The August 21, 2012 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit to vacate EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
marks a material interpretation of EPA's authority under the
Clean Air Act - an "unsettling" departure from judicial
restraint (according to the dissent). To consider what this means
for power producers and other energy market participants,
Cadwalader held a teleconference discussion on Tuesday, September 4
about the implications of this important decision.
Hosted by Cadwalader bankruptcy partner
George Davis, this conference featured energy partner
Ken Irvin, who discussed the court's decision and its
impact on energy markets and generators, and litigation partner
David Williams, who discussed the different appellate review
options available to EPA.
The call also featured guest speakers
Lee Van Atta and
Ronald Moe of SAIC and
Matthew Mazzucchi of Houlihan Lokey, who addressed the impact
vacating CSAPR has on earnings and capital expenditures of
generators, which still face material costs for compliance with a
gauntlet of EPA regulation, including: Mercury and Air Toxics
Standards (MATS or Utility MACT), proposed Cooling Water Intake
Structures regulation, proposed disposal of Coal Combustion
Residuals regulation, and proposed Greenhouse Gas regulations.
UPDATE Click here to download the presentation
materials. Click here to download a recording of the
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Settling federal environmental enforcement actions is one of the most important environmental legal challenges faced by regulated entities, be they multi-national corporations, small family businesses...
After Sackett, the question on everyone’s mind was "How far does it go?" The first test of that question was the decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals – not known as a bastion of liberalism – in Belle Company v. Corps of Engineers, holding that a Corps jurisdictional determination is not final agency action subject to judicial review.
What are the politics of climate change? A new poll done by Stanford University and Resources for the Future suggests that the public may be more ready to regulate carbon carbon taxthan has previously been thought.
Guidance recently issued by the U.S. EPA details the Obama administration’s national strategy for encouraging municipalities to utilize existing and new green infrastructure to help alleviate climate change.