Scottish Devolution: The Story Continues...

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

St Andrews Day 2009 saw the Scottish Government launch their white paper on Scotland's constitutional future and it promised that a Referendum Bill would be introduced early in 2010.
United Kingdom Government, Public Sector

St Andrews Day 2009 saw the Scottish Government launch their white paper on Scotland's constitutional future (http://tinyurl.com/ya49bga) and it promised that a Referendum Bill would be introduced early in 2010. Following on from that, and after it became clear that a Referendum Bill would be defeated in the Scottish Parliament (the SNP government is a minority government), last week saw the Scottish Government publish its draft Referendum Bill.

The Bill will now be put to consultation and it proposes that the Scottish people be asked two questions in a referendum:

  • Question 1 relates to increased powers and responsibilities for the Scottish Parliament and the consultation paper proposes two possible questions: either the Calman Commission proposals (the headline change being limited fiscal independence with the Scottish Parliament being required to set income tax rates for Scotland above a based rate of 10%) or "Devolution Max" (broad autonomy for Scotland in almost all areas other than Defence and Foreign Affairs). The Scottish Government prefers the second question;
  • Question 2 is the independence question. The proposed formulation is to asked voters to agree or disagree with the proposition that the Scottish Parliament's powers should be extended to enable independence to be achieved.

Much ado about nothing? Perhaps. The draft Bill, if introduced, has little prospect at present of passing through the Scottish Parliament. If it did, time will be tight to have a referendum before the next Scottish Parliament election on 5 May 2011 and, in any event, opinion polls have never yet suggested a majority of Scots favour independence. If all that is overcome, and a "yes" vote were secured on Question 2, the Scottish Government would have a mandate to negotiate Scotland's exit from the Union - a process that would take years and most probably require approval by a further referendum.

Whilst the Scottish Government is continuing with its central policy commitment, it appears that there are a number of factors which are likely to ensure the status quo continues for the foreseeable future.

The Scottish Government's consultation paper is available here (http://tinyurl.com/yevtfap).

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 03/02/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More