ARTICLE
7 August 2018

Update: Ninth Circuit to Review Hyundai

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
On July 27, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an order granting en banc review of its decision in Hyundai and Kia Fuel Econ. Litig., No. 15-56067, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626 ...
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On July 27, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an order granting en banc review of its decision in Hyundai and Kia Fuel Econ. Litig., No. 15-56067, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626 (Jan. 23, 2018). The Ninth Circuit also set oral argument for the week of September 24, 2018, in a separate ruling.

As we noted in our February 12, 2018 post, the Ninth Circuit's January 23 decision denying certification of a settlement class had provided defendants with a power tool in defending against class certification. (See https://classdismissed.mofo.com/false-advertising-claims/ninth-circuits-pro-defense-decision-in-hyundai-opens-the-door-for-class-certification-defenses/.) While the panel is reviewing the decision, however, the Ninth Circuit made clear that the case may not be cited as precedent in any case before the Ninth Circuit. We will provide relevant updates following the issuance of an opinion.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More