UK: A Second Bite Of The Cherry?

Last Updated: 21 August 2008
Article by Andrew Blair and Zoe Millington-Jones

In Taylor Walton v Laing (2007), covered in the Footnotes section of the last Lawyers' Liability briefing, the Court of Appeal struck out a solicitors' negligence claim on the grounds of abuse of process. The Court reached its conclusion on the basis that the negligence proceedings would be re-litigating the same issue considered by the court in the underlying dispute, and that all the arguments made by the claimant (including allegations of negligence against the solicitor) could have been made during the trial of that dispute or on appeal.

In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeal clarified that simply bringing proceedings against a solicitor for negligence which allege matters that are different from those decided in the underlying dispute is not enough to bring the administration of justice into disrepute. For example, allegations of negligence during the course of litigation against solicitors will normally involve an attempt by a claimant to demonstrate that the previous conclusion of the court would have been different, absent negligence.

Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group (2008) is another recent decision on abuse of process in the professional liability context, this time involving a complex, multi-party construction dispute. Here, the Court of Appeal refused to strike out an action against engineering and environmental consultants, rejecting the consultants' argument that the claim amounted to an abuse of process because the claimant could and should have claimed against the consultants in an earlier action against a contractor arising out of the same facts.

The claimant had brought proceedings against the contractor in 2001, to which the contractor joined the consultants as Part 20 defendants ("the original construction action"). The claimant did not bring a direct claim against the consultants in the original construction action. Indeed, the claimant's quantum claim was treated separately from the Part 20 claim and a number of claims made by other parties against the contractor and consultants which were all being heard together.

The claimant obtained judgment against the contractor for the whole of its claim, part of which was satisfied by an interim payment. Due to the insolvency of the contractor, the claimant then pursued its excess layer insurers for the remainder (the insurers having in the meantime pulled cover) and settled the action on the basis of refund of premium.

Out of pocket, the claimant then brought the proceedings against the consultants. The consultants argued that the claim should be struck out as an abuse of process on a number of grounds, including that:

  • the allegations in the current proceedings were essentially the same as those made by the contractor against the consultants in the original construction action;

  • there was nothing to prevent the claimant from pursuing the contractors in the original construction action; and

  • the claimant should have realised that the action against the excess layer insurers was bound to fail and should have rejoined the original construction action.

The Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision and refused to strike out the claim. There was no distinction which could be drawn as a matter of law between cases where the original proceedings concluded by settlement and where they concluded by judgment. The Court said that the proper approach when considering whether to strike out for abuse of process was not one of discretion, but a balancing exercise involving the assessment of a large number of factors. The Court of Appeal took the view that the claimant was entitled to take the decision to pursue the excess layer insurers rather than to rejoin the original construction action. This was on the basis that bringing all possible actions at the same time can be a recipe for complex and unwieldy litigation. The Court of Appeal considered the interests of the consultants, including the potential costs of the subsequent action. However, it found that the claimant had notified the consultants of the claimant's potential claim but the consultants then had failed to put the claimant on notice that the prospect of a second action would cause them oppression or vexation. The Court of Appeal said that it was inappropriate for the consultants to make no response earlier but to assert it was an abuse when the claimant's intentions turned into actions.

In Stuart v Goldberg & Ors (2008), the disputes arose out of dealings between the claimant, a third party, and the third party's solicitor in relation to a possible commercial enterprise in Mongolia. The claimant successfully previously sued the solicitor in 2000 to enforce an undertaking given by the solicitor in relation to the enterprise ("2000 action"). Shortly before the trial of the 2000 action, the claimant became aware that he had a claim for inducement of breach of contract against the solicitor. During the trial, the claimant also became aware that representations made by the solicitor to him in relation to the commercial enterprise were false. In the second action, the claimant brought the inducement and misrepresentation claims against the solicitor.

The Court of Appeal allowed the claimant's appeal against an order preventing him from suing on the basis that the second action was not an abuse of process, despite the fact that the claimant was aware before the trial of the 2000 action of some of the facts relevant to the second action. Although the Court of Appeal considered that the claimant should have put the solicitor on notice about the potential further claims, the failure to do so did not amount to abuse of process in this case. Lloyd LJ took into account that the action for breach of undertaking was relatively straightforward and that the addition of the further claims to the 2000 action would have delayed the trial. The Court accepted that different facts may have led to a different conclusion, in particular if the claimant had received the information about the further claims much earlier.

The Court of Appeal in Aldi Stores and Stuart stressed that parties involved in complex litigation must give careful consideration as to whether other actions might arise out of the same facts. The proper approach, when a party wished to pursue other proceedings whilst reserving a right in the existing proceedings, was to write a warning letter to the other side and refer to the court for directions. This was not only in the interest of the parties, but also in the public interest, especially with regard to the efficient use of court resources.

These decisions signal that lawyers and other professionals will often find it hard to succeed in arguing that a claim against them should be struck out for abuse of process on the ground that it should have been raised in earlier proceedings. The cases are very fact sensitive and success or otherwise on a strike out application will clearly depend on what has gone before - with these decisions providing a helpful guide to the factors the courts will take into account. It does appear, however, that defendants will have more chance of success where the claimant has not put all his cards on the table in the original proceedings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions