UK: Trusts & Trustees Article: The Criminal Offences Of Failure To Prevent Tax Evasion

Last Updated: 6 December 2017
Article by Tim Corfield and Julia Schaefer

On 30 September 2017, the UK Criminal Finances Act 2017 (the CFA) came into force, along with its newly-focused corporate criminal offences of failure to prevent facilitation of tax evasion. Given the extraterritorial ramifications of the CFA, businesses in the UK and those with a UK nexus, especially those in the financial services and accountancy sectors, including branch offices, fiduciaries and trustees, promotors and managers of investment products, and wealth managers, will need to be astute to its challenges and effects, and take what H.M. Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has called a, 'risk-based and proportionate' approach to implementation of preventative procedures.

Introduction

Sir Winston Churchill, with inimitable wit, contended that, 'for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle'.

For decades successive UK Chancellors of the Exchequer, and their often beleaguered governments, have bemoaned the curse of lost revenue and talked tough on tax evasion: from Dennis Healy's pledge that, 'The difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness of a prison wall', to (latterly) Alistair Darling's and George Osborne's open commitment to target tax evasion and dubiously and self-servingly labelled, 'off-shore tax havens'.

Those commitments often floundered when it came to quantifiable results, especially last year when the UK Office for Budget Responsibility decried the lack of resources which had resulted in a failure by HMRC to reach its £1.05 billion target for recoupment (it in fact fell short by circa £780 million).

The latest addition to HMRC's tax evasion armoury is the CFA, and its newly-focussed criminal offences of:

  1. failure to prevent the facilitation of UK tax evasion offences (section 45, CFA); and
  2. failure to prevent facilitation of foreign tax evasion offences under certain circumstances (section 46, CFA).

In this article, we will review the newly introduced measures, showing that they do not introduce any new offences, but widen the liability for existing offences. We will then review the mechanics of the application of section 45 and 46 CFA, followed by a closer look at the only defence, being that a business has in place robust procedures designed to prevent associated persons from committing the facilitation of tax evasion.

The offences

In brief, section 45 CFA imposes liability on a business for tax evasion facilitation offences committed by an 'associated person'. Similarly, section 46 CFA imposes liability on a business for foreign tax evasion facilitation offences committed by an 'associated person'.

The offences do not therefore introduce any new liability; neither do they change the definitions of existing offences with regard to tax evasion fraud. Instead, they alter the application of existing offences, and for the first time seek to impose liability on incorporated bodies and partnerships for offences committed by their employees and agents. Advice relating to tax avoidance will remain legal. Also, legitimate advice and services provided in good faith, which clients misuse to commit tax evasion offences will not be caught.

As stated, sections 45 and 46 CFA will apply to incorporated bodies (typically companies) and partnerships (section 44(2) CFA), definitions of which will be interpreted in the widest sense. Throughout this article we will use the term 'businesses' to describe any entity potentially covered by these new measures.

The only defence provided under sections 45 and 46 CFA is for businesses to have in place procedures which prevent the facilitation of tax offences, or to show that such procedures would have been unreasonable. As such, practitioners may be familiar with some existing requirements, for example imposed by anti-money laundering (AML) legislation and the Bribery Act 2010. There are a number of differences, however, and relying on existing policies and procedures alone will not be sufficient to comply with the CFA requirements.

Operation of the offences

Associated persons

Sections 45 and 46 CFA extend liability of 'associated persons'. According to HMRC, the class of 'associated persons' is drafted deliberately widely, and designed to be fact-dependent. Its guidance clarifies that the associated person 'must commit the tax evasion facilitation offence in the capacity of an associated person'. Any facilitation committed in a personal capacity will not be deemed relevant.

The determination of a relevant association is conducted by analysing the way in which services are carried out. For example, advice obtained from external Counsel or an overseas law firm, which is charged for by way of disbursement to the client, would fall to be within the definition of 'on behalf of' a business. Importantly, this could for example also include a payroll services provider who, in that capacity, facilitates tax evasion by employees. HMRC has stated that for the purposes of sections 45 and 46 CFA the important factor is that the business continues to control the ongoing relationship between the client and the external adviser. In this respect, the principle is virtually identical to that of section 8 of the Bribery Act 2010.

In the final analysis, therefore, businesses will become vicariously liable for the criminal acts of employees, agents and associated persons, even if no senior management of the business (or indeed anybody within the business itself) was involved in or aware of the impugned conduct.

Strict liability offence

For either a section 45 or section 46 CFA offence to occur, three separate stages are required:

  • first, there has to be a criminal tax evasion by a taxpayer under existing laws;
  • second, the criminal facilitation of the tax evasion must be by an 'associated person' of the business, who is acting in that capacity; and
  • third, the business must have failed to prevent its associated person from committing the criminal facilitation act.

Therefore, sections 45 and 46 CFA introduce no new offences: the actions they seek to punish are already offences under the criminal law. Existing statutory offences include the fraudulent evasion of specific taxes, such as VAT (section 72 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994), or income tax (section 106 A of the Taxes Management Act 1970), or the common law offence of cheating the public revenue, for example through failing to disclose income or failing to register, or account for, VAT.

Importantly, however, the sections do introduce a strict liability for businesses. If stages one and two have occurred, businesses will be guilty of the offence unless they can show that they had reasonable procedures in place to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion.

This also means that it is not necessary for any tax to have been successfully evaded, nor for there to be a conviction at taxpayer-level for the liability to be engaged. Hence, by way of example, where a taxpayer has self-reported a tax evasion, the business can still be prosecuted, subject to proving to the criminal standard that the evader's conduct was dishonest, and an offence under sections 45 or 46 CFA was committed.

Conversely, negligent or ignorant facilitation of a tax evasion offence will not be covered. Strict liability tax offences, such as failing to deliver a tax return, will therefore not be relevant to sections 45 and 46 CFA.

Dual criminality under section 46 CFA

With regard to facilitation of foreign tax evasion under section 46 CFA, there is a further requirement of dual criminality. Where the tax evasion and facilitation would not be illegal in the UK if committed there, section 46 CFA will not be engaged. The section does not, therefore, impose a requirement on practitioners to familiarize themselves with foreign tax law.

It is however vital, to understand how tenuous the UK nexus pursuant to section 46 CFA may be. According to examples given by HMRC, the net is drawn so widely as to include a trustee of an offshore trust attending a meeting in the UK, where the foreign tax evasion is facilitated.

Explanatory notes published alongside the Criminal Finances Bill's (as it then was) passage through Parliament clarify that where a person associated with an overseas relevant body (and acting as such) commits a tax evasion facilitation offence in relation to UK tax, the new section 46 CFA offence will be committed and can be tried by UK courts. The situation is just the same as where an individual abroad engages in criminal conduct that has its result in the UK or attempts such an offence from abroad.

Given the potentially wide-ranging scope of the new measure, it is reassuring that the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Director of the Serious Fraud Office will be required before proceedings under section 46 CFA can be commenced in England and Wales. This oversight should provide a safeguard in cases where the U.K. nexus is wholly incidental, or which would result in prosecutions contrary to UK public policy.

Penalties and sanctions

The sanctions for commission of the offences of failure to prevent the facilitation of UK tax evasion or failure to prevent facilitation of foreign tax evasion include unlimited financial penalties, as well as ancillary orders under the CFA such as confiscation orders.

Equally damaging will be the regulatory sanctions and reputational damage that may follow, with the potential for loss of licences and withdrawal of regulatory consents. As such, the new provisions pose the potential for grave reputational risk to businesses, and should be regarded with utmost seriousness.

One defence: reasonable preventative measures

The ... tax code was written by 'A' (grade) students. Every April 15, we have to pay somebody who got an 'A' in accounting to keep ourselves from being sent to jail—P.J. O'Rourke.

The only defence available to a business is to show that it had either put in place, 'reasonable prevention procedures', designed to stop its associated persons from committing tax evasion facilitation offences, or to show that it was unreasonable to expect it to have such procedures (sections 45(2) and 46(3) and (4) CFA). All businesses will therefore be required to conduct a robust, thorough risk assessment specifically in relation to sections 45 and 46 CFA.

Draft guidelines published by HMRC in October last year1 urged that businesses put in place tailored 'robust procedures', and that it would not be enough merely to rely on existing bribery and anti-money laundering guidelines. HMRC nevertheless acknowledged that businesses will need time to put in place new procedures and guidelines, and has already said that there will be a phased introduction of prosecutions of the new offences. It does, however, expect businesses to implement 'rapidly' new measures designed to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion, and businesses will have to be able to demonstrate vigilance.

As such, HMRC does expect businesses to be able to demonstrate evidence of the following from 30 September 2017:

  1. a clear commitment to compliance;
  2. top-level commitment;
  3. an initial communication plan; and
  4. an implementation plan.

Clearly, a starting point in assessing the proportionality and reasonableness of businesses' anti-facilitation measures will be to:

  • consider opportunity—ie assess whether associated persons have the opportunity and capacity to facilitate client tax evasion;
  • consider motive—ie as an organization, is the culture one in which associated persons are dissuaded from committing (alternatively incentivised to commit) a tax evasion facilitation offence; and
  • consider means—ie does the organization promote, offer or hold products and services that are capable of being abused, and what training and monitoring is given to those at risk (theoretically) of abusing those products and services.

The current guidance suggests that preventative measures should be informed by six key guiding principles:

  1. undertaking a risk assessment to assess, identify and prioritise a business's potential exposure;
  2. implementing proportionate risk-based procedures, including formal policies and practical steps, which will be informed by the nature, scale and complexity of the business;
  3. demonstrating top-level commitment from senior management to preventing persons associated with the business from engaging in criminal facilitation of tax evasion, which includes fostering an appropriate culture and communication of this;
  4. conducting appropriate due diligence on staff, persons who perform services on behalf of the business and clients;
  5. undertaking internal and external communication and training of employees, agents, associated persons and clients, on prevention policies and procedures to ensure that they are culturally embedded within the organization; and
  6. consistent monitoring and review of its prevention procedures and processes.

As stated previously, the draft guidance is similar in many respects to that existing in relation to AML regulations and the Bribery Act 2010. A business may therefore conclude that measures and procedures are already in place designed to prevent fraud by its own staff. It is vital to appreciate, however, that those procedures may not be sufficient if they do not extend, using a risk-based approach, to preventing facilitation by associated persons.

Guidelines and procedures recommended for trustees

The potential exposures for trustees under the new measures are manifold. At the time of writing, specific guidance has yet to be published by regulatory bodies such as the UK Charities Commission or the Pensions Regulator. Guidance published by the Law Society in September 2017, and last year's draft HMRC guidance do, however, assist in highlighting (non-comprehensive) areas specifically relevant to trustees which should be carefully considered by trustees when preparing 'robust' facilitation-prevention procedures.

As a first step, trustees should undertake a proportionate risk assessment, ensuring that it is carefully documented and recorded in writing. The assessment should review all of the products and services provided, together with internal systems and client data which may be utilized to facilitate tax evasion. For that purpose, risk assessment which a trustee had undertaken in relation to AML regulations or the Bribery Act 2010 will be a useful starting point, with the above-mentioned caveat that HMRC does not regard these as sufficient of themselves to assess risk for offences under the CFA.

Trustees need to remember that the CFA requires no knowledge of tax law. The material fact is an understanding of how the trustee–client relationship, and any specific services offered by the trustee provide opportunities for the facilitation of tax evasion. It is vital therefore that the trustee demonstrates its understanding of these risk areas.

There should be clearly expressed commitment from senior management, internally and externally, to the procedures put in place to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion. Senior management should also be involved in developing and implementing the risk assessment. Risk assessments should be revised and reviewed periodically, in particular where new employees are taken on which lead to the introduction of new client relationships.

Trustee-internal risks may stem from issues such as the internal risk culture, training gaps, and lack of clarity of procedures and guidelines for employees. Trustees should therefore ensure that adequate and tailored training is given to all staff, with a clear understanding by them where risks lie and that the management is committed to the prevention of facilitation of tax evasion. 'Four-eye' policies, and regular reviews of client files by senior staff will be a further way to demonstrate that effective procedures are in place.

Trustees should undertake a review of their client demographics. It will not be unusual for many to be involved with complex trust structures, for example, or those which have a connection with politically exposed persons or beneficiaries affiliated with countries with high levels of corruption.

Transaction-specific risks may reveal potential 'red flags', which in the trustee context could be involvement of third-party introducers, clients' requirements for complex or unusual invoicing procedures, or an unwillingness to provide information about the settlor of a trust.

Finally, trustees should conduct a careful review of all outsourcing agreements and standard contracts with third-party service providers, such as external auditors, accountants, and lawyers. These agreements should in future reflect the trustee's commitment to the prevention of facilitation of tax evasion by associated persons.

Conclusion—a 'tax' on businesses?

Sections 45 and 46 CFA introduce no new offences, but increase the scope of liability for existing offences and shift responsibility for associated persons on to businesses. HMRC's rationale for introducing the CFA is that it has struggled for too long to hold businesses to account under existing UK criminal law, due to the rules of criminal attribution of knowledge to the board of directors or senior management. It hopes that the new measures introduced by the CFA will provide it with the additional 'grip and teeth' necessary to prosecute tax evasion offences committed in the context of businesses operating internationally.

In the short term, businesses of all sizes are required to implement new layers of checks and procedures, and some may regard the new measures as a further stealth 'tax' on businesses.

Already, the offshore industry in particular spends record sums on compliance with existing measures designed to assist HMRC and other government agencies in their enforcement tasks against financial crimes. For example, a 2013 'WealthInsight' report (Appendix) predicted that global spending on AML compliance would grow to more than $8 billion by 2017. KPMG's 2014 anti-money laundering survey found that 78 per cent of respondents reported increases in their total investment in AML activity, with 74 per cent also predicting further increases in AML investment before 2017. The new measures pursuant to the CFA are likely to add to this significant growth in additional expenditure which businesses face to escape potential liability for financial criminal offences committed by others.

Furthermore, while the new offences are aimed only at organizations (and not at their individual principals, directors, and management), individuals may yet have every reason to feel exposed. If HMRC is able to successfully prosecute an entity for failure to establish robust procedures as required by the CFA, and significant fines are levied, then we venture that directors and managers may be susceptible to a civil suit at the hands of the entity and its stakeholders who may allege breach of duty, misconduct, or mismanagement. According to Financial Times data, the number of times HMRC asked foreign governments to assist with tax investigations rose from 591 to 1096 between 2011 and 2016, so these threats are on the rise.

Time will tell whether HMRC's new weapon in its armoury against tax evasion will be effective in tackling the behaviour it was designed to combat. Certainly, the strict liability and extraterritorial approach attempts to circumvent the difficulties HMRC had previously experienced in seeking to collect revenue and impose liability on organizations.

Meanwhile, it is vital that businesses protect themselves and put in place bespoke measures and procedures that will prevent the facilitation of tax evasion offences by its associated persons.

Appendix—Sections 45 and 46 Criminal Finances Act 2017

45 Failure to prevent facilitation of UK tax evasion offences

  1. A relevant body (B) is guilty of an offence if a person commits a UK tax evasion facilitation offence when acting in the capacity of a person associated with B.
  2. It is a defence for B to prove that, when the UK tax evasion facilitation offence was committed—

    1. B had in place such prevention procedures as it was reasonable in all the circumstances to expect B to have in place, or
    2. it was not reasonable in all the circumstances to expect B to have any prevention procedures in place.
  3. In subsection (2) 'prevention procedures' means procedures designed to prevent persons acting in the capacity of a person associated with B from committing UK tax evasion facilitation offences.
  4. In this Part 'UK tax evasion offence' means—

    1. an offence of cheating the public revenue, or
    2. an offence under the law of any part of the United Kingdom consisting of being knowingly concerned in, or in taking steps with a view to, the fraudulent evasion of a tax.
  5. In this Part 'UK tax evasion facilitation offence' means an offence under the law of any part of the United Kingdom consisting of—

    1. being knowingly concerned in, or in taking steps with a view to, the fraudulent evasion of a tax by another person,
    2. aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of a UK tax evasion offence, or
    3. being involved art and part in the commission of an offence consisting of being knowingly concerned in, or in taking steps with a view to, the fraudulent evasion of a tax.
  6. Conduct carried out with a view to the fraudulent evasion of tax by another person is not to be regarded as a UK tax evasion facilitation offence by virtue of subsection (5)(a) unless the other person has committed a UK tax evasion offence facilitated by that conduct.
  7. For the purposes of this section 'tax' means a tax imposed under the law of any part of the United Kingdom, including national insurance contributions under—

    1. Part 1 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992, or
    2. Part 1 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992.
  8. A relevant body guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

    1. on conviction on indictment, to a fine;
    2. on summary conviction in England and Wales, to a fine;
    3. on summary conviction in Scotland or Northern Ireland, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum.

46 Failure to prevent facilitation of foreign tax evasion offences

  1. A relevant body (B) is guilty of an offence if at any time—

    1. a person commits a foreign tax evasion facilitation offence when acting in the capacity of a person associated with B, and
    2. any of the conditions in subsection (2) is satisfied.
  2. The conditions are—

    1. that B is a body incorporated, or a partnership formed, under the law of any part of the United Kingdom;
    2. that B carries on business or part of a business in the United Kingdom;
    3. that any conduct constituting part of the foreign tax evasion facilitation offence takes place in the United Kingdom; and in paragraph (b) 'business' includes an undertaking.
  3. It is a defence for B to prove that, when the foreign tax evasion facilitation offence was committed—

    1. B had in place such prevention procedures as it was reasonable in all the circumstances to expect B to have in place, or
    2. it was not reasonable in all the circumstances to expect B to have any prevention procedures in place.
  4. In subsection (3) 'prevention procedures' means procedures designed to prevent persons acting in the capacity of a person associated with B from committing foreign tax evasion facilitation offences under the law of the foreign country concerned.
  5. In this Part 'foreign tax evasion offence' means conduct which—

    1. amounts to an offence under the law of a foreign country,
    2. relates to a breach of a duty relating to a tax imposed under the law of that country, and
    3. would be regarded by the courts of any part of the United Kingdom as amounting to being knowingly concerned in, or in taking steps with a view to, the fraudulent evasion of that tax.
  6. In this Part 'foreign tax evasion facilitation offence' means conduct which—

    1. amounts to an offence under the law of a foreign country,
    2. relates to the commission by another person of a foreign tax evasion offence under that law, and
    3. would, if the foreign tax evasion offence were a UK tax evasion offence, amount to a UK tax evasion facilitation offence (see section 45(5) and (6)).
  7. A relevant body guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

    1. on conviction on indictment, to a fine;
    2. on summary conviction in England and Wales, to a fine;

on summary conviction in Scotland or Northern Ireland, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum.

Footnotes

1. HMRC is required to publish final guidance on or before 30 September 2017 but this is unfortunately not yet available at the time of writing.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
24 Jan 2018, Conference, St Peter Port, Guernsey

In association with the Guernsey Training Agency, we are pleased to offer a unique, interactive event that will explore the role of integrity in the modern employment relationship, with a particular focus on the financial services sector.

20 Feb 2018, Conference, St Helier, Jersey

Carey Olsen partner Marcus Pallot is speaking at the 2nd Annual International Taxation Conference held on 20 February and organised by the Jersey International Business School.

28 Feb 2018, Speaking Engagement, St Helier, Jersey

Carey Olsen partners Tim Corfield and Marcus Pallot are speaking at the Jersey International Business School's Accountancy CPD 2018 Seminar on 28 February.

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

    Disclaimer

    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

    Registration

    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

    Cookies

    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

    Links

    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

    Mail-A-Friend

    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

    Emails

    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

    Security

    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions