UK: Solicitors Liable In Linked Dreamvar And P&P Appeals

Last Updated: 22 May 2018
Article by Vicky Hardy and James Preece

Most Read Contributor in UK, November 2018

Dreamvar (UK) Limited v Mishcon de Reya and Mary Monson Solicitors Limited, and P & P Property Limited v Owen White & Catlin LLP

The judgment still transfers the risk of property fraud onto solicitors, but it shifts the position as to which solicitors should bear the losses where a fraudster impersonates the owner of a property in a sale. Solicitors representing imposter vendors can now face exposure to the losses of innocent purchasers on the basis of breach of trust, breach of undertaking and, potentially, for breach of warranty of authority.    

Solicitors representing innocent purchasers in an imposter sale scenario will still face a breach of trust finding, but should be able to obtain a contribution (potentially amounting to a full indemnity) from the solicitors acting for the imposter vendor, given that those solicitors are best placed to identify the fraud.  On the basis of the judgment, they will not be relieved of this breach of trust.


Dreamvar (UK) Ltd ("Dreamvar") v Mishcon de Reya ("Mishcon") & Mary Monson Solicitors ("MMS")

  1. Dreamvar instructed Mishcon to act on its behalf in respect of the purchase of a property in Earls Court, London ("Property 1") for £1.1m. 
  2. Mr Haeems was the registered owner of Property 1.  MMS were instructed in respect of the sale of Property 1, but their instructions were from a fraudster impersonating Mr Haeems. 
  3. The sale went through with monies transferred to the imposter vendor.  The fraud was identified by the Land Registry prior to registration, leaving Dreamvar with substantial losses.

P & P Property Limited ("P & P") v Owen White & Catlin LLP ("OWC")

  1. P & P instructed Peter Brown & Co to act on its behalf in respect of the purchase of a property at 52 Brackenbury Road, London ("Property 2") for £1.03m. 
  2. Mr Harper was the registered owner of Property 2.  OWC were instructed in respect of the sale of Property 2, but their instructions came from a fraudster impersonating Mr Harper. 
  3. The sale went through with monies transferred to the imposter vendor.  Thereafter the fraud was identified, leaving P & P with substantial losses.

High Court decisions

Dreamvar sought to recover its losses from Mishcon and MMS.  At first instance it was held that:

  • MMS had not acted in breach of trust, breach of undertaking or in breach of warranty of authority;
  • Mishcon were not negligent but were in breach of trust;
  • Mishcon were not granted relief for breach of trust, in essence due to the financial consequences of the breach of trust for Dreamvar compared to Mishcon who had professional indemnity insurance.

P&P sought to recover its losses from OWC and the selling agents, Winkworth, but did not pursue a claim against its own solicitors.  The outcome at first instance was as follows:

  • The claims against OWC for negligence, breach of trust, breach of undertaking and breach of warranty of authority were dismissed. 
  • The claims against Winkworth for breach of warranty of authority and negligence were also dismissed.

Grounds for appeal

Mishcon and Dreamvar appealed the High Court judgment that there was no breach of trust or breach of undertaking by MMS.  Perhaps unsurprisingly given pre-existing Court of Appeal authority on the absence of 'completion' in fraudulent transactions leading to a finding of breach against purchaser's solicitors, Mishcon did not seek to overturn the breach of trust finding against itself, but rather again sought relief under section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925 if it was successful on the other aspects of the appeal (the judge having commented that if MMS had been in breach of trust he would have relieved Mishcon).  Dreamvar did not allege negligence against MMS at first instance, but sought permission to add a claim in negligence. P & P appealed the High Court judgment on all issues.


The Court of Appeal concluded (as was the case at first instance) that Mishcon had not been negligent in their conduct of the transaction.

As regards OWC and MMS, it was held that these were not cases where the seller's solicitors (or agents) had actually or voluntarily assumed responsibility to the purchasers for the adequacy of the due diligence performed in relation to their client in these arm's length transactions. As such, the first instance judge was right to dismiss the claim in negligence against OWC (and Winkworth), and the application to add the negligence claim against MMS was dismissed.

Breach of warranty of authority

This issue was not the subject of appeal in Dreamvar. In P & P, the Court of Appeal made a finding that a solicitor acting for a seller who signs and exchanges contracts is deemed to warrant that he has the authority of the true owner, not just the authority of the client who gave instructions.  The implications of that are obvious.  It was, however, held that there was no reliance on the warranty in this particular case.

As regards the selling agent, Winkworth, they had only prepared a memorandum of sale based on particulars from the purported vendor, so were not in breach of warranty of authority.

Breach of undertaking

Consideration was given to paragraph 7 of the Law Society Code for Completion by Post (2011) (the "Code") which states that the seller's solicitor undertakes "to have the seller's authority to receive the purchase money on completion".  The conclusion at first instance was that the reference to the seller was to the person agreeing to sell the property, not the true owner, but the Court of Appeal took the view that the proper construction of the Code means that OWC and MMS gave undertakings that they had the authority of the true owners to receive the purchase monies and thus were in breach.

Breach of trust

As regards OWC and MMS, at first instance in both cases the trial judges considered paragraph 3 of the Code which states that the seller's solicitor is not required "to investigate or take responsibility for any breach of the seller's contractual obligations".  This was construed as excluding liability for breach of trust.  The Court of Appeal however took the view that this could not be construed so as to absolve liability for breach of trust, and even less so as giving authority to release purchase monies in the absence of a genuine completion. Since completion (meaning the completion of a genuine contract by way of an exchange of real money in payment of the balance of the purchase price for real documents that will give the purchaser the means of registering the transfer of title) did not take place, the vendor's solicitors (in both cases) had no authority to release the money to the client. MMS and OWC were therefore now found to be in breach of trust.

Section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925

The court has the power to relieve a firm from sanction for breach of trust where they acted honestly and reasonably, but for relief to be granted the court must be satisfied that it is fair to do so bearing in mind that relief would be at the expense of the innocent purchaser.

At first instance Mishcon were not granted relief as it was considered this would have been disastrous for Dreamvar who had no recourse elsewhere, whereas Mishcon had the benefit of a professional indemnity policy.  Despite the trial judge indicating he would have granted relief to Mishcon if MMS was liable to Dreamvar, the Court of Appeal still declined to grant relief to Mishcon.  It was instead concluded that any distribution of liability should be achieved through contribution proceedings.  In a dissenting judgment on this aspect alone, Gloster LJ took the view that Mishcon should be relieved.  MMS had the primary responsibility to check identity, and the existence of insurance should not lead to the conclusion that Mishcon ought to pay (in particular given MMS' insurance could meet the claim), and nor should contribution proceedings be encouraged.

MMS did not seek relief under section 61, but OWC did. This was declined as the Court of Appeal considered that they could not be said to have acted reasonably given there were a series of failures to carry our basic identity checks.


This Court of Appeal decision means that buyers who fall victim to imposter vendors have even greater protection, with a potential right of recourse against the vendor's solicitors as well as their own. It is perhaps surprising that Mishcon were not granted relief in circumstances where MMS was held liable to Dreamvar, but contribution proceedings (if agreement on contribution cannot be reached) ought to achieve an appropriate allocation of liability.  This could potentially amount to a full indemnity for Mishcon, in circumstances where they were held to have acted reasonably and honestly but MMS did not carry out adequate due diligence on their client which might have prevented the fraud.

Conveyancing practices may be subject to change as a result of this decision, to include solicitors acting for a purchaser wanting express confirmations and warranties from solicitors acting for a seller with a view to minimising their own exposure to a purchaser in this type of scenario.  Solicitors acting for vendors will also need to take greater care to ensure their client, the purported seller of the property, is in fact the genuine owner. There is the prospect that the Law Society may seek to make amendments to the Code as a result of this decision.

Lenders will often have crime insurance to protect against fraud risk, and there is a suggestion that a form of property fraud indemnity insurance for purchasers would be a welcome offering from the insurance market.  The exercise of relief under section 61 may be exercised differently where a Claimant has its own insurance.  Alternatively we may find that Mishcon seeks permission to appeal in light of Gloster LJ's comments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
Clyde & Co
Clyde & Co
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
Clyde & Co
Clyde & Co
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions