UK: Lord Nicholls Rules OK?

Last Updated: 14 October 2008
Article by Mike Willis

Like love, 'dishonesty' is something you expect to recognise when you come across it, and that has been the starting point adopted by judges in most of the reported cases in recent years when the issue has arisen. The trouble is, when faced with the task of coining a working legal test and definition of dishonesty for use in civil cases, the courts have failed to fix on an unequivocal approach, setting an awkward challenge for lawyers when trying to advise their clients.

A further difficulty is that the principal focus has been on accessories and those who 'knowingly assist' in wrongful activity and it remains unclear whether the same test will, or should be, applicable in all civil contexts where the conduct of an individual comes under scrutiny.

The issue of uncertainty is whether the conduct in question should be judged against a strictly objective standard of honesty, or whether the subjective circumstances and understanding of the perpetrator should also be taken into account. Since 1995 there have been specifically relevant decisions by two Privy Councils, two House of Lords, four Courts of Appeal, and three Divisional Courts (hearing appeals from the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal), and by assorted trial judges. Yet the law is likely to remain in flux at least in some respects. This is primarily because the 3 : 2 majority decision by the House of Lords in Twinsectra v Yardley1 (2002) was broadly understood by lawyers and academics to have set a legal test which required both, first, an objective appraisal as to whether the defendant was, in fact, as Lord Hutton put it, "transgressing ordinary standards of honest behaviour" and then, second, an enquiry into his own state of mind as to what "he knows would offend normally accepted standards...". This dual test has proved difficult and frequently controversial to apply in practice in subsequent cases, with the second limb of it being interpreted variously against wide-ranging or inexplicit criteria.

The Privy Council revisited the issue four years later in Barlow Clowes v Eurotrust2 (2006), setting its own interpretation of the second limb of the test as a requirement simply to apply the objective analysis to what the person in fact knew at the time, and not as a test of their subjective values and appreciation. Lord Nicholls asserted that "acting dishonestly ... means simply not acting as an honest person would in the circumstances [knowing what he did]"; and Lord Hoffman made clear that "although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. If by ordinary standards a defendant's mental state would be characterised as dishonest, it is irrelevant that the defendant judges by different standards".

Despite the lack of status of Privy Council decisions in English law, especially on an issue already covered by the House of Lords, this approach has been endorsed by subsequent courts and commentators as an important 'clarification' of the ambiguities arising from the law lords' judgments in Twinsectra. An article by the Master of the Rolls Sir Anthony Clarke3, which followed an oral presentation in April 20064, has been particularly influential. To those who heard that speech (including the writer) it was recognisable as a significant and deliberate steer, at least to the solicitors profession he presides over. It is unsurprising that it has been cited with approval by the trial judges in two leading cases. Sir Anthony concluded his oral delivery with a comment, not appearing in the written texts, that "Lord Nicholls rules OK"; a reference to his own view that the approach adopted by his Lordship as Privy Councillor in both Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan in19955 and Barlow Clowes ten years later "is in the ascendant". His article has been cited, and the objective test applied, by the trial judge Peter Smith J in Zambia v Meer Care & Desai (2007)6, who summarised the test in light of Barlow Clowes in terms:

"The test is ... an objective one which takes account of the individual in question's characteristics, experience, knowledge etc. .........It ...requires a court to assess an individual's conduct according to an objective standard of dishonesty. In doing so, a court has to take account of what the individual knew, his experience, intelligence and reasons for acting as he did. Whether the individual was aware that his conduct fell below the objective standard is not part of the test. "

This approach has not been questioned, at least in the first of several Court of Appeal decisions in the Zambia case listed for judgment in July 2008. It was also followed, again at first instance, recently by Teare J in Markel International Insurance Co Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd (3 June 2008)7.

That said, as Sir Anthony emphasised, the liabilities contemplated in the leading cases so far referred to have been concerned with claims for equitable fiduciary breach or knowing assistance to breach of trust, which "are not a form of liability which arises in restitution"; and the judgments are well laced with cautions that a rule or test for one area of the law, explicitly cases involving accessories to other people's wrongdoings, may not be appropriate for others where the allegations assert more direct perpetration. In most such situations, as in the Markel case, the primary wrongdoers' liabilities arise under torts of Conspiracy, Fraud or Deceit, which have their own jurisprudence, and the Twinsectra issues are critical only for those defendants who were accessories or facilitators.

Yet there seems no obvious reason why the same test should not be applicable for all civil liability cases driven by parties' alleged misconduct where their honesty is in issue, or at least claims for financial loss, including simple contract claims, such as the application and enforceability of an exclusion under an insurance policy or service agreement; or procedural decisions such as deliberate concealment (for limitation purposes) or non-party costs awards.

Whether a purely objective approach is appropriate for non-pecuniary civil liability cases may be more problematic. A particular area of civil jurisprudence where the courts may yet be loath to dispense with a full enquiry into a respondent's subjective understanding of an honesty 'standard' (as well as factual knowledge) is appeals from professional disciplinary tribunals. In Bryant v Law Society (December 2007)8, a Solicitors Tribunal finding of dishonesty against Bryant, for his involvement in and facilitation of some complex fraudulent commercial dealings by his clients, was overturned by the Divisional Court. It preferred to follow the pre-Barlow Clowes interpretation of Twinsectra, applied by three earlier divisional courts and at least one Court of Appeal9, maintaining that for solicitors involved in dubious transactions, the applicable tests for their dishonesty require both an objective analysis against the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people, and a properly conscientious subjective investigation as to whether they had been aware that by those standards they were acting dishonestly. In that regard the tradition of applying a test more closely analogous to the 'mens rea' principles applied by the criminal courts (most prominently endorsed in R v Ghosh (1982))10 has obvious attraction.

Disciplinary proceedings for professional misconduct might frequently presage subsequent civil liability, but they do not create the civil liabilities themselves. Rather, they are concerned with the professional's integrity and fitness to practise and sustain a livelihood, which usually requires careful scrutiny of their behaviour in light not only of the facts and likely opinions of others about their actions (usually from a distance, with the corruptive sanctimony of hindsight), but also of their own understanding as well as knowledge.

First published in Legal Week

Footnotes

1 Twinsectra v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 (HL)

2 Barlow Clowes International Ltd (in liquidation) & Others v Eurotrust International Ltd [2006] 1 ALL ER 333 (PC)

3 Sir Anthony Clarke MR "Claims against Professionals: Negligence, Dishonesty and Fraud";[2006] 22 Professional Negligence 70/85

4 Professional Negligence and Liability Conference 27 April 2006

5 Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378

6 AG of Zambia v Meer Care & Desai (No2) [2007] ADR.L.R.06/29

7 Markel International Insurance Company Ltd v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd & Ors[2008] EWHC 1135

8 1) Hugh Bryant (2) Reginald Bench v Law Society (DC[2007] EWHC 3043 (Admin)

9 D v Law Society [2003] EWHC 408 (Admin); Bultitude v Law Society [2004] EWCA Civ 1853 (16 December 2004); Donkin v The Law Society [2007] EWHC 414 (Admin) (07 March 2007)

10 R v Ghosh [1982] qb 1053

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.