UK: Judging By Age And Putting Out Fires – Age Discrimination And Pensions In The Court Of Appeal

Age is one of the more recently added protected characteristics that is covered under the Equality Act 2010 ("Equality Act"). It became unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age in 2006. The emerging case law in this area continues to be of interest and develop what is and is not acceptable by the UK courts when it comes to practices that distinguish between individuals based on their age.

Just before Christmas last year, the Court of Appeal issued its potentially far-reaching decision in The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud and others. The Court held that transitional provisions introduced in line with changes being made to the judges' pension scheme and, separately, the firefighters' pension scheme, were discriminatory on the basis of age, and could not be objectively justified.

The decision serves as a stark warning that any compensatory or transitional protections offered to members in scheme change exercises need to be scrutinised carefully to ensure that they do not constitute unlawful age discrimination if they result in different treatment of members on the basis of their age.

Here our Combined Human Resources Solutions experts look at the decision in more detail, and the implications for employers and trustees who are looking to manage liabilities within their pension schemes.

What were the issues involved in the firefighters and pensions case?

This important decision looked at whether transitional protections offered to older judges and firefighters in their respective pension schemes to either fully or partially cushion them from wide-scale changes being made to future pension benefits were directly age discriminatory, on the basis that younger members of the respective pension scheme were offered no such protection.

Although these cases involved separate workforces (and schemes), because of the similarity of the issues involved, the issues were heard and considered together by the Court of Appeal.

What did the transitional provisions do?

Broadly, the transitional provisions in both cases gave some active members of the existing, more generous scheme full or partial protection under that scheme by reference to the member's age. The consequence of these transitional provisions was that:

  • older members who were closer to retirement had full protection in terms of their pension rights - i.e. they were allowed to remain in their current, more generous, pension arrangement;
  • members who were slightly younger had 'some protection'; and
  • members who were younger still, and who would reach normal retirement date after a certain cut-off were offered no protection at all.

Why were the transitional provisions introduced?

The intended aim behind such transitional provisions was a much stated Government desire to protect those closest to retirement from the effects of the pension reforms.

What was the basis of the younger members' claims?

Younger pension scheme members, who had either limited or no transitional protection, claimed that the protections constituted unlawful direct age discrimination on the basis they treated them less favourably and could not be justified.

The claimants also claimed that the provisions breached equal pay principles and constituted indirect race discrimination, arguing that the transitional provisions placed women and those of black and minority ethnic backgrounds judges and firefighters (who tended to be younger) at a particular disadvantage.

The financial impact of the different treatment for younger pension scheme members in both cases was significant. It was estimated that a firefighter who was too young to benefit from the transitional protection would need to make an investment of £16,000 - £19,000 a year to provide the same benefits as older members who had been given the protection.

For judges, because of a combination of the lack of transitional provisions for younger members, and the fact the new pension arrangement offered to them was on a different tax basis, the cost of providing the benefits they had lost out on was calculated to be at least £30,000 a year.

What did the Court decide?

The Court of Appeal held that the age discrimination claims of both the judges and the firefighters were made out. The employers had failed to show that their treatment of the claimants was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. It also dismissed the Employment Appeal Tribunal's order that the firefighters' decision should be remitted to the employment tribunal for a re-hearing on the issue of proportionality.

Given that the age discrimination claims were successful, the court held that the equal pay and indirect race discrimination claims were "of no real practical significance" but did state that the claims were made out in the judges' case and could also have been in the firefighters' case (subject to one issue which would have needed to be remitted if necessary).

If the transitional provisions distinguished between people on the basis of age, isn't that obviously discriminatory?

No.

Age discrimination is fairly unique in terms of the protections offered by the Equality Act, in that even direct age discrimination (i.e. less favourable treatment on the basis of age), is not necessarily unlawful if it can be objectively justified. To be able to demonstrate the measure was objectively justified, the employer in each case needed to satisfy the Court that:

  1. there was a legitimate aim; and
  2. the means used to achieve that aim were proportionate.

For direct discrimination, case law has established that the legitimate aim forming the basis of the objective justification must be consistent with the broad social and economic policy objectives of the government.

A key issue of law discussed was the margin of discretion to be applied by the courts - the Court of Appeal confirmed that it was for the court to afford the government some margin of discretion in relation to both the aims and means (being the two limbs of the objective justification test that needed to be satisfied), but it was then for the courts to determine what the appropriate margin should be in each case.

Here the Government had not provided sufficient evidence to support its rationale for the protective, transitional provisions. In the case of the judges, there was "just no evidence" that older judges did need more protection than younger judges. Similarly, in the case of firefighters, the Government's Counsel put forward claims that "it felt right" to protect older firefighters and the decision to do so "was a moral decision" were held by the court to be "not good enough".

Having failed at the first hurdle of the objective justification test, the Court only briefly looked at the issue of proportionality. In relation to judges, it commented that the addition to the reforms, which made younger judges worse off, the requirement for the younger judges to participate in an registered pension scheme (with disadvantageous tax consequences) was in itself a disproportionate means of achieving any legitimate intended aim.

So what does this mean?

It remains to be seen whether an appeal will be made to the Supreme Court by the Government in this case. However, if the Supreme Court provides the same answer as the Court of Appeal, or if no appeal is allowed, the costs of sorting this out will be significant: the Government will need to compensate younger members for the less favourable treatment they have received since the transitional provisions came into force, as well as working out how to revisit the pension scheme changes going forward so that the discriminatory elements are removed for all members. They will essentially have to revisit a liability management exercise that they had thought was done and dusted.

Comparable changes have been made to other public sector pension schemes over recent years, including tapering or transitional protections for the members of those schemes. Therefore, for public sector employers who introduced similar transitional protections in relation to their schemes, the implications of this decision could be significant, with the risk of their liability management exercises also being challenged.

Is the decision also important for private sector employers and trustees?

Yes. Whilst the marked distinction in treatment in this case did partially stem from it being a public sector pension scheme, any employer who is considering making changes to their pension provision should think carefully about any transitional protections or concessions they offer to employees to ease that change, particularly where those are only offered to people of a certain age or age group. Even seemingly neutral protections (i.e. to a particular membership group rather than age category) can have discriminatory outcomes if they favour employees of a particular age.

Trustees may also need to question the structure of liability management exercises presented to them by employees if they are of the view that it could lead to discriminatory treatment between scheme members. Any blanket reassurances by the scheme sponsor that provisions protect people of a particular age should be supported by evidence within the particular context of the workforce in question as a means of sharing the necessary objective justification to defeat any subsequent claims of age discrimination.

Find out more and sign up for our free All About Age webinar

Join our experts Ruth Ormston and Liz Wood for an 'All About Age' webinar on 26 February 2019.

Ruth and Liz will help you to identify the actions you need to take as an employer in light of recent case law decisions, consider issues to watch out for when pension scheme changes are made, provide top tips on getting it right when providing benefits and explain how to mitigate risk in this area for your business.

Read the original article on GowlingWLG.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions