UK: Liability Of Company Auditors

Last Updated: 23 April 2009
Article by Laurence Harris and Emma Richardson

The Court of Appeal's unanimous judgment in Moore Stephens (a firm) v Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation)1 is a welcome decision for auditors and their insurers. It confirms that an auditor is not liable for losses that arise from liabilities incurred by a company towards third parties caused by a company's fraud, where the fraud is perpetrated by the "sole directing mind" of the company.

The longstanding legal principle of ex turpi causa non oritur actio (the ex turpi principle), which means that "no court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action on an immoral or illegal act"2 , was the subject of much discussion in the Judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered on 18 June 2008, which overturned the High Court's decision. The case has received a great deal of publicity as it is one of the first substantial cases in England and Wales in which the Claimant, the liquidator, was financed by a third party funder.


Whilst Stone & Rolls Ltd (the Company) was in operation it was controlled and indirectly owned by Mr Zvonko Stojevic, a Croatian businessman. It was alleged that Mr Stojevic used the Company as a means to commit fraud against several banks. The fraud consisted of the presentation of false documents to the banks which allowed the Company to draw down on letters of credit. This enabled large sums of money to be directed through the Company and applied elsewhere for the benefit of Mr Stojevic (and others). The frauds gave rise to numerous liabilities by the Company to a number of banks, including a Czech bank, Komercni Banka AS (the Bank).

The Bank sued Mr Stojevic and the Company for this alleged deceit.3 Together, Mr Stojevic and the Company were found liable for the fraud and ordered to pay substantial damages to the Bank. Following the Judgment in that case, the Company could not pay the damages and went into provisional liquidation. The liquidators of the Company subsequently brought a claim against Moore Stephens (the Firm), its auditors. Their principal argument was that the Firm had negligently failed in the course of its audits to detect and report the fraudulent behaviour of Mr Stojevic. The Company's claim was for approximately US$174 million.

The Firm denied any breach of duty and issued an application for summary judgment on the claim or, alternatively, for the claim to be struck out. The Firm argued that the Company was essentially seeking to recover a loss caused by its own fraud and therefore the Company could not succeed because of the public policy argument expressed in the ex turpi principle. At first instance the High Court drew a distinction between the Company and Mr Stojevic in relation to the frauds committed and concluded that the Company was as much a victim. The Firm appealed.

The Issues

The Court of Appeal had two main issues to consider:

The Attribution Issue

The Company argued that the ex turpi principle did not prevent the Company from suing for recovery of its own losses caused by Mr Stojevic in relation to the frauds because the Company was itself a victim of the frauds and knowledge of the frauds should not therefore be attributed to the Company.

The "Very Thing" Argument

Secondly, the Company argued that the defence the Firm argued (the ex turpi principle) could not be relied upon to prevent the claim against it when the detection of dishonesty was the "very thing" that the Firm was retained to do.

Judgment of the Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the appeal and found against the Company on both issues.

The Court of Appeal rejected the argument that the Company was the victim of fraud and attributed Mr Stojevic's actions to the Company. The Court of Appeal believed that there was no prospect of the Company establishing at trial that it was the victim of the fraud. Lord Justice Rimer stated;

"Mr Stojevic was not engaged in a fraud on, or directed at, the company. He was using it as the vehicle for a fraud of its own directed at the banks. It was the company which tendered the fraudulent documents to the banks and it was the company that was dealing dishonestly with them."

The Company had sought to rely on the principle established in Re Hampshire Land Co4, which prevents fraud being attributed to a company in a situation where the fraudster has directed the fraud against the company itself. This argument was rejected by the Court of Appeal because the principle can only be relied upon when the company is itself a victim of the fraud being perpetrated.

The Court of Appeal held that the Company's claim was barred by the ex turpi principle. The Court unanimously agreed that there was no room for discretion in the application of the ex turpi principle, as recognised in Tinsley v Milligan:

"the principle is not a principle of justice; it is a principle of policy, whose application is indiscriminate and so can lead to unfair consequences as between the parties to litigation. Moreover the principle allows no room for the exercise of discretion by the court..."5

Finally, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Company's argument that the Firm should not have the benefit of the ex turpi principle because the "very thing" they were retained to do was to prevent the fraud as there was no authority to support it.


As it currently stands this decision is clearly supportive for auditors and their insurers, since it shows that companies involved in fraud may be prevented from pursuing recovery actions against auditors arising from such companies' own fraudulent actions. Nevertheless, its application will depend on the extent to which, in any given case, it is established that the individual responsible for the perpetrated fraud was the "sole directing mind and will" of that company. Indeed, it was the Company's principal argument that it was, for practical purposes, a "one man company". The reason why the Firm's defence succeeded was because the dishonesty of Mr Stojevic was attributed to the Company. The Company is reported to have appealed to the House of Lords.

Auditors and their insurers may also gain some reassurance from the recent changes to the Companies Act 2006 which means auditors are now allowed to cap their liability for statutory audits (although this is subject to approval of shareholders). Until 6 April 2008 such practices were prohibited.6

On a more general note, this case perhaps allays the fears of those who earlier raised general concerns about litigation funding, and its propensity to increase litigation and unmeritorious claims. Here, the claim funded by the unrelated third party funder, IM Litigation Funding, who raised money from hedge funds and other investors, failed. This may make third party funders more cautious about such claims going forward.


1 CA [2008] EWCA Civ 644.

2 Holman v Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp. 341, at 343.

3 Komercni Banka AS v Stone & Rolls Limited and Another [2002] EWHC 2263 (Comm).

4 [1986] 2 CH 743.

5 [1994] AC 340 at 355B.

6 See: Sections 523-538 Companies Act 2006.

This article first appeared in the Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge publication 'Commercial Litigation Review' in December 2008.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions