ARTICLE
1 August 2018

EU Proposes Amendments To MiFID II's Tick Size Regime

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
The result may be less liquidity on EU trading markets.
European Union Finance and Banking

On 13 July, 2018, ESMA launched a consultation on proposed amendments to the RTS (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/588, also known as RTS 11) providing for the tick size regime under MiFID II. The tick size regime subjects orders in shares and depositary receipts to minimum tick sizes that are determined according to both the: (i) average daily number of transactions on the most relevant market in terms of liquidity; and (ii) price of the order. RTS 11 calibrates the minimum tick size based on the most liquid market in the EU, without any consideration being given to the liquidity on non-EU trading venues. The result is that EU trading venues have experienced a drop in market share in third-country financial instruments since January 3, 2018 when MiFID II came into effect. The trading venues have highlighted that the decrease in market share is because the RTS 11 methodology requires them to have in place larger price increments than those of their third-country competitor trading venues.

ESMA is proposing to change the calibration of the tick sizes for third-country instruments where the most liquid trading venue is located outside the EU to address the concern that the minimum tick size is based on "underestimated" liquidity for financial instruments where only a marginal proportion of trading is executed on EU trading venues. ESMA's belief is that the existing situation has the potential to create a competitive disadvantage for EU trading venues, because non-EU trading venues can offer tighter spreads since they are likely to be subject to a narrower tick size regime or none at all. The result may be less liquidity on EU trading markets.

ESMA proposes that national regulators of EU trading venues trading a third-country instrument be allowed to coordinate and to agree on an adjusted average daily number of transactions that reflects the liquidity available on third-country venues on a case-by-case basis. This proposed exception to the general tick size regime would only be applicable to shares that meet certain conditions. Depository receipts will be out of scope of the exception.

Feedback on the proposals is requested by September 7, 2018. ESMA will consider the feedback in formulating the final draft amending RTS it submits to the European Commission for endorsement.

ESMA's consultation is available at: https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-consults-tick-size-regime.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More