Worldwide: Bank Regulatory News And Trends - 1 July 2019

Last Updated: 4 July 2019
Article by DLA Piper

Fed releases stress test and CCAR results: big banks well capitalized and most meet capital planning expectations. The much anticipated results of the Federal Reserve's two annual evaluations of 18 major US banks' capacity to withstand a severe (though hypothetical) recession demonstrate that the nation's largest banks have strong capital levels and are, for the most part, meeting supervisory expectations for capital planning. The Fed on June 21 released the results of the supervisory stress tests mandated by Dodd-Frank. And on June 27, the Fed released the results of its Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Only the 18 largest and most complex banks were tested this year, as smaller and less complex banks have been put on a two-year testing cycle under the banking regulatory overhaul law enacted in May 2018. The stress tests revealed that, "The nation's largest banks are significantly stronger than before the crisis and would be well-positioned to support the economy even after a severe shock," in the words of Randal Quarles, the Fed's vice chair for supervision. The Fed reported that since 2009, the common equity capital at the 18 firms has increased by more than $680 billion. The CCAR determined that most of the major banks have capital levels sufficient to absorb losses and continue lending to households and businesses even in times of economic downturn, and that large banks have more than doubled their capital levels since the financial crisis. While the Fed did not object to the capital plans of any of the 18 firms, it did issue a "conditional non-objection" to the capital distribution plan of the US holding company of one major foreign bank and is requiring that bank to address "limited weaknesses identified from the test." Two other US-based banks were able to maintain their post-stress regulatory capital ratios above minimum requirements in the severely adverse scenario only after submitting adjusted capital actions.

23 states join licensing agreement for fintechs. A diverse group of states, large and small and from coast to coast, have joined a multistate agreement to standardize the licensing process for money transmitters and other money services businesses. According to a June 24 announcement from the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, the pact would greatly streamline the MSB licensing process. Under the agreement, if one state reviews key elements of state licensing for a money transmitter – IT, cybersecurity, business plan, background check, and BSA compliance – then other participating states agree to accept the findings. The multistate compact, first announced in February 2018 with seven states participating, was intended to ease the burdensome state-by-state process for money service businesses, including fintech firms, trying to expand nationwide. CSBS said the goal is to have all states on board by next year as part of a larger effort to streamline nonbank supervision, called Vision 2020. The first phase of the pilot program combines initial licensing requirements into one process so the applicant does not need to refile for each state, with the lead state communicating its certification to the other states for approval. In the second phase, each state reviews any remaining, state-specific requirements before making a decision on a license. According to CSBS, 15 companies are in the second pilot and have received 72 licenses as of June 20.

Fed & CFPB issue final amendments to Reg CC inflation adjustment. The Federal Reserve Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on June 24 jointly published amendments to Regulation CC to implement a statutory requirement to adjust for inflation the dollar amounts depository institutions must make available to their customers. Under the Final Rule, to be published in the Federal Register, the amendments apply in circumstances ranging from next business day withdrawal of certain check deposits to setting the threshold amount for determining whether an account has been repeatedly withdrawn. Reg CC implements the Expedited Funds Availability Act of 1987 and the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act) of 2003. Dodd-Frank amended the EFA Act to grant CFPB and the Fed joint rulemaking authority for funds-availability schedules, disclosure policies, payment of interest, and other EFA Act provisions implemented by Regulation CC, and required that the dollar amounts be inflation-adjusted every five years by the annual percentage increase in the CPI. Additional amendments in the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, the Dodd-Frank rollback law enacted last year, are also incorporated in the Final Rule. The compliance date for the adjusted amounts is July 1, 2020.

Legislation proposed to enhance state enforcement of banks. Two California Democratic lawmakers are teaming up on a legislative initiative to strengthen the authority of state attorneys general and other law enforcement officials to issue subpoenas during the course of investigations into compliance with state law by national banks. Senator Kamala Harris, also a candidate for the her party's nomination for the presidency, and Representative Katie Porter have announced plans tointroduce versions of the Accountability for Wall Street Executives Act of 2019 in their respective Congressional chambers. According to a one-pager issued by Senator Harris's office, a 2009 Supreme Court ruling determined that state AGs are preempted from using the "visitorial" oversight of federally-chartered banks, ending what the senator termed a decades-long cooperative arrangement between state law enforcement officials and federal banking regulators and giving exclusive enforcement authority to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The proposed legislation would clarify that state AGs have visitorial authority to conduct oversight of federally-chartered national banks to issue subpoenas to inspect bank records and interview bank executives, and "repair" language in the National Bank Act that the Supreme Court interpreted as limiting those powers. The senator said the measure would "ensure there will always be at least two cops on the block." Two other presidential contenders, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) are listed as original co-sponsors of the bill.

CFPB extends comment period on HDMA proposed rule. The CFPB is extending the public comment period on its advance notice of proposed rulemaking on the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act to October 15, 2019. The June 27 announcement of the extension notes that the original deadline for comments was July 8, 60 days after the proposed rule was first published in the Federal Register, and the bureau said the extension was sought by both industry trade associations and consumer advocacy groups. The CFPB proposal seeks comment and information from the public on whether to have changes to the data points the Bureau's October 2015 final rule implementing HMDA added to Regulation C or revised to require additional information, and also requests public input on the requirement that institutions report certain business- or commercial-purpose transactions under Regulation C. In a related move, CFPB will issue a notice to reopen the comment period (which had closed on June 12) on certain aspects of its notice of proposed rulemaking on coverage thresholds under the HMDA rules.

FSB chair seeks international cooperation to avoid market fragmentation. On the eve of the June 28-29 G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, Financial Stability Board Chair Randal Quarles highlighted progress achieved in post-financial crisis reforms and outlined key themes and priorities going forward to promote "an integrated global financial system – an open and resilient financial system, grounded in agreed international standards." In a June 24 letter to G-20 leaders, Quarles said FSB would continue to monitor emerging risk areas, such as rising corporate and public debt levels. He also called for harnessing technological innovations to contain risks, while at the same time responding to the potential risks posed by some of those innovations, such as crypto-assets. A progress report issued on June 25 finds that the new regulatory framework sought by the G20 is "largely in place" but also notes that "implementation is not complete and remains uneven across reform areas." Four core reform areas identified in the progress report include more timely regulatory adoption of core Basel III elements; ending too-big-to fail, which has advanced for GSIBs but not as much for less prominent financial institutions, including non-banks; making derivatives markets safer; and strengthening oversight of non-bank financial intermediation. In an opening statement for a June 25 press briefing, Quarles noted that the Japanese G20 hosts had asked FSB to look into ways to reduce market fragmentation along geographic lines, and he noted that financial regulation and supervision can cause "cross-border frictions in financial activities that are international in nature." In response, FSB's report focused on cross-border trading and clearing of over-the-counter derivatives, cross-border management of capital and liquidity, and international sharing of data and other information. FSB, based in Basel, Switzerland, was established in 2009 and includes all the G20 economies. Quarles also serves as the Federal Reserve's vice chair for supervision.

Basel Committee finalizes changes in treatment of client cleared derivatives and leveraged ratio disclosure requirements. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will revise the leverage ratio treatment of client cleared derivatives to align it with the standardized approach to measuring counterparty credit risk exposures (SA-CCR). In a June 26 announcement, BCBS explained that this treatment will allow for cash and non-cash forms of initial and variation margin received from a client to offset the replacement cost and potential future exposure for client cleared derivatives only. "This limited revision balances the robustness of the leverage ratio as a non-risk-based safeguard against unsustainable sources of leverage with the policy objective set by the G20 Leaders to promote central clearing of standardized derivative contracts," the Committee stated. BCBS also issued revisions to require banks to disclose their leverage ratios based on quarter-end and daily average values of securities financing transactions in an effort to address the practice of "window dressing," in which temporary reductions of transaction volumes around reference dates lead to public disclosure of artificially elevated leverage ratios. BCBS, whose 45 members comprise central banks and bank supervisors from 28 jurisdictions, is the primary global standard setter for the prudential regulation of banks.

NCUA delays RBC rule by two years. A divided National Credit Union Association Board on June 20 voted, for the second time, to delay the effective date of its risk-based capital rule to January 1, 2022. The vote on the proposed rule that incorporates the delay was 2-1. NCUA Board Chairman Rodney Hood said in June 26 statement that the delay would provide more time for study. "This is an appropriate time to consider additional improvements to the risk-based capital rule," Hood said. "We have a strong economy, and credit unions are very well-capitalized, with a net worth above 11 percent." But Board member Todd Harper, who cast the sole dissenting vote, said credit union regulators should follow the example of banking regulators who have imposed risk-based capital requirements on banks in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Also opposing the delay were the ABA and Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who are not typically on the same side of many issues. "Since 2014, every bank in the country has had to adopt and comply with risk-based capital rules recommended by regulators around the world," ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols said. "It defies simple logic that the NCUA would propose again to delay imposing comparable rules for the nation's credit unions, when the agency is simultaneously allowing and encouraging credit unions to operate exactly like banks." Senator Brown said, "I am disturbed that ten years after the financial crisis, the NCUA is once again delaying important rules to increase capital at large credit unions. I commend Board Member Harper for opposing this unnecessary extension and demanding that NCUA focus on strengthening supervision and identifying risks to credit unions." NCUA originally approved the rule in 2015 and scheduled it to go into effect at the beginning of this year. Last October the Board unanimously approved delaying the effective date to January 1, 2020, and raised the asset threshold for a complex credit union from $100 million to $500 million. Comments on the proposed rule must be received within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Credit unions falling short of and straying from their mission, ABA-funded study finds; trade groups push back. A new study has determined that the credit-union industry is failing to live up to its statutory mission to provide financial services to borrowers of modest means and is calling for stronger enforcement to ensure that mission is achieved. The study, which was funded by the American Bankers Association but conducted independently by Federal Financial Analytics, recommends that the NCUA, the federal regulator of the sector, "go beyond its current policy of measuring only total credit union loan volume" and instead "measure what types of loans are made to whom at how much long-term gain to borrowers in terms of income advancement or wealth accumulation." Titled The Credit-Union Equality Commitment: An Analytical Assessment, the 38-page study notes that the credit-union industry was established in 1934 to provide households of "small means" with "provident or productive" financial services in exchange for a federal tax exemption and other benefits. Federal Financial Analytics managing partner Karen Petrou said in a June 25 press release that the goal of the study is "to remind policy-makers of their vital mission to ensure that taxpayer-benefits received are credit-union benefits earned." But, the study argues, "The 2019 credit-union regulatory regime has redesigned the credit-union business model into one often indistinguishable from expressly for-profit financial institutions with no comparable duties to serve low-and-moderate income households." The National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions pushed back on what it called the "banker report." In a June 26 press release NAFCU spokesperson Jacqueline Ramsay said "the paper offers scant evidence for the conclusions reached and makes no mention of banker efforts to prevent credit unions from serving underserved communities." The Credit Union National Association also dismissed the report. CUNA's chief advocacy officer Ryan Donovan was quoted in a published report stating, "As the saying goes, 'you get what you pay for' and the ABA appears to have gotten exactly what it was looking for: a well-funded, long-winded attack on a movement that for more than a century has provided value and benefit to consumers in ways big and small." Federal Financial Analytics describes itself as "a proprietary think tank providing analytical and advisory services on legislative, regulatory, and public-policy issues affecting global financial-services companies."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions