ARTICLE
6 March 2018

Norwich Pharmacal Orders - Sarayiah v Williams

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
Judge refuses to enforce Norwich Pharmacal order following errors in order
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2018] EWHC 342 (QB)

Judge refuses to enforce Norwich Pharmacal order following errors in order

The applicant obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order (NPO) against the respondents. He alleged that the NPO was breached by the respondents and he sought to enforce the NPO by committal proceedings. The sealed NPO had required the respondents to produce "The exact wording of any complaints made against the Claimant by any other person [and their identity]". The judge held that the presence of the square brackets was in itself enough to dispose of the committal application: "To my mind, the presence of the square brackets inevitably leads to ambiguity, as would be the case in any judgment or order. Are the identities to be revealed or not? Since the order is ambiguous as it stands, it is impossible for the Applicant to discharge the burden of proving a breach to the criminal standard".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More