ARTICLE
23 March 2010

Pay-When-Paid Clauses: The Importance Of Updating Insolvency Provisions

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

A Court of Appeal decision from last Thursday confirms that to be effective "pay-when-paid" clauses in construction contracts need to be drafted to identify the specific types of insolvency situation where the clause will operate.
United Kingdom Real Estate and Construction

A Court of Appeal decision from last Thursday confirms that to be effective "pay-when-paid" clauses in construction contracts need to be drafted to identify the specific types of insolvency situation where the clause will operate. We consider in two articles the implications of this case for construction contracts (Administration through an out of court method not caught by "pay when paid" clause) (http://tinyurl.com/ylmfudl) and for insolvency situations generally (Keep your insolvency event clauses up to date) (http://tinyurl.com/yg8sxkz).

Reference: William Hare Limited v Shepherd Construction Limited [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (http://tinyurl.com/ylb8nsv).

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 22/03/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More