UK: Tom Morrison Essay Prize: Focus On The Subsidiaries

Last Updated: 9 July 2018
Article by Elizabeth Colvin

An extract from the winning submission for the Tom Morrison Essay Prize

Tom Morrison Essay Prize

The competition was launched in 2016 in memory of Tom Morrison FCIS – an active member and past president of ICSA and a highly regarded and influential member of the share registration industry – and encourages new thinking and recognises original approaches to governance. Now in its third year, this year's competition sought essay submissions that demonstrated an original perspective on the following topic:

'It has been said that governance failures usually happen within the subsidiary structure of a large business, but all governance focus tends to be at the main board level. Is the focus on the right area and, if not, what improvements could be made?'

Following the accounting scandal at the Italian subsidiary of British Telecom, it was remarked that 'if there is not strong supervision from the mother ship over the smaller vessels, things such as financial irregularities and fraud will almost certainly happen'1. Of the many governance failures that have occurred in recent memory, it can also be observed that many of these have occurred within the subsidiary structure, where there is not an imposed requirement for corporate governance, rather than at the main board level.

Recent notable examples include the accounting scandal relating to overstated profits at the FTSE-listed Tesco plc's subsidiary Tesco Stores Ltd, the previously mentioned accounting irregularities scandal at the Italian subsidiary of FTSE-listed British Telecom plc and, in Switzerland, the recent scandal with the government-owned PostBus subsidiary understating its earnings to claim millions in government subsidies.

Arguably, for entities listed in the UK, with a corporate governance code that focuses requirements at the main board level combined with a number of recent high-profile governance issues that have been revealed in the subsidiary structures, now is the time to consider whether there should be more focus on subsidiary governance measures, rather than further focus at the main board level.

Over the course of this essay, I will consider whether a main board-centric approach to corporate governance is appropriate in a landscape comprising a wide variety of legal entities and will review a number of measures that could be implemented or extended to improve governance at a subsidiary level.

Existing corporate governance codes: A tool for subsidiary governance?

A theme that can be seen across many of the existing important corporate governance codes, particularly those that have their basis in the UK Corporate Governance Code (UKCGC), is they are rooted in the belief that good governance standards will have a trickledown effect if the right tone is set at the highest level.

The UKCGC focuses its requirements on the main board and suggests that governance should come through top-down leadership: 'it is important that the board sets the correct "tone from the top"2, comparatively, while still asserting this, the new King Report on Corporate Governance (King IV) has 'ethical and effective leadership'3 at its foundation. In South Africa, therefore, it could be argued that the importance of subsidiary governance, in addition to governance measures for the main board, is already recognised.

King IV not only requires all companies to apply and then explain how they manage the risk associated with subsidiary governance, but also views subsidiary entities as stakeholders of the group4. Part V of the code on stakeholder relationships outlines a number of recommended practices for how subsidiary governance within the group should be approached5.

King IV became applicable for financial years starting on or after 1 April 2017 and it will be interesting to see if these recommended practices prevent governance failures within the subsidiary structure as it continues to be applied. Should a demonstrably positive effect be evident, it may be the ideas in the recommended practices of King IV be considered to be included as provisions in future versions of the UKCGC.

Alternatively, if subsidiaries were to be included within the definition of stakeholders that directors of the main board should have consideration while discharging their duties under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, this could also become an area of reporting in future. While a focus can be observed in the UK towards strengthening the stakeholder voice at board level, the scope of stakeholders that are currently outlined in section 172 does not include subsidiaries and legislative change would need to be considered for reporting to legitimately be required on subsidiaries as stakeholders.

Following the collapse of British Home Stores (BHS), in 2016, its failure was attributed, in part, to weak corporate governance which enabled Sir Philip Green to 'use a network of private companies to channel profits to a family business located offshore'6. It is unsurprising therefore that the government consultation on corporate governance included a suggestion to extend the application of the UKCGC, which at the moment only applies to listed companies, to large privately held businesses.

It was recognised it would be inappropriate to extend an obligation to comply with the UKCGC to smaller or subsidiary companies, while simultaneously acknowledging that many companies already adopt elements of the corporate governance framework in their subsidiary businesses as part of their internal risk management7. I believe this is the right response regarding smaller entities as the UKCGC has been drafted with listed entities with a premium listing in mind and many of the requirements would be inappropriate for smaller subsidiary entities. Although it could prove beneficial if adoption of elements of the UKCGC, on a voluntary basis, were to be encouraged at a subsidiary governance level.

With a corporate landscape that seems to show a decline in the number of listed companies and an increase in private entities8, reform consultation on the implementation of a code for large private companies may highlight how the government perceives the future of corporate governance. It is unsurprising therefore that one of the areas of reform that the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) corporate governance reform consultation focused on was improving corporate governance in large private companies.

The recommendation provided that a voluntary code be developed to be adopted by the largest private companies but 'should the voluntary regime fail to raise standards after a three-year period, or reveal high rates of acceptable non-compliance, then a mandatory regulatory regime should be introduced'9. Noting there already exist voluntary governance codes for unlisted entities, the corporate governance code applicable to large private companies that has been suggested could go some way to impose higher corporate governance standards if the voluntary measures are widely applied and may allay concerns a repeat of the BHS collapse could be experienced. The code may also be an important first step towards a mandatory code, firstly for large privately owned companies and, possibly in future, for all privately owned subsidiary entities.

While I think this could be a positive step for group structures where a large private company is at the top, a potential area for concern could be in the creation of complexities in reporting in instances where a large private company is a subsidiary, such as service companies frequently seen in a group structure. This could have the result that 'complexities would arise if these subsidiaries would fall within the remit of a separate governance code'10.


1 Financial Times BT Italia scandal sparks soul searching over global, 1 July 2017

2 UK Corporate Governance Code 2016, preface, p.6

3 Institute of Directors Southern Africa, King IV: Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016, p.10

4 Institute of Directors Southern Africa, King IV: Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016, p.7

5 Institute of Directors Southern Africa, King IV: Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016, Part V, p.72

6 House of Commons, Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. Corporate Governance. Third report of Session 2016–17, p.30

7 2016 Corporate Governance Reform: Green Paper, p.46

8 House of Commons, Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. Corporate Governance. Third report of Session 2016–17, p.31


10 GC100: conference on corporate governance, business and society Practical Law Corporate. p.8

This is an extract. To read the full winning and runner-up essays, visit

Elizabeth Colvin is assistant company secretary at Eversheds Sutherland

With the introduction of a code for large private limited companies potentially signalling a future appetite for the implementation of codes for smaller entities, care would need to be taken so that these are drafted in a way that would be harmonious to the UKCGC and ensure that the reporting and governance requirements conflicts are not created.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions