ARTICLE
5 August 2020

Antitrust Litigation Opportunity For Funds

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
Funds — through their portfolio companies — may have a significant antitrust opportunity against the major U.S. railroad companies.
United States Antitrust/Competition Law

Funds - through their portfolio companies - may have a significant antitrust opportunity against the major U.S. railroad companies.

Kramer Levin is representing Procter & Gamble in an antitrust lawsuit against BNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company (the Railroads). The action alleges that from 2003 - 2008 the Railroads participated in a price-fixing conspiracy whereby they charged uniform fuel surcharges to their customers that bore no relationship to their actual fuel costs. The complaint can be found here.

To date, there have been more than 90 substantially similar actions filed against the Railroads by the Railroads' major customers, which have been consolidated for pretrial purposes in a multidistrict litigation proceeding, Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. II), MDL No. 2925, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs reflect a broad spectrum of companies including major energy companies; utilitiesmining and minerals companies; chemicals and plastics companies; steel companies; construction materials companies; paper, pulp and packaging companies; agribusiness companies; food and beverage companies; waste management and recycling companies; logistics companies; consumer goods companies; and automakers.

All of these actions were filed in the past six months, after a long-standing putative class action dissolved when the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a denial by the district court of class certification. While the district court refused to grant class certification for technical reasons, the court repeatedly stated in written opinions that the case against the Railroads on the merits is strong.

Interested companies should obtain a rough idea of their U.S. rail freight costs from 2003 - 2008 as soon as possible, as the potential damages are diminishing by the day. While the statute of limitations was tolled during the class case, it began to run again in August 2019.

Under the U.S. federal antitrust laws, damages are automatically trebled.

Originally published 3 August 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.



Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More