UK: How Taxpayers Are Taking To Tax Reform So Far

Less than a year after the most significant U.S. tax reform legislation since 1986 was signed into law, it is still too early to predict the long-term effects. A number of technical uncertainties remain and taxpayers are continuing to evaluate how best to respond to even those portions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that are relatively well-understood. Many appear wary that a future administration could do away with the act's low tax rates and other incentives.

While the effects of the act on taxpayer behavior have not been as drastic as some expected, taxpayers have begun to adjust and will continue to do so as guidance is released on some of the more uncertain provisions. A number of significant trends have begun to emerge, including those outlined below.

Increase in Use of Corporations

As a result of the act's significant reduction in the corporate tax rate — from 35 percent to 21 percent — many taxpayers that previously would have chosen without hesitation to hold their businesses in pass-through form are now considering incorporating them. Under the act, most individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers are generally subject to an effective overall tax rate of 36.8 percent on income earned through a corporation, consisting of (1) at the corporate level, the new 21 percent corporate rate plus (2) at the shareholder level, the favorable 20 percent "qualified dividend" rate on dividends of the corporation's net — i.e., after-tax — earnings, if and when they are distributed. This is lower than the act's maximum 37 percent individual rate on ordinary income, not to mention that the shareholder-level tax can usually be deferred if the corporation retains its earnings rather than distributing them as dividends. Moreover, the act permits corporations — but generally not individuals — to continue to deduct state and local income taxes.

As a result, the prospect of the "double taxation" that results from holding a business in corporate form is no longer as daunting as it once was. Additionally, the simplified reporting available to corporate shareholders — who receive 1099 tax forms showing dividend income rather than complicated K-1s reporting pass-through business income — can expand the universe of investors that are willing and able to hold the entity's interests. Foreign and tax-exempt investors, in particular, generally have an easier time holding corporate stock than partnership interests.

So far, however, most taxpayers have been reluctant to pull the trigger on the corporate holding company structure. For many, the pass-through form remains the more taxefficient option — at least through 2025 — as a result of the new 20 percent deduction for most types of pass-through business income earned by noncorporate taxpayers. Others are wary of the potential for the corporate rate to increase once again under a future administration and the difficulty of responding to such an increase, given the general inability to leave corporate solution on a tax-free basis once it has been entered. Still, a few businesses have decided to take the leap. Perhaps the most notable examples are KKR & Co. LP and Ares Management LP, two publicly traded investment management firms that have decided to convert from partnership to corporate status. The conversions are expected to allow the firms to attract new investors that were previously unwilling to buy partnership interests, thereby increasing their stock price. We expect public and private taxpayers alike to continue to evaluate closely the opportunities to incorporate.

Effects on Capital Structure

Taxpayers are rethinking their capital structures. Prior to the act, they generally had an incentive to capitalize themselves with a significant amount of debt — both third-party borrowings and, in the case of businesses held in corporate form, shareholder debt. But the act contains a number of provisions that limit the benefits of leverage, leading many taxpayers to focus more heavily on equity capitalization.

For example, new Internal Revenue Code Section 163(j) imposes significant limitations on the deductibility of interest expense. Partnerships, especially, need to closely analyze this provision, which contains a set of complex and potentially burdensome partnership-specific rules. Some partnerships that are within the scope of Code Section 163(j) have found that preferred equity is a better method of capitalization, as coupon payments on a partnership preferred equity instrument are not limited by the rules and have a similar tax profile to interest deductions.

Similarly, the reduction in the corporate tax rate has made interest deductions less valuable than prior to the act, a consideration especially relevant in the case of shareholder debt. Foreign investors, for example, commonly invest in U.S. businesses through leveraged corporate "blockers." Prior to the act, this could be efficient even if the investor was not subject to a reduced rate of withholding on interest payments under a treaty or other exemption: The 35 percent benefit of a corporate-level interest deduction was worth the cost of a 30 percent withholding tax at the shareholder level. But in light of the new 21 percent corporate rate under the act, many foreign investors that are not eligible to reduce the 30 percent withholding rate by treaty (or otherwise) have limited or forgone the use of shareholder debt in favor of — or have recapitalized existing shareholder debt into — equity. Although dividends on equity are generally subject to the same 30 percent withholding tax as interest on debt — only without the benefit of an interest deduction — equity capitalization provides more flexibility to retain earnings in advance of a potentially tax-efficient exit.

In many cases, shareholder or third-party debt leverage will continue to make sense. But we expect investors to continue to scrutinize their capital structures and, in appropriate circumstances, choose a more equity-focused structure than would have been optimal under prior law.

Effects on Deal Structure

A key tax question in any M&A transaction is whether the buyer will purchase stock or assets. Buyers typically prefer asset sales in order to obtain a basis step-up, whereas sellers often prefer stock sales so that they do not have to bear the two layers of tax that an asset sale generally triggers.

The act has eased this inherent tension between the interests of buyers and sellers in two ways. First, it has decreased the costs of an asset sale to the seller via the reduction in the corporate rate. Second, it has increased the benefits of an asset sale to the buyer by significantly expanding the ability of the buyer to deduct immediately its costs of acquiring the assets under the bonus depreciation rules. Although it is still too soon to precisely measure the act's effect on the frequency of asset sale transactions, asset sale transactions are likely to be more viable than prior to the act.

Access to Offshore Trapped Cash

The act included a mandatory one-time tax imposed on the previously untaxed earnings that U.S. corporations and certain other U.S. taxpayers had accumulated through their foreign subsidiaries since 1986. Because those earnings have been taxed, taxpayers are now free to repatriate them to the United States without incremental liability. To date, most corporations appear to be using the bulk of their repatriated earnings to fund debt service and dividend payments and stock repurchases at record levels. Anecdotally, access to previously "trapped" cash also appears to have facilitated M&A activity, particularly in the United States, since multinationals now have ready access to cash that previously could only be accessed easily for foreign acquisitions.

Impact on US Investment and Jobs

Since enactment, several large companies have announced plans for future investment in new U.S.-based facilities with associated jobs targets. In addition, the act appears to be incentivizing corporations to increase capital expenditures, likely as a result of the savings from the lower corporate tax rate and the increased ability to immediately deduct capital expenditures under the revised bonus depreciation rules.

Even so, the United States has not yet seen a significant uptick in U.S.-based manufacturing and other jobs, notwithstanding the lower general corporate rate and the other incentives in the act to create jobs — such as the favorable tax rate applicable to foreign derived intangible income, or FDII, which acts as an export subsidy. It is likely too soon to evaluate accurately the job-creating effects of the act, given the time and expense it takes to bring jobs back onshore or create new ones. Nonetheless, multinationals need a degree of certainty that the new U.S. tax system will be permanent before embarking on that kind of large-scale undertaking. Taxpayers continue to be concerned that a change in administration could result in the elimination of certain favorable benefits under the act and an increase in tax rates going forward, particularly if deficit pressures mount. In addition, although the U.S. federal corporate tax rate is now a competitive 21 percent, state and local tax rates have not decreased, meaning that the U.S. may continue to be perceived as a relatively high tax jurisdiction in which to operate, at least compared to certain jurisdictions like Ireland or the U.K. Consequently, many multinationals appear to be taking a wait-and-see approach while they evaluate what activities could be moved or developed onshore.

Uncertainty in Application

The U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have made significant strides in attempting to put forth timely and helpful interpretive guidance on a myriad of cross-border and other issues arising under the act. To date, most of that guidance has centered around the transition tax, as most taxpayers were required to make a down payment toward the tax in April 2018. Treasury and IRS officials have recently discussed several regulation projects regarding the global intangible low-taxed income, or GILTI, regime, the FDII regime, the base erosion anti-avoidance tax and a number of the domestic provisions of the act, with an ambitious target of proposing regulations on a staggered basis on all of these issues throughout the summer and fall, and in any event by November 2018.

Multinationals are particularly concerned that the GILTI tax — which was understood to operate as a minimum tax on offshore low-taxed income — may not work the way it was described. Under the GILTI regime, Congress anticipated that if a foreign subsidiary was subject to local country tax at a rate less than 13 1/8 percent, a 10.5 percent rate of U.S. tax would apply on the difference and that no residual U.S. tax would apply if local country taxes are in excess of 13 1/8 percent. But in light of the complexities associated with overlaying the United States' existing foreign tax credit system onto the GILTI regime, taxpayers and the tax administration are finding that the rules do not work this way. U.S. multinationals with operations in non-U.S. jurisdictions with tax rates near or above 13 1/8 percent are fearful that they will be unable to credit local country taxes in full against their GILTI tax liability, resulting in current tax rates on those earnings that are higher than they were under prior law after taking into account the previous ability to defer U.S. tax on those earnings. In fact, the GILTI regime appears to create a perverse incentive for some multinationals to move certain offshore supply chain activities to countries that impose little or no income taxes in order to ensure that a top tax rate of 10.5 percent will apply to those activities.

Although Treasury and the IRS have been discussing this issue with many taxpayers and seem open to addressing taxpayer concerns, they may not be inclined or able to alleviate the problem in its entirety. In the meantime, taxpayers anxiously await guidance on this important topic.

To Invert or Not to Invert

The act does not appear to have incentivized non-U.S. corporations that previously engaged in inversion transactions to engage in so-called "reversions" — transactions intended to bring the tax residence of the group back into the United States — in order to take full advantage of the new U.S. regime. While there are several reasons for this, the impact of the GILTI tax, coupled with the concern that the low rates and incentives under the act may not be permanent, may be the primary causes.

Conversely, although the act contained several provisions intended to punish companies that inverted after enactment, there remains a sweet spot where a U.S. corporation can combine with a strategic merger partner under a non-U.S. parent company in a transaction that is not viewed as an inversion — where ownership by former U.S. shareholders of the U.S. company is between 50 percent and 60 percent of the combined entity — in order to ensure that the non-U.S. operations of that merger partner do not come within the U.S. tax net. Consequently, as was true prior to the act, the United Kingdom, Ireland and other jurisdictions still appear to have a tax advantage over the United States in these situations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions