UK: Dual-Track Money Laundering Investigations: One-Way Traffic?

Last Updated: 16 May 2019
Article by Leila Gaafar

Speaking at the Global Investigations Review Live event in London on 4th April, Mark Steward, Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), addressed the audience on three subjects: partly-contested cases, recent case decisions, and AML investigations.

The final portion of Steward's speech on AML investigations was delivered "by request" as a somewhat reluctant coda: "I have been asked to say something about the Money-Laundering investigations given we are now conducting 'dual-track' AML investigations...that might give rise to either criminal or civil proceedings." In Steward's view, there should not be "anything controversial" about this subject. Yet from a practitioner's perspective, things are not quite so clear-cut, for two main reasons:

  1. dual-track criminal and civil AML investigations raise some practical issues that Steward does not acknowledge; and
  2. the FCA has indicated for several years that it intends to pursue more criminal cases for money laundering-related failings, an objective that Steward repeated in his speech. However, the FCA has not brought a single criminal prosecution under the current regulations, and only a handful under the preceding regulations. This begs two further questions: (1) is there any real utility to the FCA carrying out dual-track investigations, when the likelihood of a criminal prosecution seems so limited; and (2) ought the FCA to be pursuing these cases criminally at all?

Double trouble: the difficulties of pursuing a dual-track investigation

The logic for conducting dual-track processes from an investigator's point of view is reasonable. As Steward noted in his speech, "[i]t would be inconsistent with the investigative mindset to narrow the scope of potential outcomes provided for by the law before you have made any inquiries or been able to assess the nature of the matter under investigation." Committing at the outset to either a criminal or a civil process, when the law deliberately provides for both outcomes, would represent an unnecessary curtailment of the FCA's enforcement powers.

However, the dual-track method is not without serious disadvantages – for both the subject and the FCA. From the FCA's point of view, a dual-track investigation must be conducted from day one with an eye to a potential criminal prosecution, even if this never materialises. This means expending considerable time and resources recording and retaining information received during the course of the investigation in accordance with the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 ("CPIA"). Given that the parameters of alleged misconduct are unclear at the start of an investigation, this could prove particularly costly, and there is a risk that the FCA will receive large volumes of irrelevant information.

Perhaps the most uncomfortable demonstration of the difficulties dual track can present is dealing with interviews. An individual suspected of a criminal offence will ordinarily be interviewed under caution, in accordance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 ("PACE"). Interviews in connection with the investigation of regulatory offences, on the other hand, will typically be compelled, and statements made in these interviews will not be admissible in criminal proceedings. How, then, should the FCA deal with interviews in dual-track investigations, where the subject matter under investigation cannot neatly be separated into "exclusively civil" and "potentially criminal" misconduct? Should the FCA choose one interview format, and potentially limit the other arm of its investigation, or should it try to carry out parallel caution and compelled interviews? And in the latter case, how should subjects deal with a scenario where they may be interviewed under caution, and perfectly properly exercise their right to silence, only to be compelled to answer questions on overlapping subject matter? Many of these practical complexities are dealt with on an ad hoc, investigation-by-investigation basis. Notwithstanding Steward's somewhat offhand tone, further guidance and clarity on dealing with these situations could benefit investigation subjects.

Criminal prosecutions under the Money Laundering Regulations: the FCA's "white elephant"

The second "controversial" element of Steward's speech comes from his re-stated commitment to resolve more dual-track money laundering investigations criminally, rather than civilly: "...I think it is time that we gave effect to the full intention of the Money-Laundering Regulations which provides for criminal prosecutions...we need to enliven the jurisdiction if we want to ensure it is not a white elephant, and that is what we intend to do where we find strong evidence of egregiously poor systems and controls and what looks like actual money-laundering."

It is a familiar message. Back in 2017, the FCA's Business Plan made a similar commitment: money laundering failures by firms or individuals would "generally" be pursued by way of civil enforcement, but the FCA might deploy its criminal powers if failings were "particularly serious or repeated1". However, the statistics simply do not bear this out. According to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by Eversheds Sutherlands to the Home Office, there was not a single criminal prosecution under the current Money Laundering Regulations up to 30 September 20182. By contrast, several cases which, on any view, relate to "serious" and "repeated" money laundering failings were resolved civilly in the same time frame. Of course, this may be in part due to the relative infancy of the current regulations, which have only been in force since June 2017. However, criminal prosecutions under the preceding money laundering regulations were also exceptionally rare. The FCA's repeated threats to use its criminal powers for "particularly serious or repeated" money laundering failings therefore ring a little hollow.

This is not to say that money laundering offences are not criminally prosecuted: overlapping, criminal money laundering offences exist under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("POCA"). For those individual cases that, in the FCA's view, merit a criminal penalty, POCA offers a maximum sentence of 14 years' imprisonment, compared to just two years under the Money Laundering Regulations. However, a corporate criminal prosecution under this legislation would be virtually impossible, unless the offence could be proved against a senior "directing mind and will" of the company. By contrast, the Money Laundering Regulations are clearly designed to capture, with a potential criminal outcome, the kind of corporate money laundering failings – "egregiously poor systems and controls" as Steward put it - that the FCA is keen to pursue. It is surprising, then, that the FCA has not taken more opportunities to do so. Companies facing dual-track investigations may also have in mind the overwhelming statistical likelihood that the matter will be resolved civilly, and make their strategic decisions accordingly.

Steward's tacit acknowledgment that the FCA's criminal powers have been underused raises a further, interesting thought: ought the FCA to be pursuing systemic money laundering failings by way of a criminal action at all? The conclusion to his speech is illuminating in this regard. Citing Sir William Blackstone's 1765-1769 Commentaries on the Laws of England, Steward categorises money laundering failings as "...a breach and violation of public rights and duties which affect the whole community...distinguished by the harsher appellation of crimes and misdemeanors." In other words, he implies that money laundering failings of the kind envisaged by the regulations are sufficiently serious in nature that it is in some way morally incumbent upon the FCA to pursue them by way of a criminal, rather than a civil action. Perhaps Steward relies on this philosophical justification because, in reality, the practical justifications are somewhat limited: a criminal process is harder to run; harder to prove; more expensive; and, at least as far as corporates are concerned, the destination - a monetary penalty - is the same. So why not opt for a smoother ride?


1. FCA Business Plan 2017/2018 (, 18 April 2017, p. 40.

2. OIA Request referenced in article The UK's faltering fight to tackle AML compliance (Global Investigations Review, 16 April 2019).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions