UK: Making A Monkey Out Of Inventorship

The Question Of Non-Human Inventors Raises A Number Of Dilemmas
Last Updated: 26 September 2019
Article by Phillips & Leigh

(An earlier version of this article by Arthur Boff was published in CIPA Journal, February 2016; this revised version, with thanks to Jim Boff for further suggestions, first published 28th August 2019.)

The recent attempt to achieve recognition for the Dabus AI system as an inventor is a confrontation many have seen coming. It is preceded by years of speculation about "computational creativity" and the question of whether a computer, suitably prepared to undertake investigations, could be seen as an inventor – see, for instance, Ryan Abbott's discussion of the question in Hal the Innovator.

In considering this question, it may be worth considering that inventive behaviour on the part of non-humans has been observed in the wild. Our primate cousins exhibit widely documented examples of tool use, as do other animals; certain species of crows and ravens are famous for it.

An interesting thought experiment is suggested by the famous "monkey selfie" case; that case related to copyright, but there are overlapping principles, in that the law holds that just as copyright ownership arises from the work of an identifiable author and their status (for instance, whether it was work done to hire), so too does patent law hold that a patent must be based on the work of an identifiable inventor, with ownership of the patent following on from that.

Let's suppose a naturalist in the wild is observing a chimpanzee. The chimpanzee devises a tool which, whilst simple, displays clearly novel and inventive features. Supposing the naturalist is well-informed about intellectual property, and decides to submit a patent application for the tool the chimp has devised.

Who should be named as the inventor? Naming the chimpanzee as the inventor would have the benefit of being true, but is not necessarily supported by the law, particularly in the wake of the monkey selfie case ruling against animal ownership of copyright. Naming the naturalist as the inventor would be incorrect. Naming nobody as the inventor is not, in general, an option; it used to be in the case of "patents of importation", but these have largely disappeared from the legal sphere.

For that matter, does the naturalist even have the right to make the application in the first place? On the one hand, the naturalist didn't come up with the concept themselves. On the other hand, we wouldn't have the benefit of the invention at all if the naturalist hadn't reported it in some fashion, and they surely deserve some reward for that. On one foot (which on a chimpanzee can be just as dextrous as a hand), the naturalist was making observations as a scientist, and we don't give patents for scientific discoveries. On the other foot, we give patents for inventive applications of scientific discoveries all the time (although since the Alice case confusion in the US over patentable subject matter has made this more difficult).

If the reader is sceptical about the possibility of a chimp coming up with a simple tool that humans have not come up with, let's replace the chimp with a New Caledonian crow, who devises tools for its own use. The physiological differences between crows and primates are obvious to human and crow alike, and tool-making crows will have put far more thought than many humans into how a tool could be adapted for use by beak and talon. It is entirely conceivable that a crow could invent a tool with features novel and inventive simply because of the unique challenges of the technical field the crow is working in.

Or if the idea of inventive animals feels like too much of a fantasy, let's take a left turn into science fiction. Let's imagine some aliens irresponsibly crash their spaceship in your back garden. First on the scene, you loot the starship and take the aliens' faster-than-light hyperdrive, dismantle it, discover the principles behind its operation, and file for a patent for it; you are aided in this task by the aliens' instruction manual, which bizarrely enough they happened to translate into English, so you undertake no particular creative effort here.

Who is the rightful owner of the patent in this case? The aliens have no particular status in terrestrial law; if an animal cannot own IP, and a computer can't, that suggests a general principle that only humans can own IP, after all. (Thomas Jerome Newton, the alien played by David Bowie in The Man Who Fell To Earth, only acquires his patents by masquerading as a human being – and it's not clear whether he's the genuine inventor there or merely cribbed some notes from one of his species' textbooks. Arguably, his trouble with the government arises from him deceiving the US Patent Office...) At the same time, it's hardly true to say that you have invented anything in this case, because you have undertaken no inventive activity in your own right.

These examples are whimsical, but there's a point to be made here. If a human being doesn't deserve a patent simply for observing and transcribing some unexpected inventive activity on the part of an animal, or on the part of an alien from another planet, why should a human being get a patent from observing and transcribing some unexpected inventive activity on the part of an AI system? This is a question which will only become more acute as AI systems with greater autonomy are developed.

More broadly, the concept of inventorship and identifying the inventor is given extreme importance at the early stages of the patent application process. Once the inventor has been identified, in more or less all cases their identity largely becomes irrelevant when it comes to questions of the validity of a patent; it is in questions of ownership that the identity and status of the inventor is of most importance.

Consequently, one can imagine an invention which is entirely novel and inventive, and by that measure is deserving of patent protection, but at the same time is incapable of receiving protection simply because no specific human or set of humans can be positively identified as inventing it. The current notion that the inventor of an invention arrived at by a computer is the person who made arrangements to set the computer to work on the problem in the first place is at best a stopgap measure, because it cannot account for inventions which arise as an unexpected consequence of an AI's activity – inventions which nobody specifically asked the AI to devise, but which the AI devised in the course of their work anyway.

Reaching a self-consistent and future-proof answer to the question of who owns the rights to an invention generated by a non-human entity may require consideration of the questions:

  • Does inventorship require more than mere discovery?
  • If inventorship requires more than mere discovery, is a person who first observes an invention made by a non-human entity an inventor?
  • If the owner of an artificial intelligence is deemed the owner of an invention made by the artificial intelligence, is the owner of an animal deemed the owner of an invention made by the animal?
  • Is there a material difference between inventions made by owned entities and by free entities?
  • When assessing inventive step does one have to consider from the perspective only of unaided humans, humans using cybernetic assistance, or modified humans having cybernetic implants/interfaces? (Supposing a wonderful dementia cure is developed which entails providing artificial intelligence-based assistance to a patient's cognitive processes; would the patient then become unable to be an inventor, because it wouldn't be clear whether any specific idea they devised originated in their AI-based cognitive implant or in their biological grey matter?)
  • Is the concept of inventorship outdated, save as a factor in determining relative rights in inventions?

Of course, if an animal or computer can be an inventor, could they also constitute members of the public for the purposes of prior art disclosure? Non-confidential disclosure to a crow may not seem like much of a risk to novelty, but some corvids can mimic and repeat human speech; computers may be imbued with a sort of creativity, but can they be taught about confidentiality? Ryan Abbot talks about "Hal the Innovator", but those who have watched 2001: A Space Odyssey also know that Hal is a lip-reader.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions