UK: The New Electronic Communications Code – It's No Beauty Contest

Last Updated: 16 November 2018
Article by Jan Willem van den Bos, Bryan Johnston and Emma Broad

Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v. University of London is the first substantial case on the new Electronic Communications Code (Code), which came into force in December 2017. It considers the circumstances in which an operator can seek interim rights pursuant to paragraph 26 of the Code to go on to a site to undertake preliminary surveys and investigations to determine whether the site is a suitable location for electronic communications equipment. Unsurprisingly, given the policy objectives behind the Code, the decision is very much in favour of the operator. However, the decision will also be of interest to landowners as it provides guidance as to how parts of the Code should be interpreted, which in turn may help landowners with how they oppose or otherwise respond to requests for access.


Cornerstone is a joint venture company formed by mobile operators Telefonica UK Ltd (O2) and Vodafone Ltd. It is an operator but does not itself provide an electronic communications network. Instead, it installs and maintains apparatus which it makes available to its two shareholders. Having been forced to move equipment from one of its sites near Paddington Station, and relying on a temporary site to keep the local network going, Cornerstone approached the University of London requesting access to survey one of its halls of residence with a view to permanently locating its equipment on the roof. The request was not greeted with enthusiasm and, after a stand-off, Cornerstone applied to the Upper Tribunal (UT) for an order for interim Code rights.

To recap, under the new Code it is possible, subject to various conditions, for an operator to seek an order for interim Code rights. These are Code rights granted for a limited period of time which do not benefit from the statutory continuation provisions.

There were three issues before the UT:

Issue 1: Is a right of access to undertake a survey a Code right?

The UT helpfully clarified that paragraph 3 of the Code setting out the Code rights is a menu rather than a single right which must be acquired either in its entirety or not at all. So, when granting Code rights an agreement may impose some but not all of those rights.

The UT concluded that an agreement conferring the right to install equipment (paragraph 3(a) of the Code) necessarily entitles an operator to undertake preparatory steps required as a prelude to the installation itself. It also concluded that the right to do works in connection with the installation of equipment (paragraph 3(d) of the Code) was broad enough to encompass these preparatory works. By way of explanation, the UT stated: "'install' connotes a variety of tasks or works undertaken for the purpose of providing equipment on a site; 'works in connection with the installation' connotes a still wider range of activities." To construe the Code otherwise would create a possible ransom situation in which landowners could insist on, at the preliminary stage, a share in the economic value of the operator's network, something that is contrary to the principles on which the Code has been designed (the Code has been drafted on the basis that landowners will not share in the economic value of the network – this is encapsulated in the "no scheme" basis of valuation for consideration).

Issue 2: Is an operator entitled to request an interim right without also, at the same time, seeking a permanent right?

The University argued that an application for an order imposing interim rights must be "parasitic" on an application for an order seeking permanent rights.

The UT looked at the language of paragraph 23 of the Code and concluded there was no requirement for the operator to seek a permanent right at the same time as it sought an interim right.

Issue 3: Had the claim for interim rights been made out in the case?

One of the conditions that has to be satisfied before the UT can make an order for interim Code rights is that "the court thinks that there is a good arguable case that the test in paragraph 21 [of the Code] for the making of an order under paragraph 20 [of the Code] is met". To recap, that test is that: i) the prejudice caused to the relevant person (here the University) by the order is capable of being adequately compensated by money; and ii) the public benefit likely to result from the making of the order outweighs the prejudice to the relevant person and for this purpose the court must have regard to the public interest in access to a choice of high-quality electronic communications services. The question here was whether this test had been satisfied.

First the UT considered the standard that should apply when considering whether a claimant has made out the "good arguable case". It endorsed the view from Canada Trust v. Stolzenberg (No. 2) that this concept is not capable of precise definition, which reflects that the claimant must "properly satisfy the court that it is right for the court to take jurisdiction" and that it means "one side has a much better argument on the material". The expectation is that such applications will be dealt with on a summary basis – so without oral evidence or cross-examination and without full disclosure of documents. The onus is on the operator to provide sufficient information to demonstrate it has a good arguable case.

On the facts of this case the UT held that Cornerstone had demonstrated a good arguable case that the test set out in paragraph 21 of the Code (being the test prescribed by paragraph 20) had been satisfied. In coming to this decision it made the following observations, that will be of interest to others involved in Code disputes:

  • as part of its case the University actually quantified the costs it would incur for each site visit undertaken by Cornerstone. This inadvertently showed that the prejudice could be compensated in money;
  • while the onus of proof is on the operator to show that the prejudice can be compensated for by money, it is not required to speculate about any particular difficulty or inconvenience that will be caused to the site provider which the site provider has itself not chosen to identify. Nor is the operator required to adduce evidence concerning the amount of compensation or consideration that might be due; and
  • the focus of the second limb of the test (the public benefit likely to arise) does not require a comparison to be made between the public benefit that would arise from the use of the site in question and the public benefit that might arise from use of another site. "The choice of sites is left by the Code to the judgement of operators. It might possibly be argued that the availability of an alternative site was relevant to the exercise of the Tribunal's discretion ... but, generally, a comparison between sites is not required to demonstrate satisfaction of the second paragraph 21 condition."

In conclusion the UT held that "where, as in this case, the agreement sought is limited to a right of access on a few occasions during a limited period, the prejudice caused to the University is likely to be small and the public benefit required to overtop it need itself only be relatively modest".

Under the Code the UT has discretion, even if a good arguable case is established, not to grant the order. The University suggested that the conduct of Cornerstone and its lawyers was such that the UT should exercise its discretion not to grant an order. The UT rebutted this: while some of Cornerstone's correspondence had been unattractive (for example, describing the terms of the proposed agreement as "non-negotiable"), ultimately "this is not a beauty contest". Therefore such conduct was given little weight.

Accordingly, the UT made an order imposing an agreement for interim Code rights sufficient to enable Cornerstone to undertake the surveys and investigations required to establish whether the University's building was an appropriate site for Cornerstone's apparatus.


This case should be of interest to all landowners. It establishes that an operator is entitled to apply to the UT for an order granting it the right to go on to private property to undertake surveys and preliminary investigations to establish whether the site is a suitable location for electronic communications equipment. The legal threshold that operators have to meet appears to be relatively low and going forward it is going to be difficult for landowners to deny operators access for surveys and other preliminary matters.

Unfortunately, the case did not discuss the consideration that would be due to the University in relation to the interim rights. This area will be a key concern for landowners. It is likely that such figures will be low – the Code is predicated on the principle that operators should not be held to ransom by landowners and that landowners are not entitled to share in the economic value arising from the use of the site for electronic communications equipment.

The decision confirms that the priority under the Code is the provision of a choice of high-quality electronic communications services to the public rather than the interests of individual landowners.

At the time of writing it is not known whether the University is going to appeal, though it is likely that there will continue to be future challenges to the imposition of Code rights from landowners keen to preserve their property interests.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions