UK: The Achilleas - No New Generally Applicable Test

Last Updated: 17 May 2010
Article by Chirag Karia and David Semark

Sylvia Shipping Co Ltd v Progress Bulk Carriers Ltd [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm)

Key Facts

There has been much speculation as to the effect of 2009 decision of the House of Lords in "The Achilleas" on the proper approach to damages in contract. A judgment handed down by Mr Justice Hamblen on the 18th of March provides welcome clarification to the legal fraternity: there is no new generally applicable legal test of remoteness in damages. Below is a more detailed briefing note on the case written by David Semark and Chirag Karia of Quadrant Chambers, who acted for the successful Respondent in the case. John Passmore, also of Quadrant Chambers, was instructed for the Appellant.

While Mr Justice Hamblen's findings are of general importance to anyone involved in the assessment of contractual damages under English law, they are also of importance for the shipping industry. The Commercial Court has held that "The Achilleas" does not preclude a time-charterer from claiming loss of profits from an owner, where the owners' breach of charterparty leads to the charterer losing a sub-fixture.

Insight & analysis

  1. The judgment handed down in the Commercial Court on 18th March 2010 by Mr Justice Hamblen in The Sylvia provides further important guidance on the impact of the decision of the House of Lords in The Achilleas on the proper approach to damages in contract in general, and its effect on charterparty cases in particular.
  2. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held that where a vessel on time charter is redelivered late by charterers, an owner's damages are limited to the difference between the charter and market rates for the overrun period and that an owner cannot recover lost profits on a cancelled follow-on fixture. The issue in The Sylvia was whether a similar limit applied where the owner's breach of charter caused his time-charterer to lose a sub-fixture. The Court held that it did not.
  3. The issue came before the Court by way of an appeal from an arbitration award, in which the tribunal had found that owners had been in breach of their due-diligence and maintenance obligations, as result of which the Syliva had been detained by port-state control. This in turn led to charterers missing the cancelling date on their sub-fixture, which sub-charterers then cancelled. The substitute employment which charterers were able to find post-cancellation was less profitable than the cancelled fixture, and charterers claimed the difference from owners. The tribunal found in charterers' favour.
  4. The owners appealed, contending, in reliance on The Achilleas that the charterer's only recoverable loss was the difference between the charter and market rates for the period of the detention and that the profits lost on the cancelled sub-fixture were too remote to be recoverable.
  5. In order to decide the appeal, Mr Justice Hamblen had to ascertain the ratio dedidendi of The Achilleas. As he pointed out, there has been some confusion on this point due to the disparity between the two approaches adopted by their Lordships: (i) an orthodox approach, which asks whether at the time of concluding a particular contract, the parties would have contemplated whether the breach concerned would "in the ordinary course of things" cause the kind of loss claimed; and (ii) a broader approach, led by Lord Hoffman, which asks, in some "unusual" cases, whether "the context, surrounding circumstances or general understanding in the relevant market shows that a party would not reasonably have been regarded as assuming responsibility for such losses".
  6. After reviewing the speeches of their Lordships, and subsequent commentary on the case, Hamblen J concluded that:

    "In my judgment, the decision in The Achilleas results in an amalgam of the orthodox and broader approach. The orthodox approach remains the general test of remoteness applicable in the great majority of cases. However, there may be "unusual" cases, such as The Achilleas itself, in which the context, surrounding circumstances or general understanding in the relevant market make it necessary specifically to consider whether there has been an assumption of responsibility. This is most likely to be in those relatively rare cases where the application of the general test leads or may lead to an unquantifiable, unpredictable, uncontrollable or disproportionate liability or where there is clear evidence that such a liability would be contrary to market understanding and expectations."
  7. He added that "in the great majority of cases it will not be necessary specifically to address the issues of assumption of responsibility," holding that this was consistent with the approach taken in other post-Achilleas decisions, most importantly, the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in the non-shipping case of Supershield Ltd v. Siemens Building Technologies [2010] EWCA Civ 7.
  8. In an important passage for practitioners, arbitrators and the commercial community generally, the Judge emphasised further that, " is important that it be made clear that there is no new generally applicable legal test of remoteness in damages. It appears that in a number of cases, this is being argued and that decisions are being challenged for failing to recognise or apply the assumption of responsibility test. This results in confusion and uncertainty."
  9. Applying these principles to the Tribunal's decision, Mr Justice Hamblen held that they had not erred in law by concluding that lost profits on a sub-fixture lost due to an owner's breach of contract were not too remote. He relied on the fact that period charters often contain an express liberty to sub-let, and that there is both judicial and academic authority for the view that they are recoverable. In particular, in The Derby [1984] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 635, Hobhouse J had clearly recognised that such a claim could properly be made. He also pointed out that where a sub-fixture is lost, there will often be a loss regardless of market considerations because charterers will have to find substitute employment with the vessel in a distressed position.
  10. There were in addition, important difference between The Achilleas and the facts of The Sylvia. In particular there was no market understanding or expectation that a charterers' loss is limited to the difference between the charter and market rates for the period of the delay caused by the owner's breach. On the contrary, the general understanding – supported by Hobhouse J's judgment in The Derby and results in arbitral references and assumptions made in court cases – was that damages could be recovered for loss of a sub-fixture. Also, it was less likely that an unquantifiable loss would arise because the lost sub-charter could never be longer than the length of the head charter itself, and, in many cases the cancelled sub-fixture would be a voyage charter in any event.
  11. On this basis, the Owners' appeal was dismissed. Leave to appeal was also refused, so the judgment of Hamblen J is the last word on this issue for the moment.
  12. Chirag Karia of Quadrant Chambers acted for the successful Charterers. John Passmore, also of Quadrant Chambers, acted for the Appellant Owners.
  13. A copy of the judgment can be downloaded from BAILII at: .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.