UK: Another Upside To Costs Budgeting? Orders For Interim Payments On Account Of Costs

Last Updated: 23 September 2018
Article by Clare Dixon

Clare Dixon of 4 New Square looks at the impact which costs budgeting has had on interim payments on account of costs and explains why, when an indemnity costs order is made, the budget won't necessarily be a ceiling to recovery.

Victory having been secured in litigation, attention often then turns to costs. First on the agenda is securing a favourable costs order but, having achieved that, the receiving party wants to know how much they are going to recover, and when.

CPR 44.2(8) states: "Where the court orders a party to pay costs subject to detailed assessment, it will order that party to pay a reasonable sum on account of costs, unless there is a good reason not to do so". Obtaining such an order has several benefits:

  1. Unless the Court orders otherwise, payment should be made within 14 days and, in default of payment, enforcement action can be taken;
  2. If payment is not forthcoming and/or enforcement proceedings reveal there to be little or nothing to enforce against, then the successful party can take an informed decision about whether pursuing a detailed assessment is worthwhile; and
  3. If a high enough percentage is secured then, even if the paying party has the means to pay, the successful litigant may take the view that the prospects of recovering the remaining sum do not justify the expense of such action.

Before costs budgeting, and perhaps because of a previously more restrictive wording of the relevant rule, the percentages ordered by way of interim payments were (according to Birss J. in Thomas Pink Ltd v Victoria's Secret UK Limited [2015] 3 Costs LR 463) generally a little over 50% of the incurred costs. However, following the introduction of costs budgeting, CPR 3.18 was introduced which provides: "In any case where a costs management order has been made, when assessing costs on the standard basis, the court will... (b) not depart from such approved or agreed budgeted costs unless satisfied that there is a good reason to do so". Two consequences of this are the focus of this note. First, the impact which costs budgeting has had on the proportion of costs which Judges are prepared to award when making interim costs orders and, second, the relevance of costs budgets to interim costs orders where the paying party is ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis.

In Elvanite Full Circle Ltd v AMEC Earth & Environment (UK) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1643 the successful defendant's approved costs were about half their actual costs. Coulson J. (as he then was) considered the ambit of CPR 3.18 and made, amongst others, the following findings.

  • First, he found (albeit obiter) that where an indemnity costs order was made the starting point for determining the level of an interim payment on account of those costs should be the budgeted costs. He found this, notwithstanding CPR 3.18's reference to assessment on a standard basis, but acknowledged that in such circumstances there may be "good reasons" to depart from the budgeted costs.
  • Second, having found that the defendant could neither amend its budget nor evince a good reason to depart from it, the Judge ordered an interim payment of £250,000. This was about 94% of the defendant's budgeted costs (but only about 50% of their actual costs) and consequently a lesson both in the need to accurately budget and in the benefits to be gained where there is accurate budgeting.

In Kellie v Wheatley & Lloyd Architects [2014] 5 Costs LR 854 His Honour Judge Keyser QC ordered an interim payment of £90,000 against a costs budget of £91,700 (ie 98%). He also (again obiter) disagreed with Coulson J. on whether the starting point for assessing the level of an interim payment, where there was an order for indemnity costs, should be the budgeted figure for two reasons. First, because CPR 3.18 makes express reference to assessing costs on the standard basis. Second, because the budgeting process involves (amongst other things) assessing the proportionality of costs whereas indemnity costs are not subject to a test of proportionality, but merely of reasonableness.

The existence of the conflicting decisions in Elvanite and Kellie was acknowledged by HHJ Simon Brown QC in Excelerate Technology v Cumberbatch [2015] 2 Costs LO 223 who appears to have tried to reconcile the decisions saying: "Where, as here, the claimant's costs will be assessed on an indemnity basis, the claimant will not be so limited by the rules to the agreed costs budget but it may, in practical terms, be a starting point or guide for the costs judge on any detailed assessment". However, whilst the point was raised in Excelerate, it did not arise in practice since the actual costs did not exceed the budgeted figure. It therefore remains a point for future argument.

In terms of what constitutes a "reasonable sum" 90% was ordered in both Thomas Pink and MacInnes v Gross [2017] 4 WLR 49 with Coulson J. saying in the latter that he considered this to be "the maximum deduction that it is appropriate to make in a case where there is an approved costs budget".

Finally, in Cleveland Bridge v Sarens (UK) Ltd [2018] 2 Costs LR 333, the paying party opposed a payment on account of 90% on the basis that (i) part of the budgeted costs were incurred costs and (ii) there was likely to be a reduction in hourly rate on assessment. Both points had force given that CPR 3EPD provides that approval of hourly rates and incurred costs is not part of the budgeting process. In respect of issue (i) the Judge made an interim order of 70% in relation to incurred costs (finding that MacInnes was not intended to apply to such costs) and 90% in relation to budgeted costs and on issue (ii) she found that any issue as to hourly rates could be accounted for in the 10% differential between the budgeted costs and the interim order awarded.

From a practical point of view the importance of budgeting accurately and making timely revisions cannot be overestimated. Further, as Coulson J. pointed out in MacInnes, one of the main benefits to be gained from the additional work necessitated by costs budgeting is the additional certainty provided about what the likely costs recovery will be. When coupled with an interim order on account of costs it means that a successful party can have greater certainty not only about how much it is likely to recover but that it is likely to be able to enforce an order for a high proportion of that sum soon after receiving judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
4 New Square Chambers
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
4 New Square Chambers
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions