European Union: SJ Berwin´s Community Week: A Weekly Summary Of Competition Law And Policy Developments

Last Updated: 11 November 2008
Article by SJ Berwin's EU & Competition Team


Lloyds/HBOS Merger Cleared Despite Competition Concerns

The proposed acquisition of HBOS by Lloyds TSB has been given the green light by the Secretary of State (Lord Mandelson).  The merger had been "called-in" by the Secretary of State using his newly acquired powers to intervene on financial stability grounds.  The Secretary of State acknowledged that there were competition concerns as set out in a report from the Office of Fair Trading ("OFT"), but was satisfied that on balance the public interest was best served by allowing the merger to proceed without a reference to the Competition Commission.  (For further information on the Secretary of State's intervention, please see Community Week Issue 394). 

The OFT conducted a month long review of the proposed merger and published its report on 31 October, coinciding with the Secretary of State's decision. The OFT concluded that the proposed acquisition could potentially result in a substantial lessening of competition, meriting an in-depth investigation by the Competition Commission. 

The OFT assessed the merger in light of the turbulent state of the financial markets, concluding that there is a "realistic prospect" of a substantial lessening of competition ("SLC") in three markets. 

  • With respect to personal current accounts, concerns are identified at both national and local levels as the merger is expected to further strengthen an existing market leader (Lloyds TSB), increase its market share, and shift the focus from competing for new customers to enhancing margins on its current customers. 
  • For banking services to small and medium enterprises, concerns are focused on reduced incentives to compete for new customers primarily in the Scottish market. 
  • In the case of mortgages, while the OFT believes that there is a realistic prospect of an SLC, its concerns are more marginal, although the OFT did note that the cost of a "wrongful clearance" under such circumstances could be very high.  There are concerns that there may be greater barriers to entry and reduced customer switching. 

Despite these concerns, the Secretary of State gave regulatory clearance to the merger on 31 October.  He did however ask the OFT to "continue to keep the relevant markets under review in order to protect the interests of UK consumers and the British economy" (an area the OFT has had its eye on for a while - with the personal current account market in particular being under scrutiny).

Although the clearance is not entirely surprising, this is the first time that the UK public interest intervention powers have been used to clear a merger deemed to merit a reference to the Competition Commission.

Competition Commission Reports On Charges At Stansted Airport

The Competition Commission's ("the CC") report and recommendations on airport charges at Stansted airport ("Stansted") was published this week.  This report is important as, if the CC's recommendations are adopted by the Civil Aviation Authority ("the CAA"), BAA (Stansted's owner), will be able to impose higher charges on airlines using the airport.  Moreover, the criticism leveled at BAA may mean that airlines and travelers will see significant changes in the way that the airport is run in the future.

In terms of airport charges, the CC rejected calls for the removal of price controls altogether (as had been proposed by the CAA last year) and instead recommended that, during the five year period beginning in April 2009, BAA may increase its airport charges at Stansted by 21 pence per passenger. This is less than the increase suggested by BAA (which asked for more to assist with the costs of the new runway it is seeking to build). The findings will also be disappointing for Ryanair, which has been asking for lower levies at Stansted (its main UK base) for a number of years.

The CC also highlighted a number of areas where BAA is considered to have acted against the public interest. It was noted how the introduction of new security arrangements had given rise to "unacceptable delays" for passengers and that development plans (especially the construction of a new runway and terminal) had not been adequately consulted on. The CC underlined the importance of strong channels of communication between BAA and airlines, since "airline customers are generally in a much better position than the regulator to suggest what development is needed". The CC has suggested the introduction of a quality rebate scheme, imposing financial penalties if BAA fails to meet agreed standards (as is already in place at Heathrow and Gatwick) and offering off-peak discounts to the largest aircraft (currently excluded from such a benefit).

The CAA will now consider the recommendations before announcing its final decision in March 2009.  Given the current economic situation (and the resulting uncertainties as to passenger numbers), the CC has stated that its findings should be kept under review. Similarly, the unstable economy led the CC to query the wisdom of pursuing extension plans at Stansted. These concerns will no doubt be picked up during the planning enquiry into BAA's application to expand the airport timetabled for next year.

The CC's report follows its preliminary findings in August this year that BAA should be required to sell two of its three London sites as well as either Glasgow or Edinburgh.  In September, BAA put Gatwick up for sale but so far no moves have been made regarding Stansted.

Breach Of Procurement Rules Leads High Court In Northern Ireland To Set Aside Framework Agreement

The High Court in Northern Ireland (the "High Court") has set aside a decision of the Northern Irish Department of Finance and Personnel to enter into a framework agreement on the basis that the award process for the agreement was found to have breached the Public Contracts Regulations 2006.  The framework agreement may now be re-tendered (with the tender being open only to the 11 original tenderers) or dispensed with altogether (with separate procurements for each of the contracts that were to be awarded under the framework agreement).

The framework agreement, for construction contracts for urban regeneration projects, was entered into earlier this year between the Department and five contractors and was due to last for four years.  However, no individual contracts (so-called "call off contracts") have ever been awarded under the framework agreement.

One of the unsuccessful tenderers raised an action challenging the process (it had finished sixth out of eleven tenderers just behind those 'winning' tenderers which came fourth and fifth). The High Court found that the Department had breached the procurement rules by failing to disclose to bidders some of the detailed sub-award criteria and their corresponding weightings which the evaluation panel subsequently took into account when assessing the final bids.

In a recent judgment the High Court addressed the issue of procurement remedies.  The procurement rules limit the remedies that can be awarded in respect of a concluded contract to damages.  However, the High Court ruled that this limitation did not apply to a concluded framework agreement.  The Court distinguished between (i) the top level "framework agreement", which involves the selection of parties who will go on to bid for specific contracts under the framework agreement and (ii) a "contract", which is awarded according to the terms of the framework agreement (possibly supplemented in a mini-competition) and involves specific parties performing works, services and/or supplies for consideration.  It concluded that the remedies available for breach of a framework agreement were broader than those available for breach of a contract and that in this instance the framework agreement could be set aside.  

The High Court considered that setting aside the framework agreement was preferable to adding the aggrieved tenderer to the framework agreement, which it considered would unfairly dilute the work of the five parties to the framework.

Under the New EC Remedies Directive (due to be implemented into national law by December 2009) certain completed contracts may be deemed 'ineffective' even after they have been concluded.  Given that this will be novel ground for UK procurement law, since in the past procurement remedies were limited to damages post-contract conclusion, the OGC is still considering the legal consequences of a contract being ineffective.


New Merger Thresholds Introduced Under The Law On The Modernisation Of The Economy

The law on the modernisation of the economy (the "LME"), enacted on 4 August 2008, introduces new turnover thresholds which relate specifically to mergers in the retail business sector or which involve companies active in the French overseas departments or territories (i.e. French West Indies, French Guiana, Reunion, Mayotte and Saint Pierre and Miquelon).  These specific thresholds will apply instead of the existing general thresholds.

These provisions will enter into force either on promulgation of the ordinance implementing the LME or on 1 January 2009 at the latest.

The specific thresholds will apply where either at least two of the undertakings involved in the merger run retail businesses or at least one of the undertakings involved in the merger runs all or part of its business in the French overseas departments or territories.

In such cases, the merger will have to be notified if: (i) the aggregate worldwide turnover of all the undertakings involved in the merger is over €75 million and (ii) as regards the retail sector, the aggregate turnover achieved in France in the retail business sector by at least two of the undertakings involved is over €15 million or (iii) as regards overseas activities, the aggregate turnover achieved individually by at least two of the undertakings, in at least one relevant French overseas departments or territories, is over €15 million.

As is the case for all mergers, the new Competition Authority (l'Autorité de la concurrence, see Issue 389 of Community Week) will only have jurisdiction over such mergers if they fall outside the scope of the European Merger Regulation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions