UK: Cross-border Grouping - EU Law, ICI-v-Colmer

Last Updated: 3 May 1999
Cross-border Grouping - EU Law, ICI-v-Colmer

Although the Finance Bill itself does not contain any legislation that will clarify the position in UK law regarding cross-border grouping that follows from the decision of the European Court in the Colmer case of last year, and the subsequent Inland Revenue Press Release of earlier this year, the Budget Day Press Releases contain a hint of what is to come. In Press Release IR11, a statement is made that the Chancellor wishes to consider further a number of issues that arose out of the consultation process as to whether the taxation of capital gains of companies should be reformed in a similar way to that of individuals. These issues include "whether or not the capital gains group rules need to be updated in the light of business becoming increasingly international".

It will be noted that this statement says nothing about the question of whether existing capital gains grouping rules are contrary to EU law, particularly in the light of the decision of the European Court in the Colmer case. This is hardly surprising, as to make any such admission may be to force the Chancellor's hand in any possible future reform.

However, the statement is particularly interesting in the light of the interpretation that has been given by some tax advisers to the recent Inland Revenue Press Release in creating tax grouping schemes that are designed to exploit what these advisers consider to be the current state of the law.

It is worth recapping precisely what is at stake in the Colmer case. The Revenue have in the past considered that the following three statements reflect UK law:

1. A non-resident company cannot be the parent company of a 75% group.

2. If a UK parent company holds all the shares in a non-resident holding company, which in turn holds 75% of the shares in a UK trading company, then group relief cannot be surrendered between the UK parent company and the UK trading company using the link created by the intermediate non-resident company.

3. In a consortium situation, a company cannot be a holding company unless its business consists wholly or mainly of holding shares on UK companies which are 90% subsidiaries and are trading companies.

It was the third of these three statements that was tested in the Colmer case. Although the House of Lords had held that, in UK law, it was necessary for the business of a holding company to consist in the holding of shares in UK resident companies, the European Court decided that this interpretation restricts the freedom of the holding company to establish further subsidiaries in other member states, since to do so may be to prejudice the ability of group relief to flow through the holding company from the UK subsidiaries to the consortium members, and vica versa. However, on the facts of the Colmer case, the holding company would be unlikely to be assisted by this interpretation, as, at least in terms of simple number of subsidiaries, the majority of the subsidiaries of the holding company were resident in non-member states.

(It should be noted that the Court also stated that the test should not be applied simply to the number of subsidiaries, and that other factors, such as turnover and number of staff, should also be used in determining the relative importance of the subsidiaries).

It is now for the House of Lords to determine how this decision of the European Court should be applied in UK law. Hammond Suddards are acting for ICI on this case, and the case is currently listed to appear before the House of Lords on 29 June of this year. In the interim, however, the Inland Revenue have issued a statement as to how they intend to deal with the corporation tax cases which have been kept open pending the European Court's judgment. They have decided that "cases where the existence of a group or consortium is established by reference to a company or companies resident in the European Union ("EU") or European Economic Area ("EEA") may be settled on the basis that a group or consortium relationship does exist for group relief purposes". Furthermore, the Revenue have stated that:

"any corporation tax case which relies on a company or companies resident outside the EU/EEA for the establishment of a group or consortium relationship for group relief purposes will be considered after the final jugment of the House of Lords".

There are two things which are particularly interesting in this statement:

1. Strictly speaking, the European Court was only interested in issues regarding discrimination and freedom of establishment that arose out of a restrictive interpretation of the definition of the term "holding company". This is a definition which is relevant for consortium claims, not group claims. However, the Revenue statement refers to the question of the existence of a group, as well as a consortium. This would seem to indicate that they have decided that they need to revise their position on all three of the questions set out above - in other words, it should be possible to group through a non-UK but EU resident company, and through a non-UK but EU resident parent.

2. Given the fact that, until the House of Lords reconsider their last decision in the light of the decision of the European Court, their last decision remains the law, it is unclear quite on what the basis the Revenue can settle tax returns in the way set out in their statement. Either this is being done on a purely concessionary basis, or EU law is considered to have direct application and so UK law should, if necessary, simply be ignored in order to apply the overriding directives.

Whatever the basis in law of the Revenue statement, tax advisers are already using it in order to suggest group structures which rely on cross-border grouping within the EU being established by a non-UK but EU resident parent. Such structures, it is suggested, achieve two things:

1. Group or consortium relief may be surrendered between groups linked by the EU parent.

2. Provided the linking EU parent is non-UK resident, the groups will not be linked for capital gains purposes. Moreover, a disposal by the EU parent of one of the UK resident groups will not give rise to a UK tax charge, as the EU parent will not be subject to UK tax.

This form of structure may be attractive in a situation where it would be beneficial to enable group or consortium relief to be surrendered between groups that have a common funding parent, but which are, for all other purposes, essentially separate. Classically this will be the case in private equity funding, where it will be desirable to achieve the existence of a commercially separate UK sub-group without triggering a tax charge in the disposing holding company, or for that matter potential secondary liabilities in other members of a wider UK group. This does, however, rely upon the assumption that the Revenue will not consider that the statements of the European Court in the Colmer case do not have a still wider import, and are potentially applicable also in the context of capital gains tax grouping.

It is in this regard that the statement made at the beginning of this article regarding the question of whether capital gains group rules should be reformed in the light of business becoming increasingly international is particularly interesting. It may already be possible to argue under the authority of the judgment of the European Court in the Colmer case that the restriction contained in section 170(2)(a) TCGA 1992 that references to a company apply only to a company which is resident in the United Kingdom is discriminatory under EU law. The consequence of this would be that transfers between sister companies that are linked only by a common EU but non-UK resident parent should be capable of being made on a no gains no loss basis. It would follow from this, however, that such an EU parent should be capable of picking up a secondary liability under section 179(11).

It is far from clear that this is the case, however, and if the suggested reform of capital gains tax grouping does indeed take place that will enable capital losses to be transferred between members of a group, it would seem to follow from the Colmer case that it should be possible to create such groups simply through a link with a common EU resident parent.

To conclude, it may not be sensible to assume that a general reform is not about to take place in order to ensure that the UK's tax group rules conform to EU directives. The question of whether UK group income rules are discriminatory (the Hoechst and Pirelli appeals) has already been avoided, at least for the future, by the abolition of ACT. This, together with the Revenue Press Release regarding Colmer and the Budget Press Release IR11, appears to constitute clear indications of the future direction of tax jurisprudence in the light of EU law.

For further information please contact George Hardy, e-mail: Click Contact Link , 2 Park Lane, Leeds, LS3 IES, UK, Tel: + 44 113 284 7000

This article was first published in the Tax News - Special Finance Bill Edition issue of Hammond Suddards Tax News updates

The information and opinions contained in this article are provided by Hammond Suddards. They should not be applied to any particular set of facts without appropriate legal or other professional advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions