 The proposed risk principles espouse a more narrow and principles-based approach than Regulation AT.
Through the proposal, the CFTC seeks to prevent disruptions or anomalies such as excessive messaging by malfunctioning systems, “fat finger” orders or erroneous manual messages that result in unintentionally large or off-price orders, and the loss of connection between an order management system and the trading platform. Regulators have, on a number of occasions, brought enforcement actions involving these types of disruptions.
The proposed rule would consist of three new Part 38 principles:
- Implementation of exchange rules applicable to market participants to prevent, detect, and mitigate market disruptions and system anomalies associated with electronic trading;
- Implementation of exchange-based pre-trade risk controls for all electronic orders; and
- Prompt notification to the CFTC by DCMs of any significant disruptions to their electronic trading platforms.
To illustrate how a DCM would be able to comply, the proposal includes proposed acceptable practices for a DCM to follow.
In dissenting to the risk principles proposal, Commissioner Rostin Behnam questioned the utility of the proposal, asking whether the risk principles are materially different than the status quo. Commissioner Behnam also highlighted that the absence of definitions for certain key terms may cause confusion among market participants.
Market participants are invited to comment on the proposed electronic risk trading principles. The comment period will be the latter of 60 days after the June 25 vote or 30 days following the proposed rule's publication in the Federal Register.
1 CFTC Release, https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8188-20.
Originally published by Mayer Brown, July 2020
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.