UK: ENRC Privilege Decision: Welcome News But Difficulties Remain

Last Updated: 5 October 2018
Article by Julian Copeman, Anna Pertoldi and Maura McIntosh

A recent Court of Appeal decision has restored the orthodox position on litigation privilege, but has left the battle to be fought another day for a more workable approach to legal advice privilege (The Director of the Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2006).

In relation to litigation privilege, the court disagreed with the High Court's overly strict approach to whether litigation was in reasonable contemplation when the company undertook an internal investigation into alleged wrongdoing, and whether documents forming part of that investigation were for the dominant purpose of the litigation ([2017] EWHC 1017; see News brief "Investigations and privilege: a restrictive scope", www. practicallaw.com/w-008-3720). The decision is particularly helpful in dispelling the troubling suggestion at first instance that litigation privilege did not apply to documents aimed at preventing or settling litigation, as opposed to defending it.

In relation to legal advice privilege, however, the court considered itself bound by the notorious Three Rivers District Council and others v The Governor and Company of the Bank of England (Three Rivers No 5) decision to find that the privilege is limited to communications between a lawyer and those tasked with seeking and receiving advice on behalf of the client company, rather than all employees ([2003] EWCA Civ 474). As such, any extension will have to be a matter for the Supreme Court.

SFO v ENRC

As part of its criminal investigation into the activities of Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd (ENRC), the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) issued notices under section 2(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 against various parties, including ENRC, to compel the production of certain categories of documents. These included notes taken by ENRC's former lawyers of interviews with its employees and former employees as part of an internal investigation which was prompted by a whistleblower's allegations.

The claims to privilege were rejected at first instance, with the High Court taking a very narrow approach to both litigation privilege and legal advice privilege. ENRC appealed.

Contemplating litigation

The court held that the High Court was wrong to conclude that a criminal prosecution was not reasonably in prospect at the relevant time. In the court's view, the possibility of prosecution, if the self-reporting process did not result in a settlement, formed the whole sub-text of the relationship between ENRC and the SFO. Where the SFO specifically made clear to ENRC the prospect of a criminal prosecution, and legal advisers were engaged to deal with that situation, there was a clear ground for contending that litigation was in reasonable contemplation.

The decision is helpful in confirming that litigation may be in contemplation even if a party needs to make further investigations before it can say with certainty that proceedings are likely. This is consistent with previous authority, which makes it clear that the question of whether litigation is in reasonable prospect is not a question to be determined on the balance of probabilities. It is a matter of fact and degree.

Dominant purpose

The court also held that the High Court was wrong to conclude that, if litigation was in contemplation, the documents were not prepared for the dominant purpose of that litigation. The court helpfully clarified three issues of principle, on which the High Court had made errors:

  • It confirmed that, contrary to the High Court's view, documents prepared for the purpose of taking legal advice on how to avoid or settle proceedings are as much protected by litigation privilege as those prepared to take advice for the purpose of defending proceedings.
  • It confirmed that investigating the facts may be a subset of the overarching purpose of advising on contemplated legal proceedings, rather than a separate competing purpose. The court commented that, while a reputable company will wish to ensure high ethical standards for its own sake, where there is a clear threat of a criminal investigation, the dominant purpose for investigating whistleblower allegations is likely to be preventing or dealing with litigation.
  • It dismissed the idea that, where a document is created with the intention of showing it to the opposing party, that means it cannot be subject to litigation privilege. It is, of course, often the case that draft documents, such as witness statements, are covered by litigation privilege even though the final version will be served on the opponent.

The "client" problem lives on

The court did not need to decide whether the communications in question were covered by legal advice privilege, given its conclusions in relation to litigation privilege, but nonetheless indicated how it would have decided the issue.

It agreed with the High Court that Three Rivers No 5 is binding authority that legal advice privilege cannot apply to communications between a company's legal adviser and its employee unless that employee was tasked with seeking and receiving legal advice on behalf of the client. Authority to provide information to the lawyers in order to enable them to advise is not sufficient to render the employee part of the client for the purpose of legal advice privilege.

An unequal application of privilege

The court said that, if it had been free to depart from the Three Rivers No 5 approach, it would have done so based on a principled analysis of the purpose of legal advice privilege. That is to enable clients to place the full facts before their lawyers in order to obtain legal advice on their affairs, without fear that what they tell their lawyers will be disclosed without their consent.

In the court's view, the rule should apply equally to all. However, the current approach is unfair to large companies, as in that context it is much less likely that the information the lawyers need will be in the hands of those appointed to seek and obtain legal advice on the company's behalf. It also means that English law is out of step with other common law jurisdictions on this issue, which the court described as undesirable.

Off to the Supreme Court?

The court said that the question of whether Three Rivers No 5 was wrong in its approach to legal advice privilege could only be determined by the Supreme Court. However, unless the SFO seeks and obtains permission to appeal on the question of litigation privilege, which seems unlikely as the court's decision on that aspect seems entirely orthodox, a reconsideration of legal advice privilege will have to wait for another case.

When the matter does come before the Supreme Court, as seems inevitable, the court's comments in this case will no doubt be of great interest. In that regard, it is worth noting that the court did not appear to favour the dominant purpose test for legal advice privilege which has been adopted in place of Three Rivers No 5 in Australia and Hong Kong. Although it did not express any final conclusion on the point, it did not see why there should be an additional test of dominant purpose, given that legal advice privilege can only be claimed where legal advice is being sought or given. Nor was it persuaded that former employees should be treated any differently from other third parties, whose communications are not covered by legal advice privilege. However, it said that was an issue that could be considered if, and when, the Supreme Court had cause to decide a challenge to Three Rivers No 5.

Previously published in October 2018 issue of PLC Magazine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions