UK: Corporate Manslaughter And Corporate Homicide Act 2007

Last Updated: 1 September 2008


The introduction of the offence of corporate manslaughter (corporate homicide in Scotland)1 in April 2008 was inevitably going to trigger debate – as to whether the offence will provide the panacea for all ills when it comes to corporations being held accountable for deaths that occur in connection with the organisation, whether the Act is a sop to those who have campaigned for its introduction for the past ten years – or that perhaps that the reality is somewhere in between.

Few people will be ignorant of the Act's tortuous passage through Parliament, and the extensive and protracted debates on its provisions. Reform of the law in this area had been on the drawing board for over a decade – prompted by a high degree of public concern about the perceived inability of the law to deliver justice against large corporations where death occurred. This concern was further fuelled and heightened in the wake of a number of high-profile rail accidents where prosecutions for gross negligence manslaughter had failed or could not be brought.

Expectations that the Act will address and rectify the failings of the old law are inevitably high. But the ten years of debate has resulted in an Act that is layered with complexities – exemptions and partial exemptions (producing anomalies) and involving difficult areas of interpretation. Is this an inevitable consequence perhaps of the difficult balancing act struck between the various competing interests and the need to establish an offence fit for purpose – i.e. an offence that ensures that only the worst incidents of corporate failings result in a criminal charge? So six months on where are we?

The offence

The offence is committed where an individual's death is caused2 because the way the activities of the organised have been managed or organised by the senior management amount to a gross3 breach of a relevant duty of care4 to the deceased.

The Act is intended to apply to the worst instances of corporate failings – so the operation of the Act is restricted to only a sufficiently senior level of management (a collective term) so that it could properly be considered a "corporate" failure. This serves to ensure that the problems of identification and aggregation under the old law are overcome – no individual needs to be prosecuted (and in fact under this Act cannot be5) and the failures of several can now be aggregated and taken as a whole.

Although the offence is one of "corporate" manslaughter, the offence is not limited to incorporated bodies but includes unincorporated bodies too. So that in addition to incorporated bodies (companies, NHS Trusts and local authorities) police forces, government departments, partnerships and trade unions (these latter two, only if they are employers) are organisations which may be prosecuted under the Act6.

Section 1(4) defines senior management as those who play a "significant" role in making decisions about how the whole or a substantial part of the company's activities are to be managed or organised or who play a significant role in the actual management or organising of those activities. Who would be captured by this definition would depend entirely on the organisation itself, for example, in a large corporation with a multitude of divisions a regional manager might well qualify. However, this would depend on the overall size of the company, the number of divisions, the nature and number of the various tiers of management, the diversity of the organisation's activities and even the individual's own job description/specification.

What is interesting is that even though an individual cannot be prosecuted under the Act – the spotlight may still be on them as he/she might have to be identified within the case and his/her role in the organisation scrutinised in order for the prosecution to be able to show that, firstly, they qualify as senior management and, secondly, that their failings led to the death.

The issue of the relevant duty of care is dealt with under Section 2 of the Act. The Act does not create any new duties of care. It is important to note that even though a duty of care may be owed to a person in a myriad of ways – the duty of care under the Act i.e. the relevant duty of care, is deliberately and carefully articulated.

A duty is owed to employees7 and those working for or performing services for the organisation (this captures the situation where a self-employed person is killed whilst working on behalf of an organisation). A duty is also owed by occupiers of premises8 - on the basis that an occupier has to have regard for the health and safety of those in, passing through or even passing outside their premises (e.g. the gargoyle falling from the older building onto an unsuspecting passer-by). A further duty is also owed by those who might be affected by the organisation's activities generally9 - the supply of services, construction and maintenance, other commercial activity and machinery and vehicles.10


A public authority is excluded from owing a duty of care, for the purposes of the Act, in relation to decisions on matters of public policy, particularly in respect of the allocation of resources11. This is likely to give rise to some outcomes the public might regard as surprising. For example, how would a decision to provide a particular treatment – benefiting some, at the expense of others (who then die) compare to the decision not to allocate money for cleaning wards – resulting in the advance of the superbug, clostridium difficile?

The first would be classed as a decision on a matter of public policy and therefore would not attract a relevant duty of care, the second would be classed as the management of a budget and not fall within the exemption. In the latter example, the relevant duty of care would have already have been owed to patients (occupiers of premises and possibly the supply of services) i.e. the duty of care does not arise from the decision itself.

The Ministry of Defence is exempted for owing a duty of care to the armed forces when they come under attack or face resistance in relation to military operations/peacekeeping mission – and in relation to training for such operations12.

The duty of care ordinarily owed by the police and law enforcement agencies as employers or occupiers of premises is suspended when they are dealing with terrorism or when they, in any event, come under attack13. This would mean that a badly organised police response to, for example, violence at a football match which resulted in an officer's death would not attract liability under the Act. Nor do they owe a duty of care to members of the public when carrying out policing activities. Thus even if a member of the public is killed because of a grossly negligent act of a police force, no liability attaches under this Act.

A further exemption relates to the way in which the fire and ambulance services and the NHS respond to emergencies14, which causes other dichotomies in the application of the Act.

Even in relation to an emergency, a relevant duty of care is still owed to an employee – so if a member of the public and an employee died in the same set of circumstances a relevant duty would be owed to one and potentially not the other by virtue of the Act. A relevant duty of care to a patient would not be held to exist if the ambulance broke down on the way to an accident – having not been properly maintained – and somebody died at the scene. Likewise, if the ambulance did turn up (in time) and a decision was made to treat those with minor injuries as opposed to the individual with the severed artery – no relevant duty of care flows from that decision, as the order in which patients are treated is exempt under the Act. However, the exemption does not extend to the way in which medical treatment is carried out – and therefore the provision of unsuitable or ill-trained paramedics could potentially give rise to a relevant duty of care in connection with the supply of services15.

Gross breach

As indicated above, the Act was intended to deal only with the "worst instances of failure across an organisation to manage health and safety properly16". In order to pitch the offence at what they perceived to be the correct level, Parliament appears to have borrowed the wording from traffic law17for what would amount to a gross breach and imported the notion of a breach of duty which "falls far below what can reasonably be expected of the organisation in the circumstances."18

What the concept of "far below" might mean in the context of the Act is vague and in practice it remains to be seen how this will be interpreted. The question of whether there has been a gross breach of duty is a matter for the jury to decide. Section 8 of the Act sets out what factors the jury will consider in reaching their decision. The jury must consider whether the evidence shows that the organisation failed to comply with health and safety legislation, how serious that failure was and how much of a risk of death it posed. This implies that the jury will need to look at how much of a risk of death the failure to comply posed as opposed to the breach of duty – but is that correct? Since the Act does not assist with the phrase "how much of a risk of death it posed" – is it safe to assume this will be interpreted as "a serious and obvious risk of death"19?

Who could be relied upon to objectively assess the risk of death? Hindsight of course is a wonderful thing – but would not the fact that there has been a death rather skew any assessment after the event? Theoretically, of course, there might be some evidence relating to concerns expressed before the event and relayed to management. This would need to be carefully scrutinised to assess whether it was in fact made by an individual who could reasonably be expected to offer an objective evaluation of the risk posed (as opposed to the "scaremonger" who sees death around every corner).

The jury may then also consider whether their were ".....attitudes, policies, systems or accepted practices...... likely to have encouraged" the health and safety breach "....or produced tolerance of it"20. This has been paraphrased as "a management culture" which is accepting of failures relating to health and safety. What the section does not make clear is whether the prosecution have to prove that "senior management" were aware of this apparent culture or whether proving that they ought to have known would be sufficient.

The jury may then be permitted to consider "any other matters they consider relevant"21


The courts powers of sentencing, upon conviction, are the imposition of an unlimited fine, the imposition of a remedial order22 and the power to make a publicity order23– requiring the organisation to publicise the conviction.

The level of the fine has been the subject of consultation by the Sentencing Advisory Panel. The Panel has recommended fines within the range of 2.5%-10% of the organisation's turnover. The recommendation is that the provisional starting point should be at 5%, aggravated or mitigated as appropriate in the circumstances. The financial consequences for an organisation could therefore be staggering. In addition, compensation is always an issue for the criminal courts to consider, however, the Court may take the view that families of victims will be able to seek compensation in the civil courts, which are arguably better placed to properly assess the detail of a claim for damages.

However, the reputational consequences for an organisation are perhaps as, if not more, crushing than the immediate financial implications.


Whether the expectations about the Act can be met will obviously depend upon the way in which the Act is interpreted, applied, prosecuted and, if appropriate, sentenced.

To-date there has not been a prosecution. This does not mean that organisations are perfect when it comes to health and safety, that the police are unwilling to investigate or that the Crown Prosecution Service is not ready to prosecute an appropriate case. It is a reflection of the fact that it is early days.

What the outcome is when a case is brought remains to be seen – but it is perhaps important to reflect that as no individual can be convicted of corporate manslaughter, it is reasonable to assume that this omission is likely to still leave the bereaved with a certain degree of dissatisfaction which no level of fine or reputational dent will dissipate.


1 Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (the Act)

2 The test for homicide will apply i.e. whether the act or omission was a more than minimal contribution to the death.

3 Section 1(4)(b) applying the test of "falls far below what can reasonably be expected"

4 The words "relevant duty of care" have a role in limiting the scope of the new offence.

5 Individuals may still be prosecuted for an offence manslaughter by gross negligence.

6 Section 1(2) and Schedule 1

7 Section 2(1)(a)

8 Section 2(1)(b)

9 Section 2(1)(c)

10 The provision relating to the duty of care owed to detained persons (section 2(1)(d) has not yet been brought into force – however, a relevant duty of care would still be owed to a detained person by virtue of the occupier of premises provision

11 Section 3 (1)

12 Section 4

13 Section 5

14 Section 6

15 Section 2(1)(b) & (c)(i)

16 Understanding the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, Ministry of Justice Guidance (October 2007)

17 Under the Road Traffic Act 1991, Section 2, dangerous driving is driving which falls "far below what word be expected of a competent and careful driver..."

18 Section 1(4)(b)

19 R v Singh (Gurpal) 1999 CLR 582 approved in R v Misra Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2375

20 Section 8(3)

21 Section 8(4)

22 Section 9

23 Section 10

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.