UK: A New Weapon in the Arsenal for the Fight Against Corruption: The U.K. Bribery Act of 2010

After more than a decade of deliberation, the United Kingdom enacted new anti-corruption legislation on April 8, 2010. The "Bribery Act" replaces a patchwork of common law and statutory offenses dating back to 1889, and it is designed to simplify and modernize the United Kingdom's current restrictions on bribery. The U.K. Bribery Act differs from the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") in several key respects, including the addition of a new corporate offense for failing to prevent bribery and an outright ban on facilitating payments.

The Bribery Act criminalizes paying a bribe to a foreign public official, as well as offering, promising, requesting, accepting, or agreeing to receive a bribe. The jurisdictional principles of the Bribery Act are almost identical to those of the FCPA, in that the U.K. law applies to bribes made on U.K. soil by foreign companies and bribes made overseas by U.K. citizens, including businesses, passport holders, and residents. Unlike the FCPA, the Act's restrictions encompass both domestic private corruption and the overseas bribery of foreign officials. Furthermore, where a company commits an act of bribery with the "consent or connivance" of a senior officer, that individual may also face personal criminal liability. Given the broad reach of the new Act, companies based in and outside of the U.K. must pay careful attention to the nuances of the law and the ways in which it differs from the FCPA.

Failure To Prevent Bribery

The Act introduces a corporate offense for failing to prevent bribery by persons associated with any entity that conducts any part of its business in the U.K., without respect to its corporate citizenship or where the conduct occurred. Commercial organizations violate this section of the Act where a person associated with the organization commits an act of corruption with the intention of obtaining or retaining business or of obtaining or retaining an advantage in the conduct of business for the organization. For purposes of this legislation, a person is deemed to be "associated" with a commercial organization if he or she performs services for or on behalf of the organization, without regard to whether the person is an employee, agent, or subsidiary company.

The corporate offense is subject to strict liability. Earlier drafts of the legislation imposed liability only if the organization was negligent in failing to prevent bribery. These limitations were excluded from the final version of the Act, and a commercial organization can, therefore, be found guilty of an offense regardless of its state of mind or the state of mind of those who control it. Despite this far-reaching prohibition, the Act contains a statutory defense whereby an organization can escape liability by showing that it had in place "adequate procedures" designed to prevent bribery. Although the Act does not define "adequate procedures," it imposes a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to publish relevant guidance. While that guidance will not be prescriptive, the government has indicated that it will reflect a proportionate, risk-based approach to what constitutes "adequate procedures." The "failure to prevent" offense will not become binding until after that guidance is published and a grace period in which organizations will have the opportunity to consider the guidance and implement appropriate anti-bribery procedures has passed. It is anticipated that the offense will come into force in October 2010.

No Exception for Facilitating Payments

The Bribery Act contains no exception akin to the FCPA's treatment of facilitating or "grease" payments. To the contrary, the Bribery Act contains an outright ban on all bribery. Opponents challenged this aspect of the Act, noting that it would prohibit activities permitted in jurisdictions such as the U.S. and place U.K. businesses at a commercial disadvantage. The fears of such consequences on competition appear overblown. Because the FCPA's exception for "facilitating payments" provides a notoriously unreliable legal standard, many U.S. companies opt to ban such payments altogether. Indeed, in this respect, the Bribery Act is in line with broader trends in anti-corruption law. Only last year, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") called for member countries to prohibit facilitating payments. For more information about the facilitating payment exception under the FCPA, see Jones Day Commentary, " OECD Calls for an End to Facilitating Payments Exception " (December 2009).


The Bribery Act also increases the penalties applicable to corrupt payments under U.K. law. A natural person convicted on indictment of an offense faces a maximum penalty of up to 10 years (formerly seven years), in addition to any fine imposed. Corporations face an unlimited fine under the Bribery Act. As importantly, corporations convicted of a corruption offense can be subject to debarment from selection for public contracts under the Public Contracts Regulations of 2006, which implemented the European Union Public Sector Procurement Directive of 2004.

Other Anti-Corruption Developments in the United Kingdom

The enactment of the Bribery Act capped a particularly busy first quarter for anti-corruption prosecutors in the U.K. More anti-bribery and corruption activity by the Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") as well as the U.K.'s financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority ("FSA"), has led to a number of settlements, sizable fines, and criminal convictions.

U.K. authorities are poised to ramp up all manner of enforcement activities and have encouraged more companies to self-report violations. Last year, the SFO issued a guide to self-reporting, "Approach of the Serious Fraud Office to Dealing with Overseas Corruption" ("Guide"), designed to encourage companies to bring violations to the attention of the U.K. enforcement authorities in exchange for the prospect of lighter penalties, if in the interests of justice.

As recent comments by a high-ranking justice official in the United Kingdom suggest, however, the SFO does not have the same authority as the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve cases by agreement. On March 26, 2010, a British judge warned the head of the SFO, Richard Alderman, that he may recommend the terms of plea agreements for corruption prosecutions, but the final decision remains with the court in all cases. The court's objections appear to have arisen primarily from the fact that plea agreements in the U.K. have traditionally been subject to a greater degree of judicial consideration and discretion than in the United States, where prosecutors have more freedom to negotiate the terms. The judge's concerns may have been triggered in part by the disparity between the $12.7 million fine paid to the U.K. by one corporation and the $27.5 million in fines and penalties that the same company paid to U.S. authorities.

Divergent U.K.–U.S. Enforcement Philosophies

Publicly reported events suggest that, despite the new U.K. legislation and mutual expressions of support for the effort to stamp out international corruption, authorities in the U.S. and the U.K. differ in their approach to enforcement. In recent years, the DOJ has picked up at least one prosecution under the FCPA after the SFO very publicly declined to pursue corruption charges in a highly charged political environment. It thus comes as no surprise that, even as the U.K. ramps up enforcement, a rift may still exist between the manner in which each country applies its ban on foreign bribery.

In early March, SFO head Alderman received press attention for remarks that he made during a public discussion of the U.K.'s new Bribery Bill. Mr. Alderman suggested that there might be circumstances in which the SFO would not take action even when "a bribe" (his characterization) had been paid. Mr. Alderman pointed to mitigating "moral and ethical" difficulties that might exist in a case where prosecution was declined, and he noted that in some circumstances there could be a lack of intention on the part of the payer to act corruptly. The circumstances about which Mr. Alderman was speaking involved granting a foreign official a 51 percent stake in a subsidiary in explicit exchange for the right of that subsidiary to continue a profitable business in a country. As reported by the SFO, Mr. Alderman stated:

While we cannot compromise overall ethical standards, there needs to be considerable sensitivity as to how those standards play out....

And so, what does this mean? Let me give you an example. I was approached by the Board of a corporate that is involved in one of these countries. They had a 100 percent subsidiary. This was becoming very profitable and so they received an approach from the Government. They were told that if they wanted to continue to do business in the country then they would need to transfer a 51 percent interest in the subsidiary to the family of the President. That gave rise to all sorts of worries for them for obvious reasons. One of these was whether or not the SFO would take the view that payment in this way was a bribe. They were concerned we might investigate and prosecute. I assured them that I would have no intention of doing that whatsoever. I said I recognised the very great difficulty of the moral and ethical position that they were in. This was something they would have to resolve. What I could do though was to give them comfort that whatever they did, we would be sensitive to the circumstances here and would not seek to take any action, even if technically the transfer of the interest in the subsidiary constituted a bribe. They found that very helpful.

It appears doubtful that the DOJ or the SEC would share Mr. Alderman's interpretation of these facts. Indeed, Mr. Alderman subsequently suggested that these remarks were motivated by a desire to bring the right cases before criminal juries and concentrate the SFO's resources on the egregious cases. Businesses should not, therefore, be lulled into a false sense of security by Mr. Alderman's comments, whether under U.S. or U.K. law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Harriet Territt
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions