UK: Government Responds To Insolvency And Corporate Governance Consultations

Last Updated: 19 October 2018
Article by Neil Griffiths and Ian Fox

At the end of August, BEIS (finally) responded to a May 2016 consultation paper which reviewed the UK's corporate insolvency framework. It also took the opportunity to respond to wider insolvency and corporate governance issues which were the subject of a consultation in March 2018.

At the time of the first consultation, Dentons provided the government with its views on the proposed reforms, many of which have been taken on board in the recent government response. (For our previous articles click here.)

In this article, we review the reform proposals to the corporate insolvency framework as they now stand, compared to what was proposed in the original consultation.

A new pre-insolvency moratorium

Sticking with the plan: The government remains committed to the idea of a new moratorium available to all companies against creditor action while a company is given breathing space to consider its rescue options. This idea was largely favoured by respondents to the 2016 consultation, including Dentons. Thankfully, and as supported by Dentons, the moratorium will not be a compulsory gateway before starting an administration (or other rescue procedure). Nor will it be a bar to companies negotiating informal contractual standstill arrangements with creditors without the use of a statutory moratorium.

How long? The moratorium can last "up to" three months, but will have an initial 28-day period, which may be extended. The government has taken on board respondents' comments that a blanket three-month period seemed too long for all situations. If the company has proposed a scheme or CVA (for example) during the moratorium, but the moratorium "runs out" before the outcome has been determined e.g. because the relevant meetings have not yet taken place, the moratorium will automatically extend until the point where creditors approve or reject the proposals. The moratorium's time period is also intended to be stand alone. If the company enters into administration after using a moratorium, the administration period will be unaffected by this previous moratorium and will still run for 12 months which is a welcome clarification.

How to apply? The government intends to model the new moratorium on the existing administration moratorium and have it triggered by filing similar papers at court as with the current out of court administration appointment regime. This is a sensible solution rather than requiring formal court sanction at a hearing. The existing "small companies moratorium" available to eligible companies proposing a CVA will be repealed and replaced with this new moratorium so that anyone considering a CVA will be able to take advantage of an initial moratorium should they so wish. The test for eligibility of the moratorium is proposed to be one of prospective (not actual) insolvency, based upon a requirement that the company will become insolvent if action is not taken. The test will be judged on the balance of probabilities i.e. that a rescue is more likely than not. The monitor, as an insolvency professional, and not the directors, would be responsible for ensuring the company meets this test. Certain companies will be excluded from the moratorium, but previous recent insolvency it seems will not be a bar. Unlike in current administrations, the monitor will not be able to consent to actions that contravene the moratorium, such as taking legal proceedings.

Who will be in charge during the moratorium? Directors will remain in control of the company and the new "monitor's" role will be limited and will cover assessing and continuing to review the eligibility requirements and sanctioning asset disposals (which are outside the ordinary course of business) during the moratorium period. The government has kept the provisions prohibiting individual monitors (but not other members of their firms) from accepting a subsequent appointment with a company as a liquidator or administrator for 12 months. However, they can still accept appointments as a CVA supervisor. It is likely that this watered down version of the prohibition, which favours large firms, is a reaction to the mixed response the government received to the idea.

Preserving essential contracts for businesses in financial difficulty

A revised approach: The government remains committed to ensuring preservation of "essential supply contracts" during a moratorium period to enable businesses to continue trading in a restructuring. In its response the government sets out a proposal which will prohibit suppliers of goods and services from relying on termination clauses that allow a contract to be terminated on the grounds of formal insolvency (so called "ipso facto" clauses but not other clauses, such as non-payment of liabilities due under the contract, or termination following expiry of the specified contractual notice period). Contractual licences will be covered under these general preservation rules, such as for software or patents. Licences issued by public authorities will be excluded. If a supplier is likely to face "undue financial hardship" as a result of a prohibition, they can apply to court to be able to seek permission to terminate the supplies.

At the time, Dentons raised some concerns about this idea in general, uncertain that a rigid "designation" of contracts as essential would even be possible, not least undesirable. Whilst some respondents thought the proposals would result in a higher number of business rescues, this view was not shared by us. As a result the government no longer intends to require the designation of essential suppliers by a debtor company. It also intends to exempt certain types of financial products and services from the provisions. There is, however, still a long way to go before all the issues surrounding this proposal are ironed out.

A new "flexible restructuring plan"

New wine in old bottles? The government is still committed to introducing a new restructuring procedure that binds both secured and unsecured creditors and introduces a "cram-down" allowing majority creditors to bind the minority, having received positive feedback on such a proposal from the majority of respondents, including Dentons, who welcomed the idea of a stand-alone procedure as an alternative to, but not a replacement for, CVAs and schemes of arrangement. The plan is likely to be modelled on the existing schemes model, but with class and sanction court hearings as part of the process. Those proposing a plan will be able to take advantage of the protection of the new
stand-alone moratorium (which is currently within the purview of the court in the current scheme of arrangement).

Who, how and how long? The new plan will not be available to all companies, with similar financial market entities excluded, as per the current small companies moratorium for CVAs. However, no financial conditions will be set to qualify, so both solvent and insolvent entities will be able to benefit from such a plan, including those already in an insolvency procedure acting via their existing insolvency office holder. Companies proposing a plan would act via their directors (rather than a mandatory appointed supervisor). The parties to the plan would decide who, if anyone, would be needed to oversee its implementation.

Rather than imposing a fixed 12-month period for the plan, the government now states it will be for the parties to decide the time period.

US-style cram down: Dentons has always welcomed the idea of making a new restructuring plan universally binding in the face of dissention from some creditors, subject to there being suitable protection for creditors. In particular, we support the purpose of preventing creditors who are "out of the money" from deriving value from ransom situations, unless this is justified for commercial reasons (such as the need to continue trading with essential suppliers). The government agrees with this.

However, the government may have missed a trick here with the voting requirements suggested, namely to make these plans easier to implement than schemes and therefore increase their popularity.

The issue of how claims should be valued in a plan where dissenting creditors are being crammed down was, as predicted, a contentious topic amongst consultation respondents. Rather than using the minimum liquidation alternative value (which Dentons pointed out has not always been the correct comparator in a scheme scenario) the government is proposing to use a "next best alternative" test.

Legislating for rescue finance? Finally, the government has decided not to pursue proposed changes formalising the rescue finance market.

Exciting times? To implement these changes will represent the single biggest change to the corporate insolvency regime since 2002. It will require amendment to primary legislation. It is difficult, however, to get too excited about them. Whilst (especially post Brexit) anything that makes us more attractive as a restructuring jurisdiction within Europe is to be applauded, we do not envisage these changes will be brought in any time soon. If we look to the US for inspiration, how these principles will fit within the existing UK insolvency framework remains to be seen. The devil, as always, will be in the detail. It is also not certain that they are necessary. The UK already has, in our view, the benefit of a flexible and efficient set of procedures backed up by reasoned case law and practice. Will this overcomplicate the legislation to the detriment of the industry? There is a danger it might!

Not finished there!

The government has also committed to:

  • applying inflation to the current figure for the Prescribed Part pot of assets available to unsecured creditors in an insolvency process, which will now increase to £800,000;
  • bringing in legislation to ensure directors of holding companies must have regard to the interests of a subsidiary company's stakeholders when selling that subsidiary. Directors of a holding company could be subject to disqualification proceedings if they allow the sale of a subsidiary (that then goes into liquidation within 12 months) if they had no reasonable belief that the sale would likely deliver a no worse outcome for the stakeholders of the subsidiary than placing it into formal insolvency;
  • issue further consultation with a view to amending the current legislation relating to preferences to connected parties and extortionate credit transactions; and
  • introduce new directors disqualification legislation to include former directors of dissolved companies within its ambit.

The government is also considering:

  • introducing a requirement for companies of a "significant size" to provide an organogram of their corporate structure and explain how corporate governance is maintained throughout the group;
  • consulting with the FRC on the Stewardship Code to consider how investment mandates given to firms can include reference to stewardship;
  • consulting with legal and accounting bodies to consider whether there should be an overall review of the dividend framework. For example, including a requirement that shareholders should be able to vote on at least one set of annual dividends; and
  • bringing forward proposals to increase the level of training available to directors.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
11 Dec 2018, Seminar, London, UK

We are delighted to invite you to our breakfast seminar and Q&A forum on the people aspects of Brexit.

11 Dec 2018, Seminar, An Nijmegen, Netherlands

We are delighted to invite you to our breakfast seminar and Q&A forum on the people aspects of Brexit.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions