ARTICLE
27 July 2020

Advertising Standards Authority Of Singapore Comments On The Rise In Feedback By Stakeholders And The Increasing Number Of High-Profile Ad Complaints

GA
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

Contributor

With firms representing more than 90 countries, each GALA member has the local expertise and experience in advertising, marketing and promotion law that will help your campaign achieve its objectives, and navigate the legal minefield successfully. GALA is a uniquely sensitive global resource whose members maintain frequent contact with each other to maximize the effectiveness of their collaborative efforts for their shared clients. GALA provides the premier worldwide resource to advertisers and agencies seeking solutions to problems involving the complex legal issues affecting today's marketplace.
The Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore (‘ASAS'), which was set up in 1976 to inter alia promote ethical advertising in Singapore, has played a crucial role over
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

The Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore ('ASAS'), which was set up in 1976 to inter alia promote ethical advertising in Singapore, has played a crucial role over the years. Its importance and significance, as the self-regulatory body of the advertising industry, have increased manifold in the past few years. The ASAS has also been pro-actively engaging with stakeholders for feedback. In this regard the ASAS received a total of 359 instances of feedback in 2019. This is a significant increase from previous years, and could perhaps be attributed to the ramped-up public awareness outreach efforts by the ASAS.

The said feedback has been in relation to a wide range of subject matter and areas of potential concern, for example:

31 instances of feedback were received on advertisements under the 'finance' category in 2019, pertaining mainly to remittance services and companies that offer investment opportunities. By way of an illustration, a consumer questioned a claim by a remittance business to have 'no sneaky charges' after SWIFT fees were applied on his transaction. The remittance business explained that as the transaction involved US dollars in a country where it is not the local currency, the local banks would impose SWIFT fees that were outside of the remittance business's control. The remittance business complied with ASAS's advice to include a warning to consumers to check with recipients if their banks charged additional fees during the remittance process.

A lot of feedback was received in relation to the use of 'brownface' in a NETS E-Pay advertisement, which was eventually taken down. The Infocomm Media Development Authority ('IMDA') issued a warning to the parties concerned. Advertisers were reminded to be mindful of racial sensitivities and not cause offence to ethnic groups when conducting their advertising campaigns.

The ASAS also received a lot of feedback in relation to advertisements by restaurants involving matters such as price and discount discrepancies in advertisements, or a lack of clarity in the description of food and beverage items on menus and in promotional materials or in relation to advertisements pertaining to food delivery apps.

In a continuous effort to encourage stakeholders to work together to ensure ethical advertising, the ASAS reminds advertisers not to overstate the benefits or returns of their products and services, while encouraging consumers to write in in case they come across advertisements which are not legal, decent, honest or truthful.

Originally published July 23, 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More