UK: UWOs And The Steady Expansion Of Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction Over Financial Crime

Last Updated: 19 April 2018
Article by Vanessa Reid

Speed Read: Vanessa Reid examines the ever-expanding jurisdiction of UK criminal courts over extra-territorial conduct, persons, and property.

As has been widely noted, the newly enforceable Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs)—created by the Criminal Finances Act 2017—have an aggressively extra-territorial reach. They apply to persons and property located anywhere in the world, and the suspected criminal conduct need not have taken place in the UK. Moreover, non-EEA Politically Exposed Persons are specifically identified as being subject to such orders. These broad powers represent the latest salvo in a long-running tug of war regarding the proper scope of extra-territorial jurisdiction in the UK's efforts to combat financial crime, money laundering, and corporate crime.

The presumption against extra-territoriality

There is a "well-established" canon of statutory construction that, in the absence of clear language to the contrary, an Act of Parliament should not be given extra-territorial effect.1 Courts have therefore been understandably cautious about extending the application of laws governing financial crime, money laundering, and criminal confiscation to property and conduct occurring outside the UK without clear direction from the legislature. Law enforcement agencies, on the other hand, have repeatedly pushed for ever-expanding powers to combat financial crime, including the power to address extra-territorial misconduct and seize assets held overseas.

King v Director of the SFO: External requests not a "gateway" to worldwide jurisdiction

The House of Lords first addressed the question of the extra-territorial reach of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) in the 2009 case King v Director of the SFO.2 The King decision held that under the statutory scheme set forth in POCA, a UK court responding to an "external request" made by an authority of a foreign country did not have jurisdiction to restrain or order the confiscation of assets held outside the UK.

In King, the South African prosecuting authority petitioned the UK for assistance in obtaining restraint and disclosure orders against the assets of a British subject residing in South Africa who had been charged with large-scale fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. The petition referred to assets "whether . . . in or outside England and Wales." The SFO therefore requested a worldwide freezing order.

The Crown Court judge determined that he had the power to make such a worldwide order.3 He found that POCA provisions requiring that an external request identify "relevant property in England and Wales" were merely a "gateway" to the exercise of the court's jurisdiction over property located overseas.4

The Court of Appeal disagreed, as did the House of Lords. Both courts found that orders made in response to external requests were limited to property in England and Wales.5 The House of Lords decision noted that to allow otherwise would lead to a "confusing, and possibly conflicting, overlap of international requests for assistance."6 In interpreting POCA's arguably conflicting provisions regarding overseas property and external requests, the decision cited the long-standing presumption against extra-territoriality in criminal law.7

The Bribery Act 2010 significantly expands worldwide jurisdiction

The Bribery Act 2010 created several new bribery-related offences applicable to individuals8 and a new offence applicable to commercial organisations that fail to prevent bribery by their employees or agents.9 In doing so, the Act significantly expanded the extra-territorial jurisdiction of UK courts, particularly with respect to business organisations.

The Act provides that courts enforcing the new individual bribery offences have jurisdiction over conduct which occurred entirely overseas if the individual who committed the act or omission has a "close connection" to the UK.10 This sweeps in all British citizens and nationals, regardless of their residence or the location of the relevant conduct, as well as any foreign nationals committing bribery-related offences anywhere in the world if they ordinarily reside in the UK.

The failure-to-prevent offence for commercial organisations establishes still broader extra-territorial jurisdiction. Section 12 of the Act provides that any commercial organisation carrying on a business or even part of a business in the UK may be prosecuted in the UK, regardless of where the relevant conduct took place or whether the person who committed the act or omission has any ties to the UK.11 This constituted a substantial extra-territorial extension of the jurisdiction of UK criminal courts and enforcement agencies,  going beyond what had been granted by previous legislation or the general criminal law.

Perry v SOCA: international civil recovery orders constitute "exorbitant jurisdiction"

In the 2012 case Perry v SOCA, the Supreme Court once more considered POCA proceedings with respect to overseas property, this time in response to a POCA Part 5 civil recovery action initiated by UK authorities.12

In Perry, the appellant was convicted by an Israeli court for offences relating to a complex pension fraud scheme that took place entirely in Israel. He subsequently served a prison sentence and paid a £3 million fine. UK authorities then learned that the appellant and several of his family members had bank accounts in London containing approximately £14 million. The Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) therefore sought and obtained disclosure and property freezing orders against the appellant and his family members in respect of all of their assets worldwide. None of the respondents were located in the UK at the time the orders were issued.

The Supreme Court held that POCA did not permit courts to issue freezing orders, disclosure orders, or civil recovery orders regarding property or persons located outside the jurisdiction. The Perry decision reasoned that permitting civil recovery proceedings in respect of property outside the court's jurisdiction would involve an "exorbitant jurisdiction in personam without any basis in international law [and] would also be likely to prove ineffective."13

The Crime and Courts Act 2013: Parliament expands scope of civil recovery powers

This strict interpretation of POCA's extra-territorial powers did not last long. The Perry decision was expressly overridden by Parliament in the Crime and Courts Act 2013, which amended POCA to authorise the making of a civil recovery or freezing order under Part 5 in respect of property "wherever situated" and a person "wherever domiciled, resident or present" as long as there was some connection between the case and the UK.14 This would prove a precursor to the equally broad powers soon to be granted with respect to UWOs.

R v. Rogers: Court of Appeal establishes jurisdiction over extra-territorial money laundering

Similar principles were soon extended to overseas money laundering. In the 2014 case R v Rogers, the Court of Appeal found that an individual can be prosecuted under POCA Part 7 for committing a money laundering offence even if the relevant conduct took place entirely outside the UK, so long as a significant part of the underlying criminal scheme took place in the UK and the scheme had harmful consequences in the UK.15 The Rogers case involved a UK citizen and monies derived from a criminal scheme which took place within the UK—only the money laundering itself took place overseas.

The court accepted the government's argument that, in spite of the historical presumption against extra-territoriality in criminal law, "more modern views on jurisdiction" hold that in the absence of any express geographical limitation in a statute, principles of international comity allow the court to look to where the "essence or gist of the offence" took place.16 The court also found that money laundering is "par excellence" an offence which transcends international boundaries, and it would therefore be "surprising" if Parliament had not intended the Act to have extra-territorial effect, in spite of the lack of any express language so providing.17

Some commentators have questioned the wisdom of the Rogers decision, noting its potentially significant impact on practitioners providing client services abroad.18 Jonathan Fisher points out that the decision leaves unaddressed the scope of the UK criminal courts' jurisdiction over non-UK citizens handling money outside the UK or those handling money derived from criminal conduct committed outside the UK.19 Fisher suggests that the case may have been wrongly decided, particularly given that Parliament had not yet spoken to the issue as it had in context of POCA Part 5 and the Bribery Act offences.

Corporate Facilitation Offences

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA) created two new corporate facilitation offences—sections 45 and 46—for failure by a company to prevent facilitation by its agents or employees of the evasion of UK or foreign taxes.20 For a firm to be liable under these provisions there must have been criminal tax evasion by a tax payer (either an individual or a firm) of UK or foreign law, criminal facilitation of the offence by a representative of the firm, and a failure by the firm to prevent its representative from committing the criminal facilitation. A business may mount a reasonable procedure defence, wherein it will not be held liable where it can show that it had implemented reasonable prevent procedures or where it can show that, in the circumstances, it would have been unreasonable or unrealistic to have expected it to have had procedures in place. 

The worldwide reach of these new offences mirrors that of the Bribery Act. Where there has been evasion of UK taxes, any company based anywhere in the world can be haled into a UK court, regardless of whether it conducts any business at all in the UK. Where foreign taxes have been avoided, a company may be liable if it is incorporated under the law of the UK, carrying on a business or part of a business in the UK, or the conduct constituting the criminal facilitation takes place within the UK.

UWOs and the on-going expansion of extra-territorial jurisdiction over financial crimes

As noted above, the introduction of UWOs by the CFA represents the latest advance in the steady expansion of the extra-territorial powers of UK criminal courts and law enforcement agencies over financial crime, money laundering, and corporate crime.21

UWOs are a civil investigatory tool requiring a non-EEA Politically Exposed Person or a person suspected of involvement in a serious crime—whether in the UK or elsewhere—to account for the source of any property valued at over £50,000 that cannot be explained by a known legitimate source of income.22 A UWO may be made in respect of "any property" so long as the other requirements for issuance are met.23 Failure to provide an adequate explanation for the property's origin will result in a presumption that such property is recoverable in any proceedings under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA). Moreover, knowingly or recklessly providing a materially false or misleading statement in response to a UWO is a criminal offence.24

Although the extra-territorial dimension of UWOs has received considerable attention, it is likely that practical difficulties in gathering information from other jurisdictions will be the biggest impediment to their widespread use overseas. Thus far, the focus of the prosecuting agencies requesting UWOs appears to be property situated in the UK.25 Time will tell whether the full promise (or threat) of UWOs with respect to extraterritorial property will be realised.

While it remains to be seen to what extent this new power will actually be put to use overseas, this new addition to POCA indicates Parliament's apparent willingness to continue expanding international jurisdiction over financial crime, money laundering and corporate crime whilst largely maintaining traditional territorial limitations in other areas of criminal law.


[1] Air India v Wiggins [1980] 71 Cr App R 213.

[2] King v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, [2009] UKHL 17.

[3] Id. [25].

[4] Id.

[5] Id. [31]-[32].

[6] Id. [31].

[7] Id. [32].

[8] The Bribery Act 2010 (Commencement) Order 2011 (SI No. 1418 of 2011) §§ 1, 2 and 6.

[9] Id. § 7.

[10] Id. § 12(2)-(4).

[11] Id. §12(5); Ministry of Justice, The Bribery Act 2010 – Guidance [15]-[16].

[12] Perry and Ors. v SOCA [2012] UKSC 35.

[13] Id. [69].

[14] CCA s. 48.

[15] [2014] EWCA Crim 1680.

[16] Id. [36]-[37].

[17] Id. [52].

[18] See Jonathan Fisher, "Case to answer: R v Rogers – implications for practitioners," BLL Portal (6 May 2015). (

[19] Id.

[20] Criminal Finances Act 2017 s. 45-46.

[21] Criminal Finances Act 2017 s. 1-3.

[22] POCA s. 362A-362B.

[23] POCA s. 362B.

[24] POCA s. 362E.

[25] See Mattha Busby, "First Ever UK Unexplained Wealth Order Issued," Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (2 March 2018).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions