UK: IP Snapshot - March 2010

Last Updated: 7 April 2010
Article by Nick Beckett, Isabel Davies and Tom Scourfield

Bringing you monthly news of key developments in intellectual property law.

Enercon Gmbh v OHIM, T-472/07, General Court (Sixth Chamber), 3 February 2010

The General Court upheld an OHIM decision to refuse the registration as a Community Trade Mark ("CTM") of the word 'ENERCON' by Enercon Gmbh ("Enercon"). The mark was rejected following an opposition by Hasbro Inc ("Hasbro"). Hasbro claimed likelihood of confusion with its CTM, 'TRANSFORMERS ENERGON,' in connection with identical products in the same class.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

O2 (Germany) GmbH & Co. KG v OHIM, EU General Court, 10 February 2010

The EU General Court annulled a decision of the OHIM Board of Appeal which had rejected an application of O2 Germany to register the word sign 'HOMEZONE' as a Community trade mark for telecoms related goods and services in class 9, 38 and 42.
The Board of Appeal had found that the sign 'HOMEZONE' lacked distinctive character and consisted exclusively of signs, which could designate the characteristics of the goods and services concerned. The EU General Court overruled this decision stating that the Board of Appeal had failed to justify its conclusions since it did not assess the distinctiveness of the sign itself but merely referred to examples given by the examiner in support of his reasoning.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Nanjing Automobile (Group) Corporation & Ors v MG Sports and Racing Europe Limited, William James Riley, High Court, 19 February 2010

The High Court upheld a claim for trade mark infringement and passing off in favour of Nanjing Automobile Group ("NAG"), who were the purchasers of most of the assets and trade marks of MG Rover Group, in particular the trade marks that are associated with the famous MG Sports car. The Judge rejected the Defendants counter-claim for orders revoking the trade mark registrations in NAG's name.

For the full text of the decision click here .

Rahmi Özdemir, residing in Dreieich (Germany) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Aktieselskabet af 21. November 2001 Case T-11/09

The EU General Court (formerly the CFI) has upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that there was a likelihood of confusion under Article 8(1)(b) of the CTM Regulation (40/94/EEC, now replaced by 2009/207/EC) between the Community trade mark (CTM) for JACK & JONES and a proposed CTM for JAMES JONES, for clothing in class 25. The court confirmed that the board was correct to find that the marks were similar visually and phonetically, and relatively similar conceptually.

The Court agreed that taking into account that the marks comprised a very short first word, the first two letters of which were identical, and an identical second word, the difference attributable to the ampersand in the CTM was not enough to conclude that the marks were dissimilar. The court reached a similar conclusion in relation to the phonetic similarity: the ampersand was commonly used and would not be very striking phonetically. In relation to conceptual similarity, it was conceivable that consumers might interpret the marks as referring to the same person. The court concluded that as the goods were identical, the marks similar, and the average consumer's level of attention would not be high, there was the requisite likelihood of confusion.

For the full text of the decision, click here .


Research in Motion UK Limited v Motorola Inc [2010] EWHC 288 (Pat) 3 Feb 2010.

This patent infringement and invalidity case resulted in a finding of non-infringement and invalidity of the patent in suit. It is interesting because of the Arnold J's remarks in respect of construction, the application of the identification of an infringement under Section 60(1)(2) and the common general knowledge held by the skilled person.

For the full text of our Law-Now on this decision, click here.

Nokia GmbH v IP Com/ IPCom v (1) Nokia UK Ltd (2) Nokia Corporation [2009] EWHC 3482 (Pat)

In consideration of disclosure, construction, infringement, insufficiency and patentability, the approach adopted by the High Court in these two patent infringement/invalidity cases follows the normal course. However, the judgement by Floyd J is noteworthy in as much as the documents cited by the counterclaimant to invalidate them were the industry standards for GSM and GPRS and, as such, were deemed to be common general knowledge.

For the full text of our Law-Now on this decision, click here .

Court of Appeal decision in Alan Nuttall Limited and Fri-Jado UK Limited and another - 24 November 2009

The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal from the decision of the High Court that a patent for a cabinet for the display of hot food items, which used an air curtain at the front of the cabinet to permit customers easily to take food items whilst maintaining the temperature in the cabinet, was valid and infringed. In reaching its decision, on the issue of obviousness, the Court of Appeal in a unanimous judgment said that obviousness was very much a question for the trial judge and an appellate court should only interfere if the trial judge had reached a decision, which was plainly untenable. In this case, the Court of Appeal found that the trial judge had directly himself correctly at law so there was no reason for the Court of Appeal to interfere.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

Virgin Atlantic v Premium Aircraft, Court of Appeal, 21 December 2009

The Court of Appeal has refused to stay an enquiry into damages for patent infringement pending a decision on validity by the Technical Board of Appeal. However, it allowed a carve out to the terms of a final injunction, subject to conditions, to allow the infringer to fulfil an order for a relatively small number of further infringing items.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

Neutrokine-alpha/HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES INC., T 0018/09 - 3.3.08, 21 October 2009

The Board of Appeal of the EPO has allowed an appeal from the decision of the opposition division to revoke a European patent for the protein known as Neutrokine-α. In particular, the board held that there was sufficient disclosure in the patent to satisfy the requirement for patentability that the invention is "susceptible of industrial application". This appeal was expedited at the request of the Court of Appeal, who were due to hear an appeal from the High Court decision holding the UK equivalent of this patent invalid.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc. [2010] EWCA Civ 33, 9 February 2010

Jacob LJ upheld the decision of Kitchin J that the patent-in-suit was invalid for lack of industrial application. A patent to an isolated gene sequence without a plausible and precise disclosure of how it can be used is contrary to Art. 52 EPC.
The court held the patent invalid despite the EPO Board of Appeal holding that the patent was valid just a few months earlier. Jacob LJ emphasised that while the UK courts follow any principles of law clearly laid down by the Boards of Appeal, they "are not bound to follow, or even give deference to, the Board's findings of fact". He reviewed and applied the legal principles established by the Boards regarding industrial application but stressed that the Boards repeatedly held that each case must be decided on its own facts. Preferring the findings of fact of Kitchin J to the Board of Appeal's, Jacob LJ stressed that the High Court's scrutiny of evidence is more thorough and that the Board's decision rested partly on evidence not before the UK courts. He also respectfully disagreed with specific findings of the Board.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG, Court of Appeal 17 February 2010

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision that
Novartis' patent for a sustained release formulation of fluvastatin was obvious. The problem presented in the patent was illusory – it was not a problem because fluvastatin is not so highly soluble that the skilled person would expect it be impossible or difficult to make a sustained release form. The Court provided a detailed analysis of obviousness in the UK Courts and compares the approach in the UK to the problem-solution approach used by the EPO.

For the full text of the decision, click here .


Company Names Tribunal Issues Practice Note on "Without Prejudice Material" – 11 Feb 2010

The Company Names Tribunal has published a practice note on whether negotiations between a holder of a company name and a party wishing to object to the registration should be considered 'without prejudice' and hence excluded from consideration as evidence in the subsequent determination of the case at the Company Names Tribunal.

For the full text of this practice note, click here .

New legislation to implement simplified customs procedure laid before Parliament

The Goods Infringing Intellectual Property Rights (Customs) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 (the 2020 Regulations) have been laid before Parliament. The 2010 Regulations are intended to bring the UK customs procedures fully into line with Council Regulation 1383/2003 (the Council Regulation). Significantly for brand owners, this includes providing for a "simplified procedure" which will allow officers at the border to destroy goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right either with the agreement of one of the interested parties or where the interested parties fail to provide any response when offered the opportunity to agree or object to the abandonment of the goods.

For the full text of our Law-Now update on this decision, click here .

The Queen on the application of Binyam Mohamed - v - Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, 10 February 2010, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

The issue was whether, as the Foreign Secretary contended, seven short subparagraphs should be removed from the published version of a judgment, given by the High Court on 21 August 2008. The key ground claimed was that their publication would infringe the 'control principle' and the fact that the Foreign Secretary had stated in more than one Public Interest Immunity Certificate that such publication would lead to a real risk of serious harm to the national security of the UK.

All three members of the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision that the seven paragraphs should be published.

For the full text of the decision, click here .

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 31/03/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.