European Union: The Impact Of The European Commission´s Proposals For A New Prudential Capital Framework On MiFID Investment Firms

Last Updated: 25 July 2018
Article by Michael Huertas, Katja Michel and Markus Schrader

How does the Commission's proposed legislative package impact investment managers in the EU-27 and what pre-emptive steps can stakeholders take to stay ahead of the curve?

In December 2017, the European Commission (the Commission) issued the legislative proposals for prudential requirements for investment firms: the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and the Investment Firms Directive (IFD). The aim of the proposals is to create a new simpler and more risk-sensitive prudential capital regime for MiFID investment firms built around quantitative metrics, called K-Factors, that define regulatory capital levels.

It is anticipated that the proposed package comes into force in mid to late 2019 at the earliest. However, the shift in prudential requirements may merit many needing to take early pre-emptive action to either source new regulatory capital or to put in place arrangements to limit risks that could flow into the K-Factors, which might lead to looking at rearranging regulated activities and who does what where.

This Client Alert highlights the Commission´s December 2017 legislative proposals to establish a more tiered and proportionate1 prudential capital regime for certain "Investment Firms" as such term is used in the context of the CRR/CRD IV Framework and ultimately the MiFID II/MiFIR Framework that entered into force on 3 January 2018. With supervisory policymakers having intimated during the spring of 2018 that the K-Factors are an important future supervisory tool, this is a development that affected firms ought to watch let alone take preparatory action to be ready to seize opportunities.

In summary, the proposed legislation aims to create a more risk-focused regime that is tailored and reflective of the activities of an Investment Firm rather than to continue to treat all Investment Firms in an identical fashion. Two core changes to how prudential requirements apply to Investment Firms are at the heart of the proposal:

  1. Creation of classes of Investment Firms. These can be distinguished between those that are:

    1. Class 1 = systemic firms that undertake bank like activity and which will be reclassified as credit institutions and continue to be subject to the full CRD IV/CRR Framework. The IFR/IFD regime will not apply to them;
    2. Class 2 = other non-systemic Investment Firms whose activity places these above quantitative thresholds that are used to categorise Class 3 entities;
    3. Class 3 = smaller and non-interconnected entities to which a simplified version of the regime applies;
  2. Setting of capital requirements in a manner that is more proportionate to the risks specific to the Class of Investment Firms. This is done using specific methodology in each of the "K-Factors", which are described in the table below. In practice, this may translate into many firms needing to raise capital to meet such new relevant regulatory capital requirements or cause many to reconsider how and into which Class of Firm their activities cause them to fit into.

Supervisory objectives – tailoring rules yet widening supervision

The practical aim of this new regime is to ensure that the prudential i.e. the regulatory capital framework applicable to Investment Firms" better captures and regulates risks2 that are specific to MiFID business". Such a new regime equally aims to differentiate itself from the prudential regulation framework for banks, including as applied in the Eurozone-19's Banking Union in which the European Central Bank leads in the Single Supervisory Mechanism (ECB-SSM). However, the differentiation is not complete as Class 1 Investment Firms that undertake "banking sector comparable activities" will be exempt from the new rules and will continue to fall under the CRR/CRD IV prudential regime for banks. For firms headquartered in the Banking Union, this will mean being supervised by the ECB-SSM. This is aligned with the intention of the Eurozone bank supevisor which, in the context of BREXIT-relocations and otherwise, has stated that it should have supervisory oversight over "investment banks" i.e., often firms that are MiFID Investment Firms, in order to ensure a level playing field.

Whilst most of the proposed Recommendations apply to all Class 2 and 3 Investment Firms, some apply specifically only to those that are "Commodity Derivatives Investment Firms" (CDIFs) i.e., as such term is used within the meaning of the MiFID II/MiFIR Framework. The proposals do not apply to funds and their managers that fall within the AIFMD or UCITS Frameworks. That being said, the proposed legislation will impact any group that includes one or more Investment Firms, categorised as Class 2 or 3. Both banking and fund sector participants often split MiFID business either by choice or because regulatory requirements make it an obligation to do so into MiFID Investment Firms that are then affiliated entities in the same group. Consequently, a number of groups may want to check their legal entity structuring and possibly the options on how to optimise their regulatory capital requirements.

The affected Investment Firms, including their counterparties, may want to take note of the economic and regulatory costs of the new rules. Those considerations are however not self-contained. Rather, they will have a host of spillover effects including in what this might mean for various financial models and financing needs. However, these proposals may also present opportunities to streamline or optimise financing or standby-facilities prior to the relevant changes applying and a host of competitors needing financing.

What is certain is that any change in the prudential regulation of Investment Firms will likely redraw the map for existing as well as new market participants. These potential changes come on top of any MiFID II/MiFIR compliance priorities that will continue to impact "change the business" along with run the business" workstreams as well as strategic projects for Investment Firms.

How do the K-Factors amend the landscape?

The Commission recognised the wide-reaching scope of application of the regime and breadth of changes required to implement the new rules by granting a three year transition period. During this period, the capital requirements will be limited to twice what they would have been under the old regime.

The new proposed prudential capital rules are likely to be of relevance to those Investment Firms within the EU-27, including the Eurozone-19 and ultimately those relocating, whether from the UK or elsewhere, to the EU.

A move to a much more tiered and proportionate capital regime will potentially be costly. Aside from regulatory capital in terms of minimum own funds, it will equally place a greater emphasis on firms and their risk controls so as to minimise individual risk types with an aim to reduce their risk capital. This is especially the case given the importance Investment Firms' exposures to certain risks will play in calculating regulatory capital needs in this new regime. These risk types are referred to as "K-Factors" and are based on quantitative indicators.

The "Class" that an Investment Firm will fall into will trigger the relevant minimum amount of regulatory capital levels. The allocation to a specific Class is driven by both the type of MiFID Investment Activity (i.e., qualitative consideration) and the K-Factor values (i.e., quantitative considerations). For many firms, especially for so called "exempt CAD" advisory firms such as those relocating from the UK, the regulatory capital could go from EUR 5,000 to 75,000. For the breadth of other Investment Firms, the increases could go from EUR 50,000 to 75,000, possibly 150,000 up to a maximum of EUR 5 million for so-called Class 1 Investment Firms and/ or credit institutions.

In short, K-Factors are clearly costly in terms of increased own fund requirements but will also likely be costly in terms of investment in systems and resources needed to identify, mitigate and manage risks generally as well as those specifically relevant to the K-Factors. A number of affected firms will most likely look to recoup the costs elsewhere.

Below is an overview of the K-Factors, which have been grouped into three catagories, reflecting three risk types:

K-Factor type proposed in IFR Overall K-Factor(s) – relevant components and coefficients not discussed Description
Risk to Customers (RtC) K-AUM Assets under management – under both discretionary portfolio management and non-discretionary (advisory) arrangements.
K-CMH Client money held.
K-ASA Assets safeguarded and administered.
K-COH Client orders handled - execution only in name of customer and reception and transmission of orders.
Risk to Market (RtM) K-NPR Net position risk - based on the market risk requirements of the CRR II Proposal and made appropriate for investment firms (only applicable to trading book positions).
K-CMG Clearing member guarantee – amount of initial margins posted with a clearing member, where the execution and settlement of transactions of an investment firm dealing on own account take place under the responsibility of a general clearing member.
Risk to Firm (RtF) K-DTF Daily trading flow - value of transactions where the firm is trading on own name (on own account or in execution of client orders) (only applicable to trading book positions).
K-TCD Trading counterparty default - based on the BCBS proposals for counterparty credit risk and simplified for investment firms (only applicable to trading book positions). Takes into account OTC derivatives (presume this is ought to be MiFID II instruments), "long-settlement transactions" (undefined), "repurchase transactions" (repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions but not those that are Securities Financing Transactions for the purposes of the same named Regulation), and "securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions" (again - no clarity on whether these include Securities Financing Transactions for the purposes of the same named Regulation).
K-CON Concentration - taking inspiration form the CRR large exposures regime for trading book and simplified for investment firms (only applicable to trading book positions).

How does this interlink with BREXIT and Investment Firms' preparations?

Many Investment Firms may want to consider varying their permissions or apply for new permissions prior to these new rules taking effect and the prudential capital regime possibly making business "more expensive". These rules should also be read in conjunction with the supervisory principles on relocation (SPoRs) as collectively these developments will affect BREXIT-proofing plans in terms of strategy as well as which legal entities will do what where and with whom.

This is the case not only for those standalone Investment Firms that are subject to ESMA's SPoRs and the ESMA SSOs, but also to those Investment Firms that are part of a group with a banking licence and subject to EU-27 relevant supervisory expectations. More importantly these considerations also apply within the Eurozone-19 and firms will need to assess how these changes interact with the supervisory priorities and expectations of the Banking Union and its Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) led by the European Central Bank.

How can affected Investment Firms stay ahead of the curve?

The continous regulatory changes, including amendments to the CRD IV/CRR Framework as well the SPoRs will keep Investment Firms extremely busy. Thus, sourcing and allocating committed resources will be a priority and one that will help market participants to stay ahead of the curve.

Setting-up dedicated internal project teams and early channels of communication to counsel should ease the compliance burden. It will also help scenario plan all various impacts of the K-Factors and how to calibrate risk controls to reduce both conduct of business but more directly the prudential capital charges.

Linking these priorities into BREXIT-proofing workstreams, might mean that Investment Firms may wish to consider retaining appropriate legal and regulatory specialists, both within internal and external project teams that can draft, implement and ensure compliance with EU, Eurozone, respective national levels as well as third-country regimes. This dedicated workstream, whilst needing to be interoperable with regulatory authorisation applications and relocation workstreams, might be beneficial in running separately so as to ensure it has a sufficient degree of independence and an ability to challenge assumptions made by those advising on the relocation plans.

So any chance that this will all go away? Quite unlikely. This workstream has been a longstanding supervisory priority and one that also delivers on the overarching convergence goals as part of the wider Capital Markets Union project. That being said, the EU legislative process takes time. The timeline is likely to be protracted as a lot of the fine details are ironed out in the Regulatory Technical Standards. As other regulatory reform projects have shown, forward planning helps stay ahead of the curve and can be done with a view to what already exists in other areas where similar regulatory/supervisory concepts exist.

So will supervisors have enough resources to police? One point that is not clear from the September Opinion is whether the reference to competent authorities" is deliberate. Typically, in EU regulatory parlance the reference to competent authorities refers to these as those national bodies. If this oversight is deliberate then is this a nod towards centralised oversight of Investment Firms by a pan-EU authority rather than national supervisors? Given that the September Opinion takes a forward-looking view on a number of developments, is this the anchoring of concepts pending institutional reform of supervisors and their mandates? As above, if other policymakers and supervisors enter the fray, any final regime building on the September Opinion's Recommendations could change further.

Moreover, it is worth noting that in the margins of the ESMA Annual Conference on 17 October 2017 in Paris, statements indicated a policy consideration whereby Class 1 Investment Firms, possibly some Class 2 Investment Firms could become subject to centralised supervision at some future undefined date. That would be a massive change and reintroduces wider questions on whether a single Capital Markets Union supervisor comparable to the Banking Union and its SSM might be a longer-term supervisory policy goal in delivery or merely at the planning stage. Indeed, the European Banking Authority's (EBA) General Opinion on Supervisory Principles on Relocations3, which is aimed at improving supervisory convergence in light of BREXIT, specifically calls for Class 1 Investment Firms to be subject to centralised supervision and proposes that the ECB-SSM is in the lead.

In conclusion, the IFR and IFD proposal is the beginning of the end of a long process to make Investment Firms subject to prudential regulatory capital levels that are more reflective of their actual and potential risk profile. It comes on top of a full agenda and merits early action especially if this workstream is a building block for more widespread change that remains on the policymakers' agendas as they progress the completion of the Single Market, the Single Rulebook and delivery of the Capital Markets Union.

To read this article in full, please click here.

Footnotes

1. Applying a greater degree of proportionality in regulatory reform is now a key priority for policymakers when advancing supervisory convergence across the EU. See specifically statements from Roberto Gualtieri, MEP, Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON), European Parliament in a Keynote Speech given at the ESMA Annual Conference on 17 October 2017 in Paris. This also assists in the overarching aim to get to the desired ,end-state' of how financial services are regulated across the EU, with a much more, level playing field' driven by a Single Market built upon a Single Rulebook that is much more uniform

2. including an ability to account for an orderly wind down.

3. See a full list of our Client Alert series on the SPoRs available from our dedicated Eurozone Hub resources.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions